经导管肺动脉瓣植入术:先天性心脏病患者使用自扩张瓣膜的初步经验以及与球囊扩张瓣膜的比较

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Q. Rouau
{"title":"经导管肺动脉瓣植入术:先天性心脏病患者使用自扩张瓣膜的初步经验以及与球囊扩张瓣膜的比较","authors":"Q. Rouau","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.07.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><p>Self-expandable valves have emerged as an alternative option for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) compared to balloon-expandable valves. However, their efficacy in patients with congenital heart diseases remains relatively unexplored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent TPVR with self-expandable valves versus balloon-expandable valves.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective single-center analysis was conducted, encompassing all consecutive patients (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->89) who underwent TPVR using either balloon-expandable valves (Sapien 3 valves, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->63, 70%) or self-expandable valves (Venus-P, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26, 30%) between January 2022 and February 2024. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and short-term outcomes were compared. Electrophysiological studies were performed in all patients with tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) prior to the procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age of patients was 34<!--> <!-->years for Sapien 3 (11 children, youngest: 8<!--> <!-->years) and 46<!--> <!-->years for Venus-P (one child aged 15<!--> <!-->years), <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014. Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) was the primary diagnosis in 49 cases (55%, 32 with Sapien 3 and 17 with Venus-P valve, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.041). Native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts were identified in 100% and 54% of patients with Venus-P and Sapien 3 valves, respectively, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001.</p><p>Valve implantation was successful in all patients. Major adverse events occurred in 4.5% of cases (3.8% in Sapien 3 vs. 4.7% in Venus P-valve group, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.66). Ventricular ectopy necessitating medical therapy was more frequent in the Venus-P group (19% vs. 0%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002) including one case of sustained asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia, managed with amiodarone therapy. No peri-procedural deaths were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Self-expandable valves demonstrate efficacy for TPVR in patients with large native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts, accompanied by a low rate of major adverse events. However, an increased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias was noted compared to balloon-expandable valves, indicating the importance of long-term follow-up data to better understand outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation: Initial experience with self-expandable valve in patients with congenital heart diseases and comparison with balloon-expandable valve\",\"authors\":\"Q. Rouau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.07.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><p>Self-expandable valves have emerged as an alternative option for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) compared to balloon-expandable valves. However, their efficacy in patients with congenital heart diseases remains relatively unexplored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent TPVR with self-expandable valves versus balloon-expandable valves.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective single-center analysis was conducted, encompassing all consecutive patients (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->89) who underwent TPVR using either balloon-expandable valves (Sapien 3 valves, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->63, 70%) or self-expandable valves (Venus-P, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26, 30%) between January 2022 and February 2024. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and short-term outcomes were compared. Electrophysiological studies were performed in all patients with tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) prior to the procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age of patients was 34<!--> <!-->years for Sapien 3 (11 children, youngest: 8<!--> <!-->years) and 46<!--> <!-->years for Venus-P (one child aged 15<!--> <!-->years), <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014. Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) was the primary diagnosis in 49 cases (55%, 32 with Sapien 3 and 17 with Venus-P valve, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.041). Native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts were identified in 100% and 54% of patients with Venus-P and Sapien 3 valves, respectively, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001.</p><p>Valve implantation was successful in all patients. Major adverse events occurred in 4.5% of cases (3.8% in Sapien 3 vs. 4.7% in Venus P-valve group, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.66). Ventricular ectopy necessitating medical therapy was more frequent in the Venus-P group (19% vs. 0%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002) including one case of sustained asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia, managed with amiodarone therapy. No peri-procedural deaths were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Self-expandable valves demonstrate efficacy for TPVR in patients with large native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts, accompanied by a low rate of major adverse events. However, an increased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias was noted compared to balloon-expandable valves, indicating the importance of long-term follow-up data to better understand outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624002481\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213624002481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言/背景与球囊扩张瓣膜相比,自体扩张瓣膜已成为经导管肺动脉瓣置换术(TPVR)的替代选择。本研究旨在比较使用自扩张瓣膜和球囊扩张瓣膜进行经导管肺动脉瓣置换术(TPVR)患者的特征和预后。方法对 2022 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月期间使用球囊扩张瓣膜(Sapien 3 瓣膜,n = 63,70%)或自体扩张瓣膜(Venus-P,n = 26,30%)进行 TPVR 的所有连续患者(n = 89)进行了前瞻性单中心分析。对患者特征、手术数据和短期疗效进行了比较。所有法洛四联症(ToF)患者在手术前均进行了电生理研究。结果Sapien 3的患者中位年龄为34岁(11名儿童,最小的8岁),Venus-P的患者中位年龄为46岁(1名儿童15岁),P = 0.014。法洛四联症(ToF)是 49 例(55%,32 例为 Sapien 3,17 例为 Venus-P 瓣膜,P = 0.041)患者的主要诊断。Venus-P瓣膜和Sapien 3瓣膜患者中分别有100%和54%的患者发现了原生或修补的右心室流出道,P < 0.001。4.5%的病例发生了重大不良事件(Sapien 3瓣膜组为3.8%,Venus P瓣膜组为4.7%,P = 0.66)。需要药物治疗的室性异位在 Venus-P 组更为常见(19% 对 0%,P = 0.002),其中包括一例持续性无症状室性心动过速,经胺碘酮治疗后得到控制。结论自体可扩张瓣膜对右心室流出道较大或有修补的患者进行 TPVR 有一定疗效,主要不良反应发生率较低。然而,与球囊扩张瓣膜相比,室性心律失常的发生率有所增加,这表明长期随访数据对于更好地了解疗效非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation: Initial experience with self-expandable valve in patients with congenital heart diseases and comparison with balloon-expandable valve

Introduction/Background

Self-expandable valves have emerged as an alternative option for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) compared to balloon-expandable valves. However, their efficacy in patients with congenital heart diseases remains relatively unexplored.

Objective

This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent TPVR with self-expandable valves versus balloon-expandable valves.

Methods

A prospective single-center analysis was conducted, encompassing all consecutive patients (n = 89) who underwent TPVR using either balloon-expandable valves (Sapien 3 valves, n = 63, 70%) or self-expandable valves (Venus-P, n = 26, 30%) between January 2022 and February 2024. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and short-term outcomes were compared. Electrophysiological studies were performed in all patients with tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) prior to the procedure.

Results

The median age of patients was 34 years for Sapien 3 (11 children, youngest: 8 years) and 46 years for Venus-P (one child aged 15 years), P = 0.014. Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) was the primary diagnosis in 49 cases (55%, 32 with Sapien 3 and 17 with Venus-P valve, P = 0.041). Native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts were identified in 100% and 54% of patients with Venus-P and Sapien 3 valves, respectively, P < 0.001.

Valve implantation was successful in all patients. Major adverse events occurred in 4.5% of cases (3.8% in Sapien 3 vs. 4.7% in Venus P-valve group, P = 0.66). Ventricular ectopy necessitating medical therapy was more frequent in the Venus-P group (19% vs. 0%, P = 0.002) including one case of sustained asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia, managed with amiodarone therapy. No peri-procedural deaths were reported.

Conclusion

Self-expandable valves demonstrate efficacy for TPVR in patients with large native or patched right ventricular outflow tracts, accompanied by a low rate of major adverse events. However, an increased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias was noted compared to balloon-expandable valves, indicating the importance of long-term follow-up data to better understand outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信