Joelle T. Fathi DNP, MN, Angela M. Barry MA, Grant M. Greenberg MD, MHSA, MA, Claudia I. Henschke PhD, MD, Ella A. Kazerooni MD, MS, Jane J. Kim MD, MPH, Peter J. Mazzone MD, MPH, James L. Mulshine MD, Bruce S. Pyenson FSA, MAA, Lillie D. Shockney MAS, BS, Robert A. Smith PhD, Renda Soylemez Wiener MD, MPH, Charles S. White MD, Carey C. Thomson MD, MPH, for the ACS NLCRT Implementation Strategies Task Group
{"title":"美国癌症协会全国肺癌圆桌会议战略计划:实施高质量肺癌筛查。","authors":"Joelle T. Fathi DNP, MN, Angela M. Barry MA, Grant M. Greenberg MD, MHSA, MA, Claudia I. Henschke PhD, MD, Ella A. Kazerooni MD, MS, Jane J. Kim MD, MPH, Peter J. Mazzone MD, MPH, James L. Mulshine MD, Bruce S. Pyenson FSA, MAA, Lillie D. Shockney MAS, BS, Robert A. Smith PhD, Renda Soylemez Wiener MD, MPH, Charles S. White MD, Carey C. Thomson MD, MPH, for the ACS NLCRT Implementation Strategies Task Group","doi":"10.1002/cncr.34621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>More than a decade has passed since researchers in the Early Lung Cancer Action Project and the National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated the ability to save lives of high-risk individuals from lung cancer through regular screening by low dose computed tomography scan. The emergence of the most recent findings in the Dutch–Belgian lung-cancer screening trial (Nederlands–Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek [NELSON]) further strengthens and expands on this evidence. These studies demonstrate the benefit of integrating lung cancer screening into clinical practice, yet lung cancer continues to lead cancer mortality rates in the United States. Fewer than 20% of screen eligible individuals are enrolled in lung cancer screening, leaving millions of qualified individuals without the standard of care and benefit they deserve. This article, part of the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable (ACS NLCRT) strategic plan, examines the impediments to successful adoption, dissemination, and implementation of lung cancer screening. Proposed solutions identified by the ACS NLCRT Implementation Strategies Task Group and work currently underway to address these challenges to improve uptake of lung cancer screening are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain language summary</h3>\n \n <p>The evidence supporting the benefit of lung cancer screening in adults who previously or currently smoke has led to widespread endorsement and coverage by health plans. Lung cancer screening programs should be designed to promote high uptake rates of screening among eligible adults, and to deliver high-quality screening and follow-up care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 23","pages":"3961-3972"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.34621","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Implementation of high-quality lung cancer screening\",\"authors\":\"Joelle T. Fathi DNP, MN, Angela M. Barry MA, Grant M. Greenberg MD, MHSA, MA, Claudia I. Henschke PhD, MD, Ella A. Kazerooni MD, MS, Jane J. Kim MD, MPH, Peter J. Mazzone MD, MPH, James L. Mulshine MD, Bruce S. Pyenson FSA, MAA, Lillie D. Shockney MAS, BS, Robert A. Smith PhD, Renda Soylemez Wiener MD, MPH, Charles S. White MD, Carey C. Thomson MD, MPH, for the ACS NLCRT Implementation Strategies Task Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.34621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>More than a decade has passed since researchers in the Early Lung Cancer Action Project and the National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated the ability to save lives of high-risk individuals from lung cancer through regular screening by low dose computed tomography scan. The emergence of the most recent findings in the Dutch–Belgian lung-cancer screening trial (Nederlands–Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek [NELSON]) further strengthens and expands on this evidence. These studies demonstrate the benefit of integrating lung cancer screening into clinical practice, yet lung cancer continues to lead cancer mortality rates in the United States. Fewer than 20% of screen eligible individuals are enrolled in lung cancer screening, leaving millions of qualified individuals without the standard of care and benefit they deserve. This article, part of the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable (ACS NLCRT) strategic plan, examines the impediments to successful adoption, dissemination, and implementation of lung cancer screening. Proposed solutions identified by the ACS NLCRT Implementation Strategies Task Group and work currently underway to address these challenges to improve uptake of lung cancer screening are discussed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain language summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>The evidence supporting the benefit of lung cancer screening in adults who previously or currently smoke has led to widespread endorsement and coverage by health plans. Lung cancer screening programs should be designed to promote high uptake rates of screening among eligible adults, and to deliver high-quality screening and follow-up care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\"130 23\",\"pages\":\"3961-3972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.34621\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.34621\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.34621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Implementation of high-quality lung cancer screening
More than a decade has passed since researchers in the Early Lung Cancer Action Project and the National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated the ability to save lives of high-risk individuals from lung cancer through regular screening by low dose computed tomography scan. The emergence of the most recent findings in the Dutch–Belgian lung-cancer screening trial (Nederlands–Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek [NELSON]) further strengthens and expands on this evidence. These studies demonstrate the benefit of integrating lung cancer screening into clinical practice, yet lung cancer continues to lead cancer mortality rates in the United States. Fewer than 20% of screen eligible individuals are enrolled in lung cancer screening, leaving millions of qualified individuals without the standard of care and benefit they deserve. This article, part of the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable (ACS NLCRT) strategic plan, examines the impediments to successful adoption, dissemination, and implementation of lung cancer screening. Proposed solutions identified by the ACS NLCRT Implementation Strategies Task Group and work currently underway to address these challenges to improve uptake of lung cancer screening are discussed.
Plain language summary
The evidence supporting the benefit of lung cancer screening in adults who previously or currently smoke has led to widespread endorsement and coverage by health plans. Lung cancer screening programs should be designed to promote high uptake rates of screening among eligible adults, and to deliver high-quality screening and follow-up care.
期刊介绍:
The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society.
CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research