对确定赛内使用兴奋剂的最低报告限值进行评估。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Vinod S Nair, Fatjon A Hanelli, Chad Moore, Jenna M Goodrum, Geoffrey D Miller, Andre Crouch, Daniel Eichner
{"title":"对确定赛内使用兴奋剂的最低报告限值进行评估。","authors":"Vinod S Nair, Fatjon A Hanelli, Chad Moore, Jenna M Goodrum, Geoffrey D Miller, Andre Crouch, Daniel Eichner","doi":"10.1002/dta.3799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The applicability of urinary minimum reporting limits (MRLs) to determine in-competition use of prohibited substances is an evolving topic. Most stimulants are subject to a universal MRL, despite the wide range of commercially available dosages for commonly used stimulants. Further, it is unknown whether the urinary MRL is reflective of a pharmacological dose ingested after the start of the in-competition period. To evaluate whether urinary MRLs can distinguish between in-competition and out-of-competition use, a controlled administration study was performed with three commonly used stimulants-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil at relatively low but therapeutically relevant dosages. Four to six volunteers were administered a particular drug once per day for five consecutive days. Urine, serum, dried blood spots (DBS), and oral fluid (OF) were collected during the active administration period and for 48 h after cessation of use. For all participants, urinary concentrations for all target analytes exceeded the MRL even 48 h after cessation of use. In serum and DBS, most volunteers showed detectable amounts at 48 h post use. Peak concentrations were variable between target compounds even with similar administered dosages. Further, there was a reproducible difference between serum and DBS concentrations. Interpretation of results from OF measurements was challenging due to the inability to normalize for hydration status and OF viscosity. Analyte concentrations decreased steadily over the washout period but did not correlate across matrices for all target analytes. The study reiterates the challenges associated with determining in-competition use by relying on urinary concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Minimum Reporting Limits to Determine In-Competition Use of Stimulants.\",\"authors\":\"Vinod S Nair, Fatjon A Hanelli, Chad Moore, Jenna M Goodrum, Geoffrey D Miller, Andre Crouch, Daniel Eichner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dta.3799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The applicability of urinary minimum reporting limits (MRLs) to determine in-competition use of prohibited substances is an evolving topic. Most stimulants are subject to a universal MRL, despite the wide range of commercially available dosages for commonly used stimulants. Further, it is unknown whether the urinary MRL is reflective of a pharmacological dose ingested after the start of the in-competition period. To evaluate whether urinary MRLs can distinguish between in-competition and out-of-competition use, a controlled administration study was performed with three commonly used stimulants-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil at relatively low but therapeutically relevant dosages. Four to six volunteers were administered a particular drug once per day for five consecutive days. Urine, serum, dried blood spots (DBS), and oral fluid (OF) were collected during the active administration period and for 48 h after cessation of use. For all participants, urinary concentrations for all target analytes exceeded the MRL even 48 h after cessation of use. In serum and DBS, most volunteers showed detectable amounts at 48 h post use. Peak concentrations were variable between target compounds even with similar administered dosages. Further, there was a reproducible difference between serum and DBS concentrations. Interpretation of results from OF measurements was challenging due to the inability to normalize for hydration status and OF viscosity. Analyte concentrations decreased steadily over the washout period but did not correlate across matrices for all target analytes. The study reiterates the challenges associated with determining in-competition use by relying on urinary concentrations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3799\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3799","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿液最低报告限值(MRL)在确定赛内使用禁用物质方面的适用性是一个不断演变的话题。尽管常用兴奋剂的市售剂量范围很广,但大多数兴奋剂都有一个通用的 MRL。此外,尿液中的最高残留限量是否反映了在赛内开始后摄入的药理剂量,目前还不得而知。为了评估尿液最大残留限量是否能区分赛内和赛外用药,我们对三种常用兴奋剂--苯丙胺、哌醋甲酯和莫达非尼进行了控制给药研究,给药剂量相对较低,但具有治疗作用。四至六名志愿者连续五天每天服用一次特定药物。在用药期间和停药后 48 小时内收集尿液、血清、干血斑(DBS)和口腔液(OF)。即使在停止使用 48 小时后,所有参与者尿液中所有目标分析物的浓度都超过了最大残留限量。在血清和 DBS 中,大多数志愿者在用药后 48 小时仍可检测到目标物质。即使给药剂量相似,不同目标化合物的峰值浓度也不尽相同。此外,血清和 DBS 浓度之间也存在重复性差异。由于无法对水合状态和 OF 粘度进行归一化处理,因此对 OF 测量结果的解释具有挑战性。分析物浓度在冲洗期间稳步下降,但所有目标分析物在不同基质中的浓度并不相关。该研究重申了依靠尿液浓度来确定赛内用量所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Minimum Reporting Limits to Determine In-Competition Use of Stimulants.

The applicability of urinary minimum reporting limits (MRLs) to determine in-competition use of prohibited substances is an evolving topic. Most stimulants are subject to a universal MRL, despite the wide range of commercially available dosages for commonly used stimulants. Further, it is unknown whether the urinary MRL is reflective of a pharmacological dose ingested after the start of the in-competition period. To evaluate whether urinary MRLs can distinguish between in-competition and out-of-competition use, a controlled administration study was performed with three commonly used stimulants-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil at relatively low but therapeutically relevant dosages. Four to six volunteers were administered a particular drug once per day for five consecutive days. Urine, serum, dried blood spots (DBS), and oral fluid (OF) were collected during the active administration period and for 48 h after cessation of use. For all participants, urinary concentrations for all target analytes exceeded the MRL even 48 h after cessation of use. In serum and DBS, most volunteers showed detectable amounts at 48 h post use. Peak concentrations were variable between target compounds even with similar administered dosages. Further, there was a reproducible difference between serum and DBS concentrations. Interpretation of results from OF measurements was challenging due to the inability to normalize for hydration status and OF viscosity. Analyte concentrations decreased steadily over the washout period but did not correlate across matrices for all target analytes. The study reiterates the challenges associated with determining in-competition use by relying on urinary concentrations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信