Himanshi Gupta , Prithvi Pal Singh , S.G. Eswara Reddy
{"title":"探索新鲜和废弃柠檬皮(Citrus limon)精油的化学成分和杀虫特性对脉冲甲虫的作用","authors":"Himanshi Gupta , Prithvi Pal Singh , S.G. Eswara Reddy","doi":"10.1016/j.ibiod.2024.105924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Essential oil (EO) of <em>Citrus limon</em> fresh (LF) and lemon waste peel (LW) was extracted using the hydro distillation method. A total of 17 chemical constituents (97.02–97.26%) were identified using GC, GC-MS, and NMR techniques. Major monoterpene hydrocarbons including d-limonene (52.42–54.17%), <em>α</em>-terpineol (16.82–21.15%), <em>β</em>-pinene (6.74–9.15%) and <em>γ</em>-terpinene (2.16–3.59%) were further identified using <sup>1</sup>H and <sup>13</sup>C NMR analysis. Furthermore, extracted EOs, their synergistic combinations and major constituent (d-limonene) were evaluated for fumigant toxicity, repellence, and ovipositional inhibitory (OI) potential using without food and with food conditions against pulse beetle, <em>Callosobruchus chinensis</em> and <em>Callosobruchus maculatus.</em> d-limonene was found to be most effective against <em>C. chinensis</em> and <em>C. maculatus</em> followed by LW oil in all the evaluated assays. EO of LW was found more effective against <em>C. chinensis</em> (LC<sub>50</sub> = 2899.11 μl L<sup>−1</sup>) without food after 96 h than lemon fresh. Among synergistic combinations, LW and LF at 3:1 ratio without food reported more effective to <em>C. chinensis</em> (LC<sub>50</sub> = 277.85 μl L<sup>−1</sup>) and <em>C. maculatus</em> (LC<sub>50</sub> = 322.38 μl L<sup>−1</sup>) without food after 96 h. In repellent assay, EO of LW also displayed higher repellent to both species (RC<sub>50</sub> = 430.71 to 525.56 and μl L<sup>−1</sup>). EO of LW showed higher OI (50.14 ± 3.09%) against <em>C. chinensis</em> at higher concentration after 24 h. EOs of LF and LW also inhibited glutathione -S-transferase and acetylcholine esterase activity in <em>C. chinensis</em> and <em>C. maculatus.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":13643,"journal":{"name":"International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105924"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830524001951/pdfft?md5=39d31776ef419da1b48350dfda38dd6f&pid=1-s2.0-S0964830524001951-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the chemical profiling and insecticidal properties of essential oils from fresh and discarded lemon peels, Citrus limon against pulse beetle\",\"authors\":\"Himanshi Gupta , Prithvi Pal Singh , S.G. Eswara Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibiod.2024.105924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Essential oil (EO) of <em>Citrus limon</em> fresh (LF) and lemon waste peel (LW) was extracted using the hydro distillation method. A total of 17 chemical constituents (97.02–97.26%) were identified using GC, GC-MS, and NMR techniques. Major monoterpene hydrocarbons including d-limonene (52.42–54.17%), <em>α</em>-terpineol (16.82–21.15%), <em>β</em>-pinene (6.74–9.15%) and <em>γ</em>-terpinene (2.16–3.59%) were further identified using <sup>1</sup>H and <sup>13</sup>C NMR analysis. Furthermore, extracted EOs, their synergistic combinations and major constituent (d-limonene) were evaluated for fumigant toxicity, repellence, and ovipositional inhibitory (OI) potential using without food and with food conditions against pulse beetle, <em>Callosobruchus chinensis</em> and <em>Callosobruchus maculatus.</em> d-limonene was found to be most effective against <em>C. chinensis</em> and <em>C. maculatus</em> followed by LW oil in all the evaluated assays. EO of LW was found more effective against <em>C. chinensis</em> (LC<sub>50</sub> = 2899.11 μl L<sup>−1</sup>) without food after 96 h than lemon fresh. Among synergistic combinations, LW and LF at 3:1 ratio without food reported more effective to <em>C. chinensis</em> (LC<sub>50</sub> = 277.85 μl L<sup>−1</sup>) and <em>C. maculatus</em> (LC<sub>50</sub> = 322.38 μl L<sup>−1</sup>) without food after 96 h. In repellent assay, EO of LW also displayed higher repellent to both species (RC<sub>50</sub> = 430.71 to 525.56 and μl L<sup>−1</sup>). EO of LW showed higher OI (50.14 ± 3.09%) against <em>C. chinensis</em> at higher concentration after 24 h. EOs of LF and LW also inhibited glutathione -S-transferase and acetylcholine esterase activity in <em>C. chinensis</em> and <em>C. maculatus.</em></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830524001951/pdfft?md5=39d31776ef419da1b48350dfda38dd6f&pid=1-s2.0-S0964830524001951-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830524001951\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830524001951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the chemical profiling and insecticidal properties of essential oils from fresh and discarded lemon peels, Citrus limon against pulse beetle
Essential oil (EO) of Citrus limon fresh (LF) and lemon waste peel (LW) was extracted using the hydro distillation method. A total of 17 chemical constituents (97.02–97.26%) were identified using GC, GC-MS, and NMR techniques. Major monoterpene hydrocarbons including d-limonene (52.42–54.17%), α-terpineol (16.82–21.15%), β-pinene (6.74–9.15%) and γ-terpinene (2.16–3.59%) were further identified using 1H and 13C NMR analysis. Furthermore, extracted EOs, their synergistic combinations and major constituent (d-limonene) were evaluated for fumigant toxicity, repellence, and ovipositional inhibitory (OI) potential using without food and with food conditions against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus. d-limonene was found to be most effective against C. chinensis and C. maculatus followed by LW oil in all the evaluated assays. EO of LW was found more effective against C. chinensis (LC50 = 2899.11 μl L−1) without food after 96 h than lemon fresh. Among synergistic combinations, LW and LF at 3:1 ratio without food reported more effective to C. chinensis (LC50 = 277.85 μl L−1) and C. maculatus (LC50 = 322.38 μl L−1) without food after 96 h. In repellent assay, EO of LW also displayed higher repellent to both species (RC50 = 430.71 to 525.56 and μl L−1). EO of LW showed higher OI (50.14 ± 3.09%) against C. chinensis at higher concentration after 24 h. EOs of LF and LW also inhibited glutathione -S-transferase and acetylcholine esterase activity in C. chinensis and C. maculatus.
期刊介绍:
International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation publishes original research papers and reviews on the biological causes of deterioration or degradation.