评估同位素降雨-径流模型的输入数据源

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Andrew Watson, Christian Birkel, Saul Arciniega-Esparza, Jan de Waal, Jodie Miller, Yuliya Vystavna, Jared van Rooyen, Angela Welham, Hayoung Bong, Kei Yoshimura, Jörg Helmschrot, Annika Künne, Sven Kralisch
{"title":"评估同位素降雨-径流模型的输入数据源","authors":"Andrew Watson,&nbsp;Christian Birkel,&nbsp;Saul Arciniega-Esparza,&nbsp;Jan de Waal,&nbsp;Jodie Miller,&nbsp;Yuliya Vystavna,&nbsp;Jared van Rooyen,&nbsp;Angela Welham,&nbsp;Hayoung Bong,&nbsp;Kei Yoshimura,&nbsp;Jörg Helmschrot,&nbsp;Annika Künne,&nbsp;Sven Kralisch","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Isotope-enabled models provide a means to generate robust hydrological simulations. However, daily isotope-enabled rainfall-runoff models applied to larger spatial scales (&gt;100 km<sup>2</sup>) require more input data than conventional non-isotope models in the form of precipitation isotope time series, which are difficult to generate even with point station measurements. Spatially distributed isotope data can be circumvented by isotope-enabled climate models. Here, we evaluate the hydrological simulations of the J2000-isotope enabled hydrological model driven with data from corrected and un-corrected isotope-enabled global and regional climate models (isotope-enabled global spectral model [IsoGSM] and isotope-enabled regional spectral model [IsoRSM], respectively) compared with 1 year of measured reference station and a yearly average precipitation isotope input for a pilot site, the data-scarce sub-humid Eerste River catchment in South Africa. The models driven by all input products performed well for upstream and downstream discharge gauges with Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) from 0.58 to 0.85 and LogNSE of 0.66 to 0.93. The simulated δ<sup>2</sup>H stream isotopes using the reference J2000-iso and J2000-isoRSM were good for the main river with a stream Kling Gupta efficiency (KGE) of between 0.4–0.9 and the top 100 Monte Carlo simulations varying by around 5‰ for δ<sup>2</sup>H. For smaller tributaries the model was unable to capture the measured stream isotopes due to biased precipitation isotope inputs. Adjusting the J2000-iso with a bias corrected IsoRSM improved the stream and groundwater isotope simulation and outperformed the model driven by an average yearly precipitation isotope input. Differences in simulated hydrological processes were only evident between the models when evaluating percolation with unrealistic simulations for the standard J2000 model. While the regional climate model is computationally more intensive than its global counterpart, it provided better stream isotope simulations and improvements to simulated percolation. Our results indicate that isotope-enabled climate models can provide useful input data in data scarce regions for hydrological models, where improved water management to address climate change impacts is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"38 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.15276","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating input data sources for isotope-enabled rainfall-runoff models\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Watson,&nbsp;Christian Birkel,&nbsp;Saul Arciniega-Esparza,&nbsp;Jan de Waal,&nbsp;Jodie Miller,&nbsp;Yuliya Vystavna,&nbsp;Jared van Rooyen,&nbsp;Angela Welham,&nbsp;Hayoung Bong,&nbsp;Kei Yoshimura,&nbsp;Jörg Helmschrot,&nbsp;Annika Künne,&nbsp;Sven Kralisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.15276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Isotope-enabled models provide a means to generate robust hydrological simulations. However, daily isotope-enabled rainfall-runoff models applied to larger spatial scales (&gt;100 km<sup>2</sup>) require more input data than conventional non-isotope models in the form of precipitation isotope time series, which are difficult to generate even with point station measurements. Spatially distributed isotope data can be circumvented by isotope-enabled climate models. Here, we evaluate the hydrological simulations of the J2000-isotope enabled hydrological model driven with data from corrected and un-corrected isotope-enabled global and regional climate models (isotope-enabled global spectral model [IsoGSM] and isotope-enabled regional spectral model [IsoRSM], respectively) compared with 1 year of measured reference station and a yearly average precipitation isotope input for a pilot site, the data-scarce sub-humid Eerste River catchment in South Africa. The models driven by all input products performed well for upstream and downstream discharge gauges with Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) from 0.58 to 0.85 and LogNSE of 0.66 to 0.93. The simulated δ<sup>2</sup>H stream isotopes using the reference J2000-iso and J2000-isoRSM were good for the main river with a stream Kling Gupta efficiency (KGE) of between 0.4–0.9 and the top 100 Monte Carlo simulations varying by around 5‰ for δ<sup>2</sup>H. For smaller tributaries the model was unable to capture the measured stream isotopes due to biased precipitation isotope inputs. Adjusting the J2000-iso with a bias corrected IsoRSM improved the stream and groundwater isotope simulation and outperformed the model driven by an average yearly precipitation isotope input. Differences in simulated hydrological processes were only evident between the models when evaluating percolation with unrealistic simulations for the standard J2000 model. While the regional climate model is computationally more intensive than its global counterpart, it provided better stream isotope simulations and improvements to simulated percolation. Our results indicate that isotope-enabled climate models can provide useful input data in data scarce regions for hydrological models, where improved water management to address climate change impacts is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"38 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.15276\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15276\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同位素模型为生成可靠的水文模拟提供了一种方法。然而,与传统的非同位素模型相比,应用于较大空间尺度(100 平方公里)的日同位素降雨-径流模型需要更多的降水同位素时间序列形式的输入数据,而这些数据即使通过点站测量也很难生成。同位素气候模型可以避开空间分布的同位素数据。在这里,我们评估了 J2000-同位素水文模型的水文模拟情况,该模型由修正和未修正的同位素全球和区域气候模型(分别为同位素全球光谱模型[IsoGSM]和同位素区域光谱模型[IsoRSM])的数据驱动,并与 1 年实测参考站和年平均降水量同位素输入进行了比较。由所有输入产品驱动的模型在上游和下游排放测量方面表现良好,纳什-苏克里夫效率(NSE)为 0.58 至 0.85,对数 NSE 为 0.66 至 0.93。使用参考模型 J2000-iso 和 J2000-isoRSM 模拟的 δ2H 流同位素在主河道表现良好,流 Kling Gupta 效率(KGE)在 0.4-0.9 之间,前 100 个蒙特卡罗模拟的 δ2H 偏差在 5‰左右。对于较小的支流,由于降水同位素输入的偏差,模型无法捕捉到测量到的溪流同位素。用偏差校正 IsoRSM 调整 J2000-iso 后,溪流和地下水同位素模拟效果有所改善,优于由年均降水同位素输入驱动的模型。只有在评估标准 J2000 模型不切实际的模拟渗流时,模型之间模拟的水文过程才会出现明显差异。虽然区域气候模式的计算量比全球模式大,但它提供了更好的溪流同位素模拟,并改进了模拟渗流。我们的研究结果表明,在需要改进水资源管理以应对气候变化影响的数据匮乏地区,同位素气候模型可以为水文模型提供有用的输入数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating input data sources for isotope-enabled rainfall-runoff models

Evaluating input data sources for isotope-enabled rainfall-runoff models

Isotope-enabled models provide a means to generate robust hydrological simulations. However, daily isotope-enabled rainfall-runoff models applied to larger spatial scales (>100 km2) require more input data than conventional non-isotope models in the form of precipitation isotope time series, which are difficult to generate even with point station measurements. Spatially distributed isotope data can be circumvented by isotope-enabled climate models. Here, we evaluate the hydrological simulations of the J2000-isotope enabled hydrological model driven with data from corrected and un-corrected isotope-enabled global and regional climate models (isotope-enabled global spectral model [IsoGSM] and isotope-enabled regional spectral model [IsoRSM], respectively) compared with 1 year of measured reference station and a yearly average precipitation isotope input for a pilot site, the data-scarce sub-humid Eerste River catchment in South Africa. The models driven by all input products performed well for upstream and downstream discharge gauges with Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) from 0.58 to 0.85 and LogNSE of 0.66 to 0.93. The simulated δ2H stream isotopes using the reference J2000-iso and J2000-isoRSM were good for the main river with a stream Kling Gupta efficiency (KGE) of between 0.4–0.9 and the top 100 Monte Carlo simulations varying by around 5‰ for δ2H. For smaller tributaries the model was unable to capture the measured stream isotopes due to biased precipitation isotope inputs. Adjusting the J2000-iso with a bias corrected IsoRSM improved the stream and groundwater isotope simulation and outperformed the model driven by an average yearly precipitation isotope input. Differences in simulated hydrological processes were only evident between the models when evaluating percolation with unrealistic simulations for the standard J2000 model. While the regional climate model is computationally more intensive than its global counterpart, it provided better stream isotope simulations and improvements to simulated percolation. Our results indicate that isotope-enabled climate models can provide useful input data in data scarce regions for hydrological models, where improved water management to address climate change impacts is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信