夹层钢筋玻璃梁的抗压和抗剪性能实验研究

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"夹层钢筋玻璃梁的抗压和抗剪性能实验研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents an experimental investigation into the compressive and shear resistance of triple-layered laminated steel-reinforced glass beams. Two types of tests are performed: (a) local compressive tests (force over a support) and (b) bending tests (force close to a support). In total, six local compressive tests and eight bending tests are performed. Overall, beams with a shear span-to-effective depth ratio (<em>a</em>/<em>d</em>) approximately equal to 0, 0.63, and 1.0 are tested. Two different types of flexural reinforcement are used separately: solid (S) and hollow (H) reinforcement. The behaviour of the outer glass panes, and top and bottom reinforcement is monitored using strain gauges and Digital Image Correlation (DIC). The test results are elaborated in terms of load-displacement curves, the evolution of strains and crack patterns. Three failure modes are observed: yielding of the reinforcement (PF), crushing of glass (CF), and rupture of the reinforcement (RR). Shear failure occurred due to the crushing of glass in the compressed diagonal strut in the shear span. It was found that the shear resistance increases with a smaller shear span-to-effective depth ratio and stronger reinforcement. The dominant shear transfer mechanism was the direct strut action. It was found that the post-fracture capacity had a relatively constant value for all the tests with a slight increase for smaller <em>a</em>/<em>d</em>. The actual tensile strains in the bottom reinforcement measured by DIC are compared with the calculated strains based on the curvature of uncracked and cracked cross-sections, assuming plane section behaviour. It was observed that the actual strains are systematically larger than the calculated ones because, in reality, the section does not remain plane. After the appearance of the first crack, the beams essentially behave like strut-and-tie systems, where the strut is the diagonally compressed laminated glass and the tie is the bottom reinforcement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental investigation of the compressive and shear resistance of laminated steel-reinforced glass beams\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents an experimental investigation into the compressive and shear resistance of triple-layered laminated steel-reinforced glass beams. Two types of tests are performed: (a) local compressive tests (force over a support) and (b) bending tests (force close to a support). In total, six local compressive tests and eight bending tests are performed. Overall, beams with a shear span-to-effective depth ratio (<em>a</em>/<em>d</em>) approximately equal to 0, 0.63, and 1.0 are tested. Two different types of flexural reinforcement are used separately: solid (S) and hollow (H) reinforcement. The behaviour of the outer glass panes, and top and bottom reinforcement is monitored using strain gauges and Digital Image Correlation (DIC). The test results are elaborated in terms of load-displacement curves, the evolution of strains and crack patterns. Three failure modes are observed: yielding of the reinforcement (PF), crushing of glass (CF), and rupture of the reinforcement (RR). Shear failure occurred due to the crushing of glass in the compressed diagonal strut in the shear span. It was found that the shear resistance increases with a smaller shear span-to-effective depth ratio and stronger reinforcement. The dominant shear transfer mechanism was the direct strut action. It was found that the post-fracture capacity had a relatively constant value for all the tests with a slight increase for smaller <em>a</em>/<em>d</em>. The actual tensile strains in the bottom reinforcement measured by DIC are compared with the calculated strains based on the curvature of uncracked and cracked cross-sections, assuming plane section behaviour. It was observed that the actual strains are systematically larger than the calculated ones because, in reality, the section does not remain plane. After the appearance of the first crack, the beams essentially behave like strut-and-tie systems, where the strut is the diagonally compressed laminated glass and the tie is the bottom reinforcement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824035232\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824035232","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对三层夹层钢筋玻璃梁的抗压和抗剪性能进行了实验研究。试验分为两类:(a) 局部抗压试验(在支座上受力)和 (b) 弯曲试验(靠近支座受力)。总共进行了六次局部抗压试验和八次弯曲试验。总体而言,测试了剪切跨度与有效深度比 (a/d) 约等于 0、0.63 和 1.0 的梁。分别使用了两种不同类型的抗弯钢筋:实心钢筋(S)和空心钢筋(H)。使用应变仪和数字图像相关技术(DIC)对外层玻璃板、顶部和底部钢筋的行为进行监测。测试结果通过载荷-位移曲线、应变演变和裂纹模式进行阐述。观察到三种破坏模式:钢筋屈服(PF)、玻璃破碎(CF)和钢筋断裂(RR)。剪切破坏是由于剪切跨度中压缩斜支撑的玻璃破碎造成的。研究发现,剪切跨度与有效深度比越小,钢筋强度越高,抗剪能力就越强。主要的剪力传递机制是直接的支柱作用。试验发现,在所有试验中,断裂后承载力的值相对恒定,但当 a/d 值较小时,承载力会略有增加。通过 DIC 测得的底部钢筋实际拉伸应变与根据未开裂和开裂横截面的曲率计算得出的应变(假定为平面截面行为)进行了比较。结果表明,实际应变系统地大于计算应变,因为在实际情况中,截面并不保持平面。在出现第一条裂缝后,横梁基本上表现为支柱-拉杆系统,其中支柱是斜压夹层玻璃,拉杆是底部钢筋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental investigation of the compressive and shear resistance of laminated steel-reinforced glass beams

This paper presents an experimental investigation into the compressive and shear resistance of triple-layered laminated steel-reinforced glass beams. Two types of tests are performed: (a) local compressive tests (force over a support) and (b) bending tests (force close to a support). In total, six local compressive tests and eight bending tests are performed. Overall, beams with a shear span-to-effective depth ratio (a/d) approximately equal to 0, 0.63, and 1.0 are tested. Two different types of flexural reinforcement are used separately: solid (S) and hollow (H) reinforcement. The behaviour of the outer glass panes, and top and bottom reinforcement is monitored using strain gauges and Digital Image Correlation (DIC). The test results are elaborated in terms of load-displacement curves, the evolution of strains and crack patterns. Three failure modes are observed: yielding of the reinforcement (PF), crushing of glass (CF), and rupture of the reinforcement (RR). Shear failure occurred due to the crushing of glass in the compressed diagonal strut in the shear span. It was found that the shear resistance increases with a smaller shear span-to-effective depth ratio and stronger reinforcement. The dominant shear transfer mechanism was the direct strut action. It was found that the post-fracture capacity had a relatively constant value for all the tests with a slight increase for smaller a/d. The actual tensile strains in the bottom reinforcement measured by DIC are compared with the calculated strains based on the curvature of uncracked and cracked cross-sections, assuming plane section behaviour. It was observed that the actual strains are systematically larger than the calculated ones because, in reality, the section does not remain plane. After the appearance of the first crack, the beams essentially behave like strut-and-tie systems, where the strut is the diagonally compressed laminated glass and the tie is the bottom reinforcement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信