非药物干预对老年人肠道微生物群和肠道渗透性的影响:系统综述

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hazwanie Iliana Hairul Hisham , Siong Meng Lim , Chin Fen Neoh , Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed , Suzana Shahar , Kalavathy Ramasamy
{"title":"非药物干预对老年人肠道微生物群和肠道渗透性的影响:系统综述","authors":"Hazwanie Iliana Hairul Hisham ,&nbsp;Siong Meng Lim ,&nbsp;Chin Fen Neoh ,&nbsp;Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed ,&nbsp;Suzana Shahar ,&nbsp;Kalavathy Ramasamy","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review appraised previous findings of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota and/ or intestinal permeability in older adults. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library. Relevant studies were shortlisted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated for risks of bias using the “Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2” and the “NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group”. The primary outcomes were the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota diversity and composition, and intestinal permeability in older adults. Out of 85,114 studies, 38 were shortlisted. Generally, the non-pharmacological interventions were beneficial against dysbiosis and the leaky gut in older adults. Considering specific interventions with two or more studies that reported consistent outcomes, a pattern was observed amongst the Mediterranean diet (MD), polyphenol-rich (PR) diet and supplements (i.e., probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics). As for the other interventions, the very few studies that have been conducted did not allow a strong conclusion to be made just yet. The MD (single and multidomain interventions) restored gut microbiota by increasing species richness (alpha diversity) and reduced intestinal permeability (zonulin) and inflammation (CRP). The PR diet only showed slight changes in the gut microbiota but improved the gut barrier by reducing zonulin, CRP and IL-6. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics increased the genus <em>Bifidobacterium</em> spp. which are considered beneficial bacteria. This review has uncovered insights into the relationship between gut microbiota and intestinal epithelial barriers of specific non-pharmacological interventions in older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003169/pdfft?md5=d4181f32067df8c126d9f99fbfff0a7b&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324003169-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota and intestinal permeability in older adults: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Hazwanie Iliana Hairul Hisham ,&nbsp;Siong Meng Lim ,&nbsp;Chin Fen Neoh ,&nbsp;Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed ,&nbsp;Suzana Shahar ,&nbsp;Kalavathy Ramasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This systematic review appraised previous findings of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota and/ or intestinal permeability in older adults. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library. Relevant studies were shortlisted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated for risks of bias using the “Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2” and the “NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group”. The primary outcomes were the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota diversity and composition, and intestinal permeability in older adults. Out of 85,114 studies, 38 were shortlisted. Generally, the non-pharmacological interventions were beneficial against dysbiosis and the leaky gut in older adults. Considering specific interventions with two or more studies that reported consistent outcomes, a pattern was observed amongst the Mediterranean diet (MD), polyphenol-rich (PR) diet and supplements (i.e., probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics). As for the other interventions, the very few studies that have been conducted did not allow a strong conclusion to be made just yet. The MD (single and multidomain interventions) restored gut microbiota by increasing species richness (alpha diversity) and reduced intestinal permeability (zonulin) and inflammation (CRP). The PR diet only showed slight changes in the gut microbiota but improved the gut barrier by reducing zonulin, CRP and IL-6. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics increased the genus <em>Bifidobacterium</em> spp. which are considered beneficial bacteria. This review has uncovered insights into the relationship between gut microbiota and intestinal epithelial barriers of specific non-pharmacological interventions in older adults.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003169/pdfft?md5=d4181f32067df8c126d9f99fbfff0a7b&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324003169-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统性综述评估了以往对老年人肠道微生物群和/或肠道渗透性进行非药物干预的研究结果。我们使用 PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了文献检索。根据纳入和排除标准筛选出相关研究,并使用 "Cochrane 协作的偏倚风险 2 "和 "NIH 无对照组前后(前-后)研究质量评估工具 "对偏倚风险进行评估。主要结果是非药物干预对老年人肠道微生物群多样性和组成以及肠道渗透性的影响。在 85 114 项研究中,有 38 项入围。一般来说,非药物干预对老年人肠道菌群失调和肠道渗漏有益。考虑到有两项或更多研究报告了一致结果的特定干预措施,在地中海饮食(MD)、富含多酚(PR)饮食和补充剂(即益生菌、益生元和合成益生菌)中观察到了一种模式。至于其他干预措施,由于开展的研究极少,目前还无法得出有力的结论。MD(单域和多域干预)通过增加物种丰富度(α多样性)恢复了肠道微生物群,并降低了肠道渗透性(zonulin)和炎症(CRP)。PR 饮食只显示出肠道微生物群的轻微变化,但通过降低 zonulin、CRP 和 IL-6 改善了肠道屏障。益生菌、益生元和合成益生菌增加了被认为是有益菌的双歧杆菌属。本综述揭示了老年人肠道微生物群与特定非药物干预措施的肠道上皮屏障之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota and intestinal permeability in older adults: A systematic review

This systematic review appraised previous findings of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota and/ or intestinal permeability in older adults. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library. Relevant studies were shortlisted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated for risks of bias using the “Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2” and the “NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group”. The primary outcomes were the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on gut microbiota diversity and composition, and intestinal permeability in older adults. Out of 85,114 studies, 38 were shortlisted. Generally, the non-pharmacological interventions were beneficial against dysbiosis and the leaky gut in older adults. Considering specific interventions with two or more studies that reported consistent outcomes, a pattern was observed amongst the Mediterranean diet (MD), polyphenol-rich (PR) diet and supplements (i.e., probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics). As for the other interventions, the very few studies that have been conducted did not allow a strong conclusion to be made just yet. The MD (single and multidomain interventions) restored gut microbiota by increasing species richness (alpha diversity) and reduced intestinal permeability (zonulin) and inflammation (CRP). The PR diet only showed slight changes in the gut microbiota but improved the gut barrier by reducing zonulin, CRP and IL-6. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics increased the genus Bifidobacterium spp. which are considered beneficial bacteria. This review has uncovered insights into the relationship between gut microbiota and intestinal epithelial barriers of specific non-pharmacological interventions in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published. Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信