{"title":"中国不同类型资源型城市的环境风险是否存在异质性?基于环境风险领域方法的评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the rapid social and economic development, urban environmental risks are surging, necessitating urgent attention to prevention, control, and management. Resource-based cities, reliant on natural resources for economic growth, grapple with environmental hazards stemming from mineral resource extraction, processing, and production. The proliferation of “high energy consumption and high emission” projects exacerbates these risks through indiscriminate development. Environmental risk profiles vary significantly across resource-based cities at different developmental stages and with diverse resource portfolios. Employing the environmental risk field theory, this study assesses environmental risks in growing (Ordos), mature (Ganzhou), declining (Baishan), and regenerating (Baotou) resource-based cities, from 2015 to 2021 at a 10 km × 10 km resolution. The research findings reveal significant heterogeneity in environmental risks among various types of resource-based cities. While environmental risks generally exhibit an upward trend across all four city types, the increase is notably more pronounced in growing and mature resource-based cities. Growing and regenerating resource-based cities exhibit relatively lower levels of environmental risk, with distinct spatial agglomeration, whereas mature and declining resource-based cities face higher overall environmental risks, demonstrating greater receptor vulnerability and environmental risk field intensity, respectively. These results offer insights into the spatial distribution and predominant risk profiles of various resource-based urban environmental risk, identify high-risk points, and provide valuable suggestions for management strategies in resource-based cities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there heterogeneities in environmental risks among different types of resource-based cities in China? Assessment based on environmental risk field approach\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the rapid social and economic development, urban environmental risks are surging, necessitating urgent attention to prevention, control, and management. Resource-based cities, reliant on natural resources for economic growth, grapple with environmental hazards stemming from mineral resource extraction, processing, and production. The proliferation of “high energy consumption and high emission” projects exacerbates these risks through indiscriminate development. Environmental risk profiles vary significantly across resource-based cities at different developmental stages and with diverse resource portfolios. Employing the environmental risk field theory, this study assesses environmental risks in growing (Ordos), mature (Ganzhou), declining (Baishan), and regenerating (Baotou) resource-based cities, from 2015 to 2021 at a 10 km × 10 km resolution. The research findings reveal significant heterogeneity in environmental risks among various types of resource-based cities. While environmental risks generally exhibit an upward trend across all four city types, the increase is notably more pronounced in growing and mature resource-based cities. Growing and regenerating resource-based cities exhibit relatively lower levels of environmental risk, with distinct spatial agglomeration, whereas mature and declining resource-based cities face higher overall environmental risks, demonstrating greater receptor vulnerability and environmental risk field intensity, respectively. These results offer insights into the spatial distribution and predominant risk profiles of various resource-based urban environmental risk, identify high-risk points, and provide valuable suggestions for management strategies in resource-based cities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924005727\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924005727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着社会和经济的快速发展,城市环境风险急剧上升,亟需重视预防、控制和管理。资源型城市的经济增长依赖于自然资源,在矿产资源的开采、加工和生产过程中会产生环境危害。而 "高能耗、高排放 "项目的激增则加剧了这些风险。处于不同发展阶段、拥有不同资源组合的资源型城市,其环境风险状况也大相径庭。本研究运用环境风险场理论,以 10 km × 10 km 的分辨率评估了资源型城市从 2015 年到 2021 年的成长期(鄂尔多斯)、成熟期(赣州)、衰退期(白山)和再生期(包头)的环境风险。研究结果表明,各类资源型城市的环境风险存在显著的异质性。虽然四种城市类型的环境风险总体上呈上升趋势,但成长型和成熟型资源型城市的环境风险上升更为明显。成长型和再生型资源型城市的环境风险水平相对较低,具有明显的空间聚集性,而成熟型和衰退型资源型城市面临的总体环境风险较高,分别表现出更大的受体脆弱性和环境风险场强度。这些结果有助于深入了解各种资源型城市环境风险的空间分布和主要风险特征,识别高风险点,并为资源型城市的管理策略提供有价值的建议。
Are there heterogeneities in environmental risks among different types of resource-based cities in China? Assessment based on environmental risk field approach
With the rapid social and economic development, urban environmental risks are surging, necessitating urgent attention to prevention, control, and management. Resource-based cities, reliant on natural resources for economic growth, grapple with environmental hazards stemming from mineral resource extraction, processing, and production. The proliferation of “high energy consumption and high emission” projects exacerbates these risