{"title":"利用核磁共振成像和超声波成像技术全面评估超重/肥胖患者肝脏以外的不同腹部脂肪区。","authors":"Yixin Chen, Ting Zhang, Baoding Qin, Rui Zhang, Minting Liu, Ruomi Guo, Yanhua Zhu, Jie Zeng, Yanming Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04591-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ectopic fat deposition, involving lipid infiltration within organs and fat accumulating surrounding organs, plays a crucial role in the development of metabolic abnormalities in obesity. Current imaging measurements of obesity primarily focus on lipid infiltration within liver, neglecting fat deposition in other areas. This study aims to explore the methods of measuring and correlating different types of abdominal ectopic fat deposition in obese patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound techniques, and to investigate the relationship between these fat parameters and obesity-related metabolic markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Abdominal ectopic fat deposition including liver fat content, mesenteric fat thickness (MFT), perirenal fat thickness (PrFT) and preperitoneal fat thickness (PFT) were measured in 220 overweight/obese patients using both MRI and ultrasound techniques. Correlation analysis validated the concordance of fat parameters at specific sites between the two imaging methods and identified the cutoff values of hepatic attenuation coefficient (AC) for diagnosis of liver steatosis. Additionally, we investigated the correlation between fat parameters by both methods and obesity-related metabolic markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultrasonic measurement of PrFT and hepatic AC both had high correlation with PrFT (r = 0.829, p < 0.001) and hepatic Proton-density fat fraction (PDFF, r = 0.822, p < 0.001) measured via MR. Hepatic AC cutoff values for diagnosing mild, moderate, and severe fatty liver were 0.705 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.922), 0.755 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.923), and 0.875 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.890) respectively. Hepatic AC correlated significantly with AST and ALT (r = 0.477 ~ 0.533, p < 0.001). MFT measured by ultrasound were positively associated with glycated hemoglobin (r = 0.324 ~ 0.371, p < 0.001) and serum triglyceride levels (r = 0.303 ~ 0.353, p < 0.001). PrFT measured by both methods showed significant positive correlations with serum creatinine levels (r = 0.305 ~ 0.308, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both MRI and ultrasound demonstrate metabolic correlations in quantifying mesenteric, hepatic, and perirenal fat. In addition to assessment of liver fat content, the measurements of ectopic fat deposition by MRI or ultrasound are a simple and crucial way for comprehensive fat evaluation in individuals with overweight/obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive assessment of distinct abdominal fat compartments beyond liver content in overweight/obese patients using MRI and ultrasound imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Yixin Chen, Ting Zhang, Baoding Qin, Rui Zhang, Minting Liu, Ruomi Guo, Yanhua Zhu, Jie Zeng, Yanming Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-024-04591-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ectopic fat deposition, involving lipid infiltration within organs and fat accumulating surrounding organs, plays a crucial role in the development of metabolic abnormalities in obesity. Current imaging measurements of obesity primarily focus on lipid infiltration within liver, neglecting fat deposition in other areas. This study aims to explore the methods of measuring and correlating different types of abdominal ectopic fat deposition in obese patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound techniques, and to investigate the relationship between these fat parameters and obesity-related metabolic markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Abdominal ectopic fat deposition including liver fat content, mesenteric fat thickness (MFT), perirenal fat thickness (PrFT) and preperitoneal fat thickness (PFT) were measured in 220 overweight/obese patients using both MRI and ultrasound techniques. Correlation analysis validated the concordance of fat parameters at specific sites between the two imaging methods and identified the cutoff values of hepatic attenuation coefficient (AC) for diagnosis of liver steatosis. Additionally, we investigated the correlation between fat parameters by both methods and obesity-related metabolic markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultrasonic measurement of PrFT and hepatic AC both had high correlation with PrFT (r = 0.829, p < 0.001) and hepatic Proton-density fat fraction (PDFF, r = 0.822, p < 0.001) measured via MR. Hepatic AC cutoff values for diagnosing mild, moderate, and severe fatty liver were 0.705 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.922), 0.755 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.923), and 0.875 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.890) respectively. Hepatic AC correlated significantly with AST and ALT (r = 0.477 ~ 0.533, p < 0.001). MFT measured by ultrasound were positively associated with glycated hemoglobin (r = 0.324 ~ 0.371, p < 0.001) and serum triglyceride levels (r = 0.303 ~ 0.353, p < 0.001). PrFT measured by both methods showed significant positive correlations with serum creatinine levels (r = 0.305 ~ 0.308, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both MRI and ultrasound demonstrate metabolic correlations in quantifying mesenteric, hepatic, and perirenal fat. In addition to assessment of liver fat content, the measurements of ectopic fat deposition by MRI or ultrasound are a simple and crucial way for comprehensive fat evaluation in individuals with overweight/obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04591-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04591-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comprehensive assessment of distinct abdominal fat compartments beyond liver content in overweight/obese patients using MRI and ultrasound imaging.
Background: Ectopic fat deposition, involving lipid infiltration within organs and fat accumulating surrounding organs, plays a crucial role in the development of metabolic abnormalities in obesity. Current imaging measurements of obesity primarily focus on lipid infiltration within liver, neglecting fat deposition in other areas. This study aims to explore the methods of measuring and correlating different types of abdominal ectopic fat deposition in obese patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound techniques, and to investigate the relationship between these fat parameters and obesity-related metabolic markers.
Methods: Abdominal ectopic fat deposition including liver fat content, mesenteric fat thickness (MFT), perirenal fat thickness (PrFT) and preperitoneal fat thickness (PFT) were measured in 220 overweight/obese patients using both MRI and ultrasound techniques. Correlation analysis validated the concordance of fat parameters at specific sites between the two imaging methods and identified the cutoff values of hepatic attenuation coefficient (AC) for diagnosis of liver steatosis. Additionally, we investigated the correlation between fat parameters by both methods and obesity-related metabolic markers.
Results: Ultrasonic measurement of PrFT and hepatic AC both had high correlation with PrFT (r = 0.829, p < 0.001) and hepatic Proton-density fat fraction (PDFF, r = 0.822, p < 0.001) measured via MR. Hepatic AC cutoff values for diagnosing mild, moderate, and severe fatty liver were 0.705 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.922), 0.755 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.923), and 0.875 dB/cm/MHz (AUC = 0.890) respectively. Hepatic AC correlated significantly with AST and ALT (r = 0.477 ~ 0.533, p < 0.001). MFT measured by ultrasound were positively associated with glycated hemoglobin (r = 0.324 ~ 0.371, p < 0.001) and serum triglyceride levels (r = 0.303 ~ 0.353, p < 0.001). PrFT measured by both methods showed significant positive correlations with serum creatinine levels (r = 0.305 ~ 0.308, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Both MRI and ultrasound demonstrate metabolic correlations in quantifying mesenteric, hepatic, and perirenal fat. In addition to assessment of liver fat content, the measurements of ectopic fat deposition by MRI or ultrasound are a simple and crucial way for comprehensive fat evaluation in individuals with overweight/obesity.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits