有认知障碍和体弱的住院者和无认知障碍和体弱的住院者使用强效抗胆碱能药物的普遍程度:对 12 个亚太和欧洲国家 106 家养老院的分析

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Amanda J. Cross , Emanuele R. Villani , Agathe D. Jadczak , Kaisu Pitkälä , Shota Hamada , Meng Zhao , Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia , Ulla Aalto , Laura A. Dowd , Li Li , Shin J. Liau , Rosa Liperoti , Nicolás Martínez-Velilla , Choon Ean Ooi , Graziano Onder , Kate Petrie , Hanna M. Roitto , Victoria Roncal-Belzunce , Riitta Saarela , Nobuo Sakata , J. Simon Bell
{"title":"有认知障碍和体弱的住院者和无认知障碍和体弱的住院者使用强效抗胆碱能药物的普遍程度:对 12 个亚太和欧洲国家 106 家养老院的分析","authors":"Amanda J. Cross ,&nbsp;Emanuele R. Villani ,&nbsp;Agathe D. Jadczak ,&nbsp;Kaisu Pitkälä ,&nbsp;Shota Hamada ,&nbsp;Meng Zhao ,&nbsp;Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia ,&nbsp;Ulla Aalto ,&nbsp;Laura A. Dowd ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Shin J. Liau ,&nbsp;Rosa Liperoti ,&nbsp;Nicolás Martínez-Velilla ,&nbsp;Choon Ean Ooi ,&nbsp;Graziano Onder ,&nbsp;Kate Petrie ,&nbsp;Hanna M. Roitto ,&nbsp;Victoria Roncal-Belzunce ,&nbsp;Riitta Saarela ,&nbsp;Nobuo Sakata ,&nbsp;J. Simon Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>There is a need to balance the benefits and risks associated with strong anticholinergic medications in older adults, particularly among those with frailty and cognitive impairment. This study explored the international prevalence of strong anticholinergic medication use in residents of nursing homes with and without cognitive impairment and frailty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Secondary, cross-sectional analyses of data from 5,800 residents of 106 nursing homes in Australia, China, Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, and Spain were conducted. Strong anticholinergic medications were defined as medications with a score of 2 or 3 on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale. Dementia or cognitive impairment was defined as a documented diagnosis or using a validated scale. Frailty was defined using the FRAIL-NH scale as 0–2 (non-frail), 3–6 (frail) and 7–14 (most-frail). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 17.4 % (n = 1010) residents used ≥1 strong anticholinergic medication, ranging from 1.3 % (n = 2) in China to 27.1 % (n = 147) in Italy. The most prevalent strong anticholinergics were quetiapine (n = 290, 5.0 % of all residents), olanzapine (132, 2.3 %), carbamazepine (102, 1.8 %), paroxetine (88, 1.5 %) and amitriptyline (87, 1.5 %). Prevalence was higher among residents with cognitive impairment (n = 602, 17.9 %) compared to those without (n = 408, 16.8 %), and among residents who were most frail (n = 553, 17.9 %) compared to those who were frail (n = 286, 16.5 %) or non-frail (n = 171, 17.5 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>One in six residents who were most frail and living with cognitive impairment used a strong anticholinergic. However, there was a 20-fold variation in prevalence across the 12 countries. Targeted deprescribing interventions may reduce potentially avoidable medication-harm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003121/pdfft?md5=4af0421a68b14f894d007038945432d7&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324003121-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of strong anticholinergic use in residents with and without cognitive impairment and frailty: Analysis from 106 nursing homes in 12 Asia-Pacific and European countries\",\"authors\":\"Amanda J. Cross ,&nbsp;Emanuele R. Villani ,&nbsp;Agathe D. Jadczak ,&nbsp;Kaisu Pitkälä ,&nbsp;Shota Hamada ,&nbsp;Meng Zhao ,&nbsp;Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia ,&nbsp;Ulla Aalto ,&nbsp;Laura A. Dowd ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Shin J. Liau ,&nbsp;Rosa Liperoti ,&nbsp;Nicolás Martínez-Velilla ,&nbsp;Choon Ean Ooi ,&nbsp;Graziano Onder ,&nbsp;Kate Petrie ,&nbsp;Hanna M. Roitto ,&nbsp;Victoria Roncal-Belzunce ,&nbsp;Riitta Saarela ,&nbsp;Nobuo Sakata ,&nbsp;J. Simon Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>There is a need to balance the benefits and risks associated with strong anticholinergic medications in older adults, particularly among those with frailty and cognitive impairment. This study explored the international prevalence of strong anticholinergic medication use in residents of nursing homes with and without cognitive impairment and frailty.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Secondary, cross-sectional analyses of data from 5,800 residents of 106 nursing homes in Australia, China, Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, and Spain were conducted. Strong anticholinergic medications were defined as medications with a score of 2 or 3 on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale. Dementia or cognitive impairment was defined as a documented diagnosis or using a validated scale. Frailty was defined using the FRAIL-NH scale as 0–2 (non-frail), 3–6 (frail) and 7–14 (most-frail). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 17.4 % (n = 1010) residents used ≥1 strong anticholinergic medication, ranging from 1.3 % (n = 2) in China to 27.1 % (n = 147) in Italy. The most prevalent strong anticholinergics were quetiapine (n = 290, 5.0 % of all residents), olanzapine (132, 2.3 %), carbamazepine (102, 1.8 %), paroxetine (88, 1.5 %) and amitriptyline (87, 1.5 %). Prevalence was higher among residents with cognitive impairment (n = 602, 17.9 %) compared to those without (n = 408, 16.8 %), and among residents who were most frail (n = 553, 17.9 %) compared to those who were frail (n = 286, 16.5 %) or non-frail (n = 171, 17.5 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>One in six residents who were most frail and living with cognitive impairment used a strong anticholinergic. However, there was a 20-fold variation in prevalence across the 12 countries. Targeted deprescribing interventions may reduce potentially avoidable medication-harm.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003121/pdfft?md5=4af0421a68b14f894d007038945432d7&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324003121-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003121\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的需要平衡老年人使用强效抗胆碱能药物的益处和风险,尤其是在体弱和认知障碍的老年人中。方法对澳大利亚、中国、捷克共和国、英国、芬兰、法国、德国、以色列、意大利、日本、荷兰和西班牙 106 家养老院的 5800 名住院者的数据进行了二次横断面分析。强抗胆碱能药物是指在抗胆碱能认知负担量表中得分达到 2 分或 3 分的药物。痴呆或认知障碍的定义是有文件证明的诊断或使用有效的量表。虚弱程度使用 FRAIL-NH 量表定义为 0-2(不虚弱)、3-6(虚弱)和 7-14(最虚弱)。结果总体而言,17.4%(n = 1010)的居民使用了≥1种强抗胆碱能药物,从中国的1.3%(n = 2)到意大利的27.1%(n = 147)不等。最常见的强抗胆碱能药物是喹硫平(290 人,占住院患者总数的 5.0%)、奥氮平(132 人,占 2.3%)、卡马西平(102 人,占 1.8%)、帕罗西汀(88 人,占 1.5%)和阿米替林(87 人,占 1.5%)。有认知障碍的住院患者(n = 602,17.9%)的患病率高于无认知障碍的住院患者(n = 408,16.8%),最虚弱的住院患者(n = 553,17.9%)的患病率高于体弱的住院患者(n = 286,16.5%)或非体弱的住院患者(n = 171,17.5%)。然而,12 个国家的使用率相差 20 倍。有针对性的处方干预措施可以减少可能避免的药物伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of strong anticholinergic use in residents with and without cognitive impairment and frailty: Analysis from 106 nursing homes in 12 Asia-Pacific and European countries

