在黄土高原雨水灌溉条件下,黑色生物可降解地膜可提高谷物产量和净收益,同时减少碳足迹

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
{"title":"在黄土高原雨水灌溉条件下,黑色生物可降解地膜可提高谷物产量和净收益,同时减少碳足迹","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mulching with polyethylene film is a common technique in rain-fed regions used to address insufficient precipitation and heat, and thus promote crop growth, but it can lead to soil pollution from plastic residues. Biodegradable film mulch (BDM) is assumed to be a viable solution to address this concern. To evaluate the effects of polyethylene and biodegradable film mulching on socio-economic and environmental benefits, a two-year study was conducted on wheat. This experiment explored the influence of mulching practices differing in color and degradation: Black polyethylene mulching (Black PE), Black biodegradable mulching (Black BDM), Clear polyethylene mulching (Clear PE), Clear biodegradable mulching (Clear BDM) and No mulching (NM) on grain yield, economic benefits, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and carbon footprint (CF). In comparison with NM, all four film mulching treatments improved soil hydrothermal conditions. The Clear PE, Clear BDM, Black PE, and Black BDM increased average annual wheat yield by 40 %, 47 %, 47 %, and 60 %, respectively, compared to NM. Clear PE, Black BDM, and Black PE enhanced net returns (17–124 %) compared to NM. However, Clear PE and Clear BDM increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (43 % and 52 %) and net global warming potential (GWP) (49 % and 17 %) despite reducing yield-scaled GWP<sub>direct</sub> and CF compared to NM, likely due to higher wheat grain yields. In contrast, under Black BDM, GWP<sub>direct</sub> and yield-scaled GWP<sub>direct</sub> decreased significantly compared to NM (by 31 % and 58 %, respectively). When accounting for GHG emissions using soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates and life cycle assessment, the annual CF of Clear BDM, Black PE, and Black BDM was significantly lower by 21.9 %, 30.4 %, and 67.9 %, respectively, compared to NM. Black BDM exhibited the lowest net GWP (1682.3–1727.3 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ha<sup>−1</sup>) and CF (261.4–336.0 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq t<sup>−1</sup>), primarily attributed to increased SOC. In conclusion, the black biodegradable mulching might be a promising solution to enhance wheat grain yield and net returns while mitigate net GWP and CF, providing valuable technical guidance to promote a clean and sustainable agricultural production in rain-fed conditions, and possible support for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black biodegradable mulching increases grain yield and net return while decreasing carbon footprint in rain-fed conditions of the Loess Plateau\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mulching with polyethylene film is a common technique in rain-fed regions used to address insufficient precipitation and heat, and thus promote crop growth, but it can lead to soil pollution from plastic residues. Biodegradable film mulch (BDM) is assumed to be a viable solution to address this concern. To evaluate the effects of polyethylene and biodegradable film mulching on socio-economic and environmental benefits, a two-year study was conducted on wheat. This experiment explored the influence of mulching practices differing in color and degradation: Black polyethylene mulching (Black PE), Black biodegradable mulching (Black BDM), Clear polyethylene mulching (Clear PE), Clear biodegradable mulching (Clear BDM) and No mulching (NM) on grain yield, economic benefits, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and carbon footprint (CF). In comparison with NM, all four film mulching treatments improved soil hydrothermal conditions. The Clear PE, Clear BDM, Black PE, and Black BDM increased average annual wheat yield by 40 %, 47 %, 47 %, and 60 %, respectively, compared to NM. Clear PE, Black BDM, and Black PE enhanced net returns (17–124 %) compared to NM. However, Clear PE and Clear BDM increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (43 % and 52 %) and net global warming potential (GWP) (49 % and 17 %) despite reducing yield-scaled GWP<sub>direct</sub> and CF compared to NM, likely due to higher wheat grain yields. In contrast, under Black BDM, GWP<sub>direct</sub> and yield-scaled GWP<sub>direct</sub> decreased significantly compared to NM (by 31 % and 58 %, respectively). When accounting for GHG emissions using soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates and life cycle assessment, the annual CF of Clear BDM, Black PE, and Black BDM was significantly lower by 21.9 %, 30.4 %, and 67.9 %, respectively, compared to NM. Black BDM exhibited the lowest net GWP (1682.3–1727.3 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ha<sup>−1</sup>) and CF (261.4–336.0 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq t<sup>−1</sup>), primarily attributed to increased SOC. In conclusion, the black biodegradable mulching might be a promising solution to enhance wheat grain yield and net returns while mitigate net GWP and CF, providing valuable technical guidance to promote a clean and sustainable agricultural production in rain-fed conditions, and possible support for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003435\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在雨水充沛的地区,使用聚乙烯薄膜覆盖是一种常见的技术,用于解决降水和热量不足的问题,从而促进作物生长,但这种方法会导致塑料残留物对土壤造成污染。生物降解薄膜地膜(BDM)被认为是解决这一问题的可行方案。为了评估聚乙烯和生物降解薄膜地膜覆盖对社会经济和环境效益的影响,对小麦进行了一项为期两年的研究。这项实验探索了不同颜色和降解程度的地膜覆盖方法的影响:黑色聚乙烯地膜覆盖(Black PE)、黑色生物降解地膜覆盖(Black BDM)、透明聚乙烯地膜覆盖(Clear PE)、透明生物降解地膜覆盖(Clear BDM)和无地膜覆盖(NM)对谷物产量、经济效益、温室气体(GHG)排放和碳足迹(CF)的影响。与 NM 相比,所有四种薄膜覆盖处理都改善了土壤水热条件。与 NM 相比,Clear PE、Clear BDM、Black PE 和 Black BDM 的小麦平均年产量分别提高了 40%、47%、47% 和 60%。与 NM 相比,Clear PE、Black BDM 和 Black PE 提高了净收益(17-124%)。然而,与正常年份相比,清明节 PE 和清明节 BDM 虽然降低了收益标度 GWPdirect 和 CF,但却增加了二氧化碳排放量(43 % 和 52 %)和净全球升温潜能值 (GWP) (49 % 和 17 %),这可能是由于小麦产量提高所致。相比之下,在黑色 BDM 条件下,GWPdirect 和产量标度 GWPdirect 与 NM 相比显著降低(分别降低了 31% 和 58%)。在利用土壤有机碳(SOC)固存率和生命周期评估计算温室气体排放量时,与正常年份相比,透明 BDM、黑色 PE 和黑色 BDM 的年 CF 分别显著降低了 21.9 %、30.4 % 和 67.9 %。黑色 BDM 的净 GWP(1682.3-1727.3 千克二氧化碳当量公顷-1)和 CF(261.4-336.0 千克二氧化碳当量吨-1)最低,这主要归因于 SOC 的增加。总之,黑色可生物降解地膜覆盖可能是提高小麦产量和净收益,同时降低净全球升温潜能值和二氧化碳当量的一种有前途的解决方案,为促进雨水灌溉条件下的清洁和可持续农业生产提供了有价值的技术指导,并为未来的研究提供了可能的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Black biodegradable mulching increases grain yield and net return while decreasing carbon footprint in rain-fed conditions of the Loess Plateau
Mulching with polyethylene film is a common technique in rain-fed regions used to address insufficient precipitation and heat, and thus promote crop growth, but it can lead to soil pollution from plastic residues. Biodegradable film mulch (BDM) is assumed to be a viable solution to address this concern. To evaluate the effects of polyethylene and biodegradable film mulching on socio-economic and environmental benefits, a two-year study was conducted on wheat. This experiment explored the influence of mulching practices differing in color and degradation: Black polyethylene mulching (Black PE), Black biodegradable mulching (Black BDM), Clear polyethylene mulching (Clear PE), Clear biodegradable mulching (Clear BDM) and No mulching (NM) on grain yield, economic benefits, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and carbon footprint (CF). In comparison with NM, all four film mulching treatments improved soil hydrothermal conditions. The Clear PE, Clear BDM, Black PE, and Black BDM increased average annual wheat yield by 40 %, 47 %, 47 %, and 60 %, respectively, compared to NM. Clear PE, Black BDM, and Black PE enhanced net returns (17–124 %) compared to NM. However, Clear PE and Clear BDM increased CO2 emissions (43 % and 52 %) and net global warming potential (GWP) (49 % and 17 %) despite reducing yield-scaled GWPdirect and CF compared to NM, likely due to higher wheat grain yields. In contrast, under Black BDM, GWPdirect and yield-scaled GWPdirect decreased significantly compared to NM (by 31 % and 58 %, respectively). When accounting for GHG emissions using soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates and life cycle assessment, the annual CF of Clear BDM, Black PE, and Black BDM was significantly lower by 21.9 %, 30.4 %, and 67.9 %, respectively, compared to NM. Black BDM exhibited the lowest net GWP (1682.3–1727.3 kg CO2-eq ha−1) and CF (261.4–336.0 kg CO2-eq t−1), primarily attributed to increased SOC. In conclusion, the black biodegradable mulching might be a promising solution to enhance wheat grain yield and net returns while mitigate net GWP and CF, providing valuable technical guidance to promote a clean and sustainable agricultural production in rain-fed conditions, and possible support for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信