慢性疼痛是由中枢敏感化引起的吗?回顾与批判性观点

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Enrique Velasco , Mar Flores-Cortés , Javier Guerra-Armas , Laura Flix-Díez , Francisco Gurdiel-Álvarez , Aser Donado-Bermejo , Emanuel N. van den Broeke , Laura Pérez-Cervera , Miguel Delicado-Miralles
{"title":"慢性疼痛是由中枢敏感化引起的吗?回顾与批判性观点","authors":"Enrique Velasco ,&nbsp;Mar Flores-Cortés ,&nbsp;Javier Guerra-Armas ,&nbsp;Laura Flix-Díez ,&nbsp;Francisco Gurdiel-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Aser Donado-Bermejo ,&nbsp;Emanuel N. van den Broeke ,&nbsp;Laura Pérez-Cervera ,&nbsp;Miguel Delicado-Miralles","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chronic pain causes disability and loss of health worldwide. Yet, a mechanistic explanation for it is still missing. Frequently, neural phenomena, and among them, Central Sensitization (CS), is presented as causing chronic pain. This narrative review explores the evidence substantiating the relationship between CS and chronic pain: four expert researchers were divided in two independent teams that reviewed the available evidence. Three criteria were established for a study to demonstrate a causal relationship: (1) confirm presence of CS, (2) study chronic pain, and (3) test sufficiency or necessity of CS over chronic pain symptoms. No study met those criteria, failing to demonstrate that CS can cause chronic pain. Also, no evidence reporting the occurrence of CS in humans was found. Worryingly, pain assessments are often confounded with CS measures in the literature, omitting that the latter is a neurophysiological and not a perceptual phenomenon. Future research should avoid this misconception to directly interrogate what is the causal contribution of CS to chronic pain to better comprehend this problematic condition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 105886"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is chronic pain caused by central sensitization? A review and critical point of view\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Velasco ,&nbsp;Mar Flores-Cortés ,&nbsp;Javier Guerra-Armas ,&nbsp;Laura Flix-Díez ,&nbsp;Francisco Gurdiel-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Aser Donado-Bermejo ,&nbsp;Emanuel N. van den Broeke ,&nbsp;Laura Pérez-Cervera ,&nbsp;Miguel Delicado-Miralles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Chronic pain causes disability and loss of health worldwide. Yet, a mechanistic explanation for it is still missing. Frequently, neural phenomena, and among them, Central Sensitization (CS), is presented as causing chronic pain. This narrative review explores the evidence substantiating the relationship between CS and chronic pain: four expert researchers were divided in two independent teams that reviewed the available evidence. Three criteria were established for a study to demonstrate a causal relationship: (1) confirm presence of CS, (2) study chronic pain, and (3) test sufficiency or necessity of CS over chronic pain symptoms. No study met those criteria, failing to demonstrate that CS can cause chronic pain. Also, no evidence reporting the occurrence of CS in humans was found. Worryingly, pain assessments are often confounded with CS measures in the literature, omitting that the latter is a neurophysiological and not a perceptual phenomenon. Future research should avoid this misconception to directly interrogate what is the causal contribution of CS to chronic pain to better comprehend this problematic condition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424003555\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424003555","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性疼痛在全球范围内造成残疾和健康损失。然而,人们仍然缺乏对其的机理解释。神经现象经常被认为是导致慢性疼痛的原因,其中包括中枢敏化(CS)。这篇叙述性综述探讨了证实 CS 与慢性疼痛之间关系的证据:四位专家研究员分成两个独立小组,对现有证据进行审查。为证明因果关系的研究制定了三个标准:(1)确认 CS 的存在;(2)研究慢性疼痛;(3)测试 CS 对慢性疼痛症状的充分性或必要性。没有一项研究符合这些标准,未能证明 CS 可导致慢性疼痛。此外,也没有发现任何证据报告 CS 发生在人类身上。令人担忧的是,文献中经常将疼痛评估与 CS 测量混为一谈,忽略了后者是一种神经生理现象而非知觉现象。未来的研究应避免这种误解,直接探究 CS 与慢性疼痛的因果关系,从而更好地理解这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is chronic pain caused by central sensitization? A review and critical point of view

Chronic pain causes disability and loss of health worldwide. Yet, a mechanistic explanation for it is still missing. Frequently, neural phenomena, and among them, Central Sensitization (CS), is presented as causing chronic pain. This narrative review explores the evidence substantiating the relationship between CS and chronic pain: four expert researchers were divided in two independent teams that reviewed the available evidence. Three criteria were established for a study to demonstrate a causal relationship: (1) confirm presence of CS, (2) study chronic pain, and (3) test sufficiency or necessity of CS over chronic pain symptoms. No study met those criteria, failing to demonstrate that CS can cause chronic pain. Also, no evidence reporting the occurrence of CS in humans was found. Worryingly, pain assessments are often confounded with CS measures in the literature, omitting that the latter is a neurophysiological and not a perceptual phenomenon. Future research should avoid this misconception to directly interrogate what is the causal contribution of CS to chronic pain to better comprehend this problematic condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信