Purpose

There is a need to balance the benefits and risks associated with strong anticholinergic medications in older adults, particularly among those with frailty and cognitive impairment. This study explored the international prevalence of strong anticholinergic medication use in residents of nursing homes with and without cognitive impairment and frailty.

Methods

Secondary, cross-sectional analyses of data from 5,800 residents of 106 nursing homes in Australia, China, Czech Republic, England, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, and Spain were conducted. Strong anticholinergic medications were defined as medications with a score of 2 or 3 on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale. Dementia or cognitive impairment was defined as a documented diagnosis or using a validated scale. Frailty was defined using the FRAIL-NH scale as 0–2 (non-frail), 3–6 (frail) and 7–14 (most-frail). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Overall, 17.4 % (n = 1010) residents used ≥1 strong anticholinergic medication, ranging from 1.3 % (n = 2) in China to 27.1 % (n = 147) in Italy. The most prevalent strong anticholinergics were quetiapine (n = 290, 5.0 % of all residents), olanzapine (132, 2.3 %), carbamazepine (102, 1.8 %), paroxetine (88, 1.5 %) and amitriptyline (87, 1.5 %). Prevalence was higher among residents with cognitive impairment (n = 602, 17.9 %) compared to those without (n = 408, 16.8 %), and among residents who were most frail (n = 553, 17.9 %) compared to those who were frail (n = 286, 16.5 %) or non-frail (n = 171, 17.5 %).

Conclusions

One in six residents who were most frail and living with cognitive impairment used a strong anticholinergic. However, there was a 20-fold variation in prevalence across the 12 countries. Targeted deprescribing interventions may reduce potentially avoidable medication-harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published. Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信