{"title":"加强髋关节和膝关节置换术后的恢复：随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Wen Zhou , Shiying Chu , Yuan Zhou , Yongjing Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus traditional care in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were acquired via a comprehensive search of multiple databases. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 software to calculate effect sizes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This meta-analysis included 850 patients in the ERAS group and 845 patients in the control group (patients who received traditional care). The outcomes suggested no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale, 30-day readmission rate, and mortality rate between the two groups. However, the ERAS group was associated with a significant decrease in transfusion rate, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Moreover, the ERAS group had higher Hospital for Special Surgery scores and satisfaction rates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients who underwent THA and TKA would benefit more from ERAS than traditional care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 249-257"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized control trials\",\"authors\":\"Wen Zhou , Shiying Chu , Yuan Zhou , Yongjing Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus traditional care in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were acquired via a comprehensive search of multiple databases. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 software to calculate effect sizes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This meta-analysis included 850 patients in the ERAS group and 845 patients in the control group (patients who received traditional care). The outcomes suggested no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale, 30-day readmission rate, and mortality rate between the two groups. However, the ERAS group was associated with a significant decrease in transfusion rate, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Moreover, the ERAS group had higher Hospital for Special Surgery scores and satisfaction rates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients who underwent THA and TKA would benefit more from ERAS than traditional care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 249-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197457224002441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197457224002441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized control trials
Objectives
This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus traditional care in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods
All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were acquired via a comprehensive search of multiple databases. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 software to calculate effect sizes.
Results
This meta-analysis included 850 patients in the ERAS group and 845 patients in the control group (patients who received traditional care). The outcomes suggested no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale, 30-day readmission rate, and mortality rate between the two groups. However, the ERAS group was associated with a significant decrease in transfusion rate, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Moreover, the ERAS group had higher Hospital for Special Surgery scores and satisfaction rates.
Conclusions
Patients who underwent THA and TKA would benefit more from ERAS than traditional care.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
