检测人血清中 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体的四种试剂盒的性能评估

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hui Zhen , Ya Cheng , Qimeng Sun, Ying Zheng, Lili Tian, Chao Shen, Li Li, Jie Gong, Yonggang Chen, Hongping Ba
{"title":"检测人血清中 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体的四种试剂盒的性能评估","authors":"Hui Zhen ,&nbsp;Ya Cheng ,&nbsp;Qimeng Sun,&nbsp;Ying Zheng,&nbsp;Lili Tian,&nbsp;Chao Shen,&nbsp;Li Li,&nbsp;Jie Gong,&nbsp;Yonggang Chen,&nbsp;Hongping Ba","doi":"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To evaluate four novel SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assay kits' application in neutralizing antibodies of population. Questionnaires from the voluntary participating researchers and selected the qualified questionnaires to analyse. For negative and positive coincidence rate, four novel SARS-Cov-2 neutralization antibody assay kits were tested. For within-run and between-run Precision verification study, four serum samples with two high and two low titer neutralizing antibodies were used to analyse. Based on the questionnaires, 175 qualified samples were divided into two groups. (1) negative neutralizing antibodies group: 31 samples had not been infected with the novel SARS-Cov-2 nor received the vaccine within the past one year; (2) positive neutralizing antibodies group: 144 samples were infected by COVID-19. There was 28 negative and 3 positive neutralizing antibodies of the individuals among the 31 negative samples which based on the questionnaires. The negative rates of 28 negative individules tested by GenScript, Vazyme and Hygeianey were 82.14 %, 60.71 % and 17.85 %, while the positive rates of the 147 positive samples were 93.87 %, 95.23 % and 100 %. The within-run coefficient of variations (C·V) of PBNAs, GenScript, Vazyme and Hygeianey were 11.49 %, 9.12 %, 7.97 % and 7.48 %, while the between-run coefficient of variations (C·V) were 21.37 %, 14.21 %, 12.29 % and 11.78 %. Due to the large within-run and between-run coefficient of variations, PBNAs was not suitable for large-scale promotion, while ELISAs could be leveraged for routine monitoring the titer of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical virology plus","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000176/pdfft?md5=3e552214716ffe9cd0199a6acb5dc419&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000176-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of four kits for the detection of neutralizing antibody against SARS-CoV-2 in human serum\",\"authors\":\"Hui Zhen ,&nbsp;Ya Cheng ,&nbsp;Qimeng Sun,&nbsp;Ying Zheng,&nbsp;Lili Tian,&nbsp;Chao Shen,&nbsp;Li Li,&nbsp;Jie Gong,&nbsp;Yonggang Chen,&nbsp;Hongping Ba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcvp.2024.100192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To evaluate four novel SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assay kits' application in neutralizing antibodies of population. Questionnaires from the voluntary participating researchers and selected the qualified questionnaires to analyse. For negative and positive coincidence rate, four novel SARS-Cov-2 neutralization antibody assay kits were tested. For within-run and between-run Precision verification study, four serum samples with two high and two low titer neutralizing antibodies were used to analyse. Based on the questionnaires, 175 qualified samples were divided into two groups. (1) negative neutralizing antibodies group: 31 samples had not been infected with the novel SARS-Cov-2 nor received the vaccine within the past one year; (2) positive neutralizing antibodies group: 144 samples were infected by COVID-19. There was 28 negative and 3 positive neutralizing antibodies of the individuals among the 31 negative samples which based on the questionnaires. The negative rates of 28 negative individules tested by GenScript, Vazyme and Hygeianey were 82.14 %, 60.71 % and 17.85 %, while the positive rates of the 147 positive samples were 93.87 %, 95.23 % and 100 %. The within-run coefficient of variations (C·V) of PBNAs, GenScript, Vazyme and Hygeianey were 11.49 %, 9.12 %, 7.97 % and 7.48 %, while the between-run coefficient of variations (C·V) were 21.37 %, 14.21 %, 12.29 % and 11.78 %. Due to the large within-run and between-run coefficient of variations, PBNAs was not suitable for large-scale promotion, while ELISAs could be leveraged for routine monitoring the titer of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000176/pdfft?md5=3e552214716ffe9cd0199a6acb5dc419&pid=1-s2.0-S2667038024000176-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical virology plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical virology plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038024000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估四种新型 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体检测试剂盒在人群中和抗体中的应用。向自愿参与的研究人员发放问卷,并选择合格的问卷进行分析。对四种新型 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体检测试剂盒进行阴性和阳性重合率测试。在运行内和运行间的精密度验证研究中,使用了四份血清样本,分别含有两个高滴度和两个低滴度的中和抗体。根据调查问卷,175 份合格样本被分为两组。(1)中和抗体阴性组:31 个样本在过去一年内没有感染过新型 SARS-Cov-2,也没有接种过疫苗;(2)中和抗体阳性组:144 个样本感染了 COVID-19。在 31 个阴性样本中,有 28 人的中和抗体为阴性,3 人的中和抗体为阳性。由 GenScript、Vazyme 和 Hygeianey 检测的 28 个阴性个体的阴性率分别为 82.14 %、60.71 % 和 17.85 %,而 147 个阳性样本的阳性率分别为 93.87 %、95.23 % 和 100 %。PBNAs、GenScript、Vazyme 和 Hygeianey 的检出限内变异系数(C-V)分别为 11.49 %、9.12 %、7.97 % 和 7.48 %,而检出限间变异系数(C-V)分别为 21.37 %、14.21 %、12.29 % 和 11.78 %。由于运行内和运行间变异系数较大,PBNAs 不适合大规模推广,而 ELISAs 可用于常规监测 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体滴度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of four kits for the detection of neutralizing antibody against SARS-CoV-2 in human serum

To evaluate four novel SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assay kits' application in neutralizing antibodies of population. Questionnaires from the voluntary participating researchers and selected the qualified questionnaires to analyse. For negative and positive coincidence rate, four novel SARS-Cov-2 neutralization antibody assay kits were tested. For within-run and between-run Precision verification study, four serum samples with two high and two low titer neutralizing antibodies were used to analyse. Based on the questionnaires, 175 qualified samples were divided into two groups. (1) negative neutralizing antibodies group: 31 samples had not been infected with the novel SARS-Cov-2 nor received the vaccine within the past one year; (2) positive neutralizing antibodies group: 144 samples were infected by COVID-19. There was 28 negative and 3 positive neutralizing antibodies of the individuals among the 31 negative samples which based on the questionnaires. The negative rates of 28 negative individules tested by GenScript, Vazyme and Hygeianey were 82.14 %, 60.71 % and 17.85 %, while the positive rates of the 147 positive samples were 93.87 %, 95.23 % and 100 %. The within-run coefficient of variations (C·V) of PBNAs, GenScript, Vazyme and Hygeianey were 11.49 %, 9.12 %, 7.97 % and 7.48 %, while the between-run coefficient of variations (C·V) were 21.37 %, 14.21 %, 12.29 % and 11.78 %. Due to the large within-run and between-run coefficient of variations, PBNAs was not suitable for large-scale promotion, while ELISAs could be leveraged for routine monitoring the titer of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical virology plus
Journal of clinical virology plus Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信