企业抵押排放权对环境意味着什么?企业绿色投资的证据

IF 2.1 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Qun Wang , Yongliang Zeng , Xiangfang Zhao
{"title":"企业抵押排放权对环境意味着什么?企业绿色投资的证据","authors":"Qun Wang ,&nbsp;Yongliang Zeng ,&nbsp;Xiangfang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on a sample of Chinese heavily polluting firms from 2008 to 2019, we examine the impact of the adoption of the emissions rights mortgage (ERM) policy on firm-level green investment. We find that an ERM policy significantly enhances firms’ green investment. This effect is more salient when financial constraints are higher, local marketization levels are higher, and local governments’ environmental concerns are higher. Our study provides empirical evidence and policy implementations for the further development of financial instruments based on emissions rights and other environmental rights, which show that ERM is a sound policy to promote a sustainable environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 111988"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does it mean to the environment when a firm mortgages its emission rights? Evidence from corporate green investment\",\"authors\":\"Qun Wang ,&nbsp;Yongliang Zeng ,&nbsp;Xiangfang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Based on a sample of Chinese heavily polluting firms from 2008 to 2019, we examine the impact of the adoption of the emissions rights mortgage (ERM) policy on firm-level green investment. We find that an ERM policy significantly enhances firms’ green investment. This effect is more salient when financial constraints are higher, local marketization levels are higher, and local governments’ environmental concerns are higher. Our study provides empirical evidence and policy implementations for the further development of financial instruments based on emissions rights and other environmental rights, which show that ERM is a sound policy to promote a sustainable environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"244 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176524004725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176524004725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于 2008 年至 2019 年中国重污染企业的样本,我们研究了采用排污权抵押贷款(ERM)政策对企业层面绿色投资的影响。我们发现,排污权抵押贷款政策能显著提高企业的绿色投资。当金融约束较高、地方市场化水平较高以及地方政府对环境的关注度较高时,这种影响会更加明显。我们的研究为进一步发展基于排污权和其他环境权的金融工具提供了经验证据和政策实施,表明企业环境风险管理是促进环境可持续发展的合理政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What does it mean to the environment when a firm mortgages its emission rights? Evidence from corporate green investment

Based on a sample of Chinese heavily polluting firms from 2008 to 2019, we examine the impact of the adoption of the emissions rights mortgage (ERM) policy on firm-level green investment. We find that an ERM policy significantly enhances firms’ green investment. This effect is more salient when financial constraints are higher, local marketization levels are higher, and local governments’ environmental concerns are higher. Our study provides empirical evidence and policy implementations for the further development of financial instruments based on emissions rights and other environmental rights, which show that ERM is a sound policy to promote a sustainable environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信