用微波驱动的等离子处理空气灭活干燥食品基质上的沙门氏菌、屎肠球菌和天然微生物群

IF 6.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Esther García Casado , Yijiao Yao , Biagio Zaffora , Domiziana Battaggia , Uta Schnabel , Sophie Zuber , Heidy M.W. den Besten
{"title":"用微波驱动的等离子处理空气灭活干燥食品基质上的沙门氏菌、屎肠球菌和天然微生物群","authors":"Esther García Casado ,&nbsp;Yijiao Yao ,&nbsp;Biagio Zaffora ,&nbsp;Domiziana Battaggia ,&nbsp;Uta Schnabel ,&nbsp;Sophie Zuber ,&nbsp;Heidy M.W. den Besten","doi":"10.1016/j.ifset.2024.103822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the efficacy of plasma-processed air (PPA) as a non-thermal treatment for decontamination of dry food surfaces, such as wheat grains, black peppercorns, and onion flakes. We compared the effect of various inoculum types of <em>Enterococcus faecium</em>, revealing a higher resistance of the powder form compared with liquid and slurry inocula on black peppercorns. Furthermore, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em> NRRL B-2354 appeared to be a suitable control indicator for <em>Salmonella</em>. The PPA efficacy varied across matrices, being higher on medium agar (7.0 ± 0.5 log<sub>10</sub>), followed by wheat grains (2.1 ± 0.2 log<sub>10</sub>), black peppercorns (1.5 ± 0.1 log<sub>10</sub>), and no reduction on onion flakes. Variation was also found across microorganisms, as the natural microbiota was reduced on wheat grains (1.6 ± 0.6 log<sub>10</sub> for mesophilic count and 0.8 ± 0.3 log<sub>10</sub> for spores), while on black peppercorns this was only achieved after upscaling (1.3 ± 0.2 log<sub>10</sub> for mesophilic and 1.5 ± 0.1 log<sub>10</sub> for spores). The findings of this study give guidance to further optimize the application of PPA treatment by changing the technical parameter settings of the plasma setup to increase the microbial efficacy and/or combining the PPA treatment with other methods to enhance microbial control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":329,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 103822"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856424002613/pdfft?md5=d16c1aa3205e25ab09dd55b3e5df2f67&pid=1-s2.0-S1466856424002613-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inactivation of Salmonella, Enterococcus faecium and natural microbiota on dry food matrices with microwave-driven plasma-processed air\",\"authors\":\"Esther García Casado ,&nbsp;Yijiao Yao ,&nbsp;Biagio Zaffora ,&nbsp;Domiziana Battaggia ,&nbsp;Uta Schnabel ,&nbsp;Sophie Zuber ,&nbsp;Heidy M.W. den Besten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ifset.2024.103822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores the efficacy of plasma-processed air (PPA) as a non-thermal treatment for decontamination of dry food surfaces, such as wheat grains, black peppercorns, and onion flakes. We compared the effect of various inoculum types of <em>Enterococcus faecium</em>, revealing a higher resistance of the powder form compared with liquid and slurry inocula on black peppercorns. Furthermore, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em> NRRL B-2354 appeared to be a suitable control indicator for <em>Salmonella</em>. The PPA efficacy varied across matrices, being higher on medium agar (7.0 ± 0.5 log<sub>10</sub>), followed by wheat grains (2.1 ± 0.2 log<sub>10</sub>), black peppercorns (1.5 ± 0.1 log<sub>10</sub>), and no reduction on onion flakes. Variation was also found across microorganisms, as the natural microbiota was reduced on wheat grains (1.6 ± 0.6 log<sub>10</sub> for mesophilic count and 0.8 ± 0.3 log<sub>10</sub> for spores), while on black peppercorns this was only achieved after upscaling (1.3 ± 0.2 log<sub>10</sub> for mesophilic and 1.5 ± 0.1 log<sub>10</sub> for spores). The findings of this study give guidance to further optimize the application of PPA treatment by changing the technical parameter settings of the plasma setup to increase the microbial efficacy and/or combining the PPA treatment with other methods to enhance microbial control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856424002613/pdfft?md5=d16c1aa3205e25ab09dd55b3e5df2f67&pid=1-s2.0-S1466856424002613-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856424002613\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466856424002613","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了等离子处理空气 (PPA) 作为一种非热处理方法对小麦颗粒、黑胡椒和洋葱片等干燥食品表面的去污效果。我们比较了各种类型的粪肠球菌接种体的效果,结果表明,与液体和浆液接种体相比,粉末状的粪肠球菌对黑胡椒的抗性更高。此外,粪肠球菌 NRRL B-2354 似乎是沙门氏菌的合适对照指标。不同基质的 PPA 效力不同,在培养基琼脂上的 PPA 效力较高(7.0 ± 0.5 log10),其次是麦粒(2.1 ± 0.2 log10)和黑胡椒(1.5 ± 0.1 log10),洋葱片上的 PPA 效力没有降低。不同微生物之间也存在差异,小麦颗粒上的天然微生物群减少了(中嗜酸性计数减少了 1.6 ± 0.6 log10,孢子减少了 0.8 ± 0.3 log10),而黑胡椒只有在升级后才会减少(中嗜酸性计数减少了 1.3 ± 0.2 log10,孢子减少了 1.5 ± 0.1 log10)。本研究的结果为进一步优化 PPA 处理的应用提供了指导,方法是改变等离子体装置的技术参数设置,以提高微生物功效和/或将 PPA 处理与其他方法相结合,从而加强微生物控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inactivation of Salmonella, Enterococcus faecium and natural microbiota on dry food matrices with microwave-driven plasma-processed air

This study explores the efficacy of plasma-processed air (PPA) as a non-thermal treatment for decontamination of dry food surfaces, such as wheat grains, black peppercorns, and onion flakes. We compared the effect of various inoculum types of Enterococcus faecium, revealing a higher resistance of the powder form compared with liquid and slurry inocula on black peppercorns. Furthermore, Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 appeared to be a suitable control indicator for Salmonella. The PPA efficacy varied across matrices, being higher on medium agar (7.0 ± 0.5 log10), followed by wheat grains (2.1 ± 0.2 log10), black peppercorns (1.5 ± 0.1 log10), and no reduction on onion flakes. Variation was also found across microorganisms, as the natural microbiota was reduced on wheat grains (1.6 ± 0.6 log10 for mesophilic count and 0.8 ± 0.3 log10 for spores), while on black peppercorns this was only achieved after upscaling (1.3 ± 0.2 log10 for mesophilic and 1.5 ± 0.1 log10 for spores). The findings of this study give guidance to further optimize the application of PPA treatment by changing the technical parameter settings of the plasma setup to increase the microbial efficacy and/or combining the PPA treatment with other methods to enhance microbial control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
259
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies (IFSET) aims to provide the highest quality original contributions and few, mainly upon invitation, reviews on and highly innovative developments in food science and emerging food process technologies. The significance of the results either for the science community or for industrial R&D groups must be specified. Papers submitted must be of highest scientific quality and only those advancing current scientific knowledge and understanding or with technical relevance will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信