中国祁连山北部火山成因块状硫化物矿床的分类:岩石地层学和地球动力学环境的证据

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
Huanchao Xu, Xiang Sun, Ke Xiao, Shengjiang Suo, Xianyi Huang, Song Liu, Mingjun Zheng
{"title":"中国祁连山北部火山成因块状硫化物矿床的分类:岩石地层学和地球动力学环境的证据","authors":"Huanchao Xu,&nbsp;Xiang Sun,&nbsp;Ke Xiao,&nbsp;Shengjiang Suo,&nbsp;Xianyi Huang,&nbsp;Song Liu,&nbsp;Mingjun Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits are widely distributed both geographically and temporally, occurring from ancient Archean cratons to modern submarine volcanic environments, with a notable surge during the Paleozoic era. The North Qilian orogenic belt in China is a prominent Paleozoic VMS metallogenic province, shaped by complex geological processes such as the opening of the Qilian Ocean, oceanic subduction, and arc-continent collision. Previous research has constrained the timing of VMS mineralization in the North Qilian to between 440 and 470 Ma, identifying two primary deposit types: Kuroko-type and Cyprus-type. However, ongoing debates persist regarding the classification and geodynamic framework of these VMS deposits. The recent surge in international research on VMS deposit classification and tectonic settings has prompted a reassessment of VMS mineralization within the North Qilian belt. This study revisits the geological and geochemical characteristics of VMS deposits in the region, identifying two distinct types: Mafic VMS deposits and Bimodal-Felsic VMS deposits. Furthermore, the metallogenic dynamics of the Shijuli, Jiugequan, and Baiyinchang deposits have been re-evaluated in the context of the structural evolution and contemporary interpretations in this area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19644,"journal":{"name":"Ore Geology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003615/pdfft?md5=8306dead3f496cc89dc405ae09e3d6f5&pid=1-s2.0-S0169136824003615-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in North Qilian, China: Evidenced from lithostratigraphy and geodynamic setting\",\"authors\":\"Huanchao Xu,&nbsp;Xiang Sun,&nbsp;Ke Xiao,&nbsp;Shengjiang Suo,&nbsp;Xianyi Huang,&nbsp;Song Liu,&nbsp;Mingjun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits are widely distributed both geographically and temporally, occurring from ancient Archean cratons to modern submarine volcanic environments, with a notable surge during the Paleozoic era. The North Qilian orogenic belt in China is a prominent Paleozoic VMS metallogenic province, shaped by complex geological processes such as the opening of the Qilian Ocean, oceanic subduction, and arc-continent collision. Previous research has constrained the timing of VMS mineralization in the North Qilian to between 440 and 470 Ma, identifying two primary deposit types: Kuroko-type and Cyprus-type. However, ongoing debates persist regarding the classification and geodynamic framework of these VMS deposits. The recent surge in international research on VMS deposit classification and tectonic settings has prompted a reassessment of VMS mineralization within the North Qilian belt. This study revisits the geological and geochemical characteristics of VMS deposits in the region, identifying two distinct types: Mafic VMS deposits and Bimodal-Felsic VMS deposits. Furthermore, the metallogenic dynamics of the Shijuli, Jiugequan, and Baiyinchang deposits have been re-evaluated in the context of the structural evolution and contemporary interpretations in this area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ore Geology Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003615/pdfft?md5=8306dead3f496cc89dc405ae09e3d6f5&pid=1-s2.0-S0169136824003615-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ore Geology Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003615\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore Geology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136824003615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火山成因块状硫化物(VMS)矿床在地理和时间上都分布广泛,从远古的阿基安岩陨石坑到现代的海底火山环境都有出现,在古生代更是显著激增。中国的北祁连造山带是古生代VMS金属成矿带的重要产区,由祁连洋开辟、大洋俯冲和弧-大陆碰撞等复杂地质过程形成。以往的研究将北祁连的 VMS 成矿时间限定在 440 至 470 Ma 之间,并确定了两种主要的矿床类型:黑子型和塞浦路斯型。然而,关于这些 VMS 矿床的分类和地球动力学框架的争论仍在继续。最近,国际上对 VMS 矿床分类和构造环境的研究热潮促使人们对北祁连带内的 VMS 矿化进行重新评估。本研究重新审视了该地区 VMS 矿床的地质和地球化学特征,确定了两种截然不同的类型:岩浆型 VMS 矿床和双峰-长石型 VMS 矿床。此外,结合该地区的构造演化和当代解释,对石柱里、九曲泉和白银场矿床的成矿动力学进行了重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Classification of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in North Qilian, China: Evidenced from lithostratigraphy and geodynamic setting

Classification of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in North Qilian, China: Evidenced from lithostratigraphy and geodynamic setting

Volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits are widely distributed both geographically and temporally, occurring from ancient Archean cratons to modern submarine volcanic environments, with a notable surge during the Paleozoic era. The North Qilian orogenic belt in China is a prominent Paleozoic VMS metallogenic province, shaped by complex geological processes such as the opening of the Qilian Ocean, oceanic subduction, and arc-continent collision. Previous research has constrained the timing of VMS mineralization in the North Qilian to between 440 and 470 Ma, identifying two primary deposit types: Kuroko-type and Cyprus-type. However, ongoing debates persist regarding the classification and geodynamic framework of these VMS deposits. The recent surge in international research on VMS deposit classification and tectonic settings has prompted a reassessment of VMS mineralization within the North Qilian belt. This study revisits the geological and geochemical characteristics of VMS deposits in the region, identifying two distinct types: Mafic VMS deposits and Bimodal-Felsic VMS deposits. Furthermore, the metallogenic dynamics of the Shijuli, Jiugequan, and Baiyinchang deposits have been re-evaluated in the context of the structural evolution and contemporary interpretations in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ore Geology Reviews
Ore Geology Reviews 地学-地质学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
27.30%
发文量
546
审稿时长
22.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Ore Geology Reviews aims to familiarize all earth scientists with recent advances in a number of interconnected disciplines related to the study of, and search for, ore deposits. The reviews range from brief to longer contributions, but the journal preferentially publishes manuscripts that fill the niche between the commonly shorter journal articles and the comprehensive book coverages, and thus has a special appeal to many authors and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信