从概率角度更新优势选择法(CBA):住宅楼供暖系统的选择

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sofía Miranda-Quiñones , Rodrigo F. Herrera , Edison Atencio , Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera , Paz Arroyo
{"title":"从概率角度更新优势选择法(CBA):住宅楼供暖系统的选择","authors":"Sofía Miranda-Quiñones ,&nbsp;Rodrigo F. Herrera ,&nbsp;Edison Atencio ,&nbsp;Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera ,&nbsp;Paz Arroyo","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2024.102977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Choosing by Advantages (CBA) is a multi-criteria decision-making method, based on the importance of advantages, under a collaborative and transparent context, avoiding basing decisions on assumptions or previous experiences. Currently, the CBA application process excludes the uncertainty and variability inherent to the performance of alternatives involved in a decision-making process. Therefore, the objective of this work was to create a new proposal of the CBA method, which incorporates probabilistic on the attributes of the alternatives in the process of choosing, seeking to close the gap that the traditional CBA has in terms of the lack of incorporation of the uncertainty to which certain data could be affected. To validate the probabilistic CBA method, a simulation focused on an application case framed within the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, related to energy consumption in residential buildings, is carried out to select a heating system. The study demonstrates that the probabilistic CBA method enhances transparency and collaboration in decision-making by quantifying uncertainty and involving stakeholders in a structured process. Monte Carlo simulations provided a comprehensive view of potential outcomes, helping to identify the most advantageous alternative with a high probability of achieving significant benefits. This research seeks to contribute to the knowledge of the CBA method and provide greater versatility to its application, reaching use in any situation or area of performance, allowing to be a guide for decision-makers involving multiple criteria and variability in the attributes of the alternatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"15 10","pages":"Article 102977"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003526/pdfft?md5=fd6a7e7992c4ebdf4bc641d1171aa9d7&pid=1-s2.0-S2090447924003526-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An update of the choosing by advantages (CBA) method from a probabilistic perspective: The selection of a heating system in a residential building\",\"authors\":\"Sofía Miranda-Quiñones ,&nbsp;Rodrigo F. Herrera ,&nbsp;Edison Atencio ,&nbsp;Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera ,&nbsp;Paz Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asej.2024.102977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Choosing by Advantages (CBA) is a multi-criteria decision-making method, based on the importance of advantages, under a collaborative and transparent context, avoiding basing decisions on assumptions or previous experiences. Currently, the CBA application process excludes the uncertainty and variability inherent to the performance of alternatives involved in a decision-making process. Therefore, the objective of this work was to create a new proposal of the CBA method, which incorporates probabilistic on the attributes of the alternatives in the process of choosing, seeking to close the gap that the traditional CBA has in terms of the lack of incorporation of the uncertainty to which certain data could be affected. To validate the probabilistic CBA method, a simulation focused on an application case framed within the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, related to energy consumption in residential buildings, is carried out to select a heating system. The study demonstrates that the probabilistic CBA method enhances transparency and collaboration in decision-making by quantifying uncertainty and involving stakeholders in a structured process. Monte Carlo simulations provided a comprehensive view of potential outcomes, helping to identify the most advantageous alternative with a high probability of achieving significant benefits. This research seeks to contribute to the knowledge of the CBA method and provide greater versatility to its application, reaching use in any situation or area of performance, allowing to be a guide for decision-makers involving multiple criteria and variability in the attributes of the alternatives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 102977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003526/pdfft?md5=fd6a7e7992c4ebdf4bc641d1171aa9d7&pid=1-s2.0-S2090447924003526-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924003526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优势选择法(CBA)是一种多标准决策方法,以优势的重要性为基础,在合作和透明的环境下进行,避免根据假设或以往的经验做出决策。目前,CBA 的应用过程排除了决策过程中所涉及的备选方案性能固有的不确定性和可变性。因此,这项工作的目标是创建一种新的成本效益分析方法,在选择过程中对替代品的属性进行概率分析,以弥补传统的成本效益分析在缺乏对某些数据可能受到影响的不确定性进行分析方面的不足。为了验证概率 CBA 方法,我们对建筑、工程和施工(AEC)行业中的一个应用案例进行了模拟,该案例与住宅建筑的能源消耗有关,旨在选择一种供暖系统。研究表明,概率 CBA 方法通过量化不确定性和让利益相关者参与结构化过程,提高了决策的透明度和协作性。蒙特卡罗模拟提供了对潜在结果的全面认识,有助于确定最有利的替代方案,并有很大可能实现显著效益。这项研究旨在促进对成本效益分析方法的了解,并为其应用提供更大的通用性,使其适用于任何情况或绩效领域,为决策者提供指导,其中涉及多种标准和替代品属性的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An update of the choosing by advantages (CBA) method from a probabilistic perspective: The selection of a heating system in a residential building

Choosing by Advantages (CBA) is a multi-criteria decision-making method, based on the importance of advantages, under a collaborative and transparent context, avoiding basing decisions on assumptions or previous experiences. Currently, the CBA application process excludes the uncertainty and variability inherent to the performance of alternatives involved in a decision-making process. Therefore, the objective of this work was to create a new proposal of the CBA method, which incorporates probabilistic on the attributes of the alternatives in the process of choosing, seeking to close the gap that the traditional CBA has in terms of the lack of incorporation of the uncertainty to which certain data could be affected. To validate the probabilistic CBA method, a simulation focused on an application case framed within the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, related to energy consumption in residential buildings, is carried out to select a heating system. The study demonstrates that the probabilistic CBA method enhances transparency and collaboration in decision-making by quantifying uncertainty and involving stakeholders in a structured process. Monte Carlo simulations provided a comprehensive view of potential outcomes, helping to identify the most advantageous alternative with a high probability of achieving significant benefits. This research seeks to contribute to the knowledge of the CBA method and provide greater versatility to its application, reaching use in any situation or area of performance, allowing to be a guide for decision-makers involving multiple criteria and variability in the attributes of the alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
441
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信