对澳大利亚维多利亚州报告的接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的死亡率进行详细审查:2021-2023 年

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"对澳大利亚维多利亚州报告的接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的死亡率进行详细审查:2021-2023 年","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The scale of the COVID-19 vaccine program, and appropriate focus on older individuals, emphasised monitoring of mortality as an important part of COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance, noting many deaths temporally associated with vaccination may not be causally related. This cross-sectional study describes Victoria's vaccine safety service (SAEFVIC) process of reviewing mortality reports following COVID-19 vaccination, summarises report characteristics and identifies trends in mortality reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Mortality cases reported to SAEFVIC following COVID-19 vaccination from 22 February 2021 to 22 February 2023 were included. Report characteristics, demographics, and cause of death information were described. Proportions of mortality reports per 100,000 vaccine doses administered were calculated, overall and stratified by age (&lt;60 years, ≥60 years), sex, vaccine type and dose number. Rate ratios (RR) were used to compare proportions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Reporting proportions were higher in the first three months of the vaccine program (3.98 per 100,000 doses), compared to the following 21 months (0.71 per 100,000 doses), RR:5.61, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001. Of 159 mortality reports included, 135/159 (84.9 %) were in individuals ≥60 years. Most individuals (121/159, 90.3 %) had comorbidities relevant to cause(s) of death, and 143/159 (89.9 %) were categorised as having a ‘likely alternate’ cause of death based on treating clinician/forensic assessment. For 11/159 (6.9 %) reports vaccine contribution to death could not be determined. Five deaths (0.03 per 100,000 doses administered), all publicly reported, were assessed by the national regulator as likely vaccine-associated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mortality reporting predominantly reflected the health status of the population receiving vaccines, vaccine administration patterns and contextual factors surrounding COVID-19 vaccines (including public concerns regarding serious adverse events of special interest), as well as extremely rare but fatal adverse events that were likely vaccine-associated. Jurisdictional vaccine safety services such as SAEFVIC play an important role in follow-up of mortality reports, supporting the work of national regulators, and thereby supporting vaccine safety surveillance and vaccine confidence more broadly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detailed review of mortality reported following COVID-19 vaccination in Victoria, Australia: 2021-2023\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The scale of the COVID-19 vaccine program, and appropriate focus on older individuals, emphasised monitoring of mortality as an important part of COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance, noting many deaths temporally associated with vaccination may not be causally related. This cross-sectional study describes Victoria's vaccine safety service (SAEFVIC) process of reviewing mortality reports following COVID-19 vaccination, summarises report characteristics and identifies trends in mortality reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Mortality cases reported to SAEFVIC following COVID-19 vaccination from 22 February 2021 to 22 February 2023 were included. Report characteristics, demographics, and cause of death information were described. Proportions of mortality reports per 100,000 vaccine doses administered were calculated, overall and stratified by age (&lt;60 years, ≥60 years), sex, vaccine type and dose number. Rate ratios (RR) were used to compare proportions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Reporting proportions were higher in the first three months of the vaccine program (3.98 per 100,000 doses), compared to the following 21 months (0.71 per 100,000 doses), RR:5.61, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001. Of 159 mortality reports included, 135/159 (84.9 %) were in individuals ≥60 years. Most individuals (121/159, 90.3 %) had comorbidities relevant to cause(s) of death, and 143/159 (89.9 %) were categorised as having a ‘likely alternate’ cause of death based on treating clinician/forensic assessment. For 11/159 (6.9 %) reports vaccine contribution to death could not be determined. Five deaths (0.03 per 100,000 doses administered), all publicly reported, were assessed by the national regulator as likely vaccine-associated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mortality reporting predominantly reflected the health status of the population receiving vaccines, vaccine administration patterns and contextual factors surrounding COVID-19 vaccines (including public concerns regarding serious adverse events of special interest), as well as extremely rare but fatal adverse events that were likely vaccine-associated. Jurisdictional vaccine safety services such as SAEFVIC play an important role in follow-up of mortality reports, supporting the work of national regulators, and thereby supporting vaccine safety surveillance and vaccine confidence more broadly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010508\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 COVID-19 疫苗计划的规模以及对老年人的适当关注强调了死亡率监测是 COVID-19 疫苗安全性监测的重要组成部分,并指出许多与接种疫苗在时间上相关的死亡可能并无因果关系。本横断面研究描述了维多利亚州疫苗安全服务机构(SAEFVIC)对COVID-19疫苗接种后的死亡率报告进行审核的过程,总结了报告特征并确定了死亡率报告的趋势。对报告特征、人口统计学和死因信息进行了描述。计算了每 10 万剂疫苗接种的死亡报告比例,包括总体比例和按年龄(60 岁,≥60 岁)、性别、疫苗类型和剂次进行的分层比例。结果疫苗接种计划的前三个月(每 10 万剂 3.98 例)与随后 21 个月(每 10 万剂 0.71 例)相比,报告比例更高,RR:5.61, p <0.001。在纳入的 159 份死亡报告中,135/159 份(84.9%)的死亡者年龄≥60 岁。大多数患者(121/159,90.3%)的合并症与死因有关,143/159(89.9%)的患者根据临床医生/法医的评估被归类为 "可能的替代 "死因。有 11/159 份报告(6.9%)无法确定疫苗是否导致死亡。结论 死亡报告主要反映了接种疫苗人群的健康状况、疫苗接种模式和围绕 COVID-19 疫苗的背景因素(包括公众对特别关注的严重不良事件的担忧),以及极罕见但可能与疫苗相关的致命不良事件。SAEFVIC 等辖区疫苗安全服务机构在跟踪死亡率报告、支持国家监管机构的工作方面发挥着重要作用,从而更广泛地支持疫苗安全监控和疫苗信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detailed review of mortality reported following COVID-19 vaccination in Victoria, Australia: 2021-2023

Introduction

The scale of the COVID-19 vaccine program, and appropriate focus on older individuals, emphasised monitoring of mortality as an important part of COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance, noting many deaths temporally associated with vaccination may not be causally related. This cross-sectional study describes Victoria's vaccine safety service (SAEFVIC) process of reviewing mortality reports following COVID-19 vaccination, summarises report characteristics and identifies trends in mortality reporting.

Methods

Mortality cases reported to SAEFVIC following COVID-19 vaccination from 22 February 2021 to 22 February 2023 were included. Report characteristics, demographics, and cause of death information were described. Proportions of mortality reports per 100,000 vaccine doses administered were calculated, overall and stratified by age (<60 years, ≥60 years), sex, vaccine type and dose number. Rate ratios (RR) were used to compare proportions.

Results

Reporting proportions were higher in the first three months of the vaccine program (3.98 per 100,000 doses), compared to the following 21 months (0.71 per 100,000 doses), RR:5.61, p < 0.001. Of 159 mortality reports included, 135/159 (84.9 %) were in individuals ≥60 years. Most individuals (121/159, 90.3 %) had comorbidities relevant to cause(s) of death, and 143/159 (89.9 %) were categorised as having a ‘likely alternate’ cause of death based on treating clinician/forensic assessment. For 11/159 (6.9 %) reports vaccine contribution to death could not be determined. Five deaths (0.03 per 100,000 doses administered), all publicly reported, were assessed by the national regulator as likely vaccine-associated.

Conclusions

Mortality reporting predominantly reflected the health status of the population receiving vaccines, vaccine administration patterns and contextual factors surrounding COVID-19 vaccines (including public concerns regarding serious adverse events of special interest), as well as extremely rare but fatal adverse events that were likely vaccine-associated. Jurisdictional vaccine safety services such as SAEFVIC play an important role in follow-up of mortality reports, supporting the work of national regulators, and thereby supporting vaccine safety surveillance and vaccine confidence more broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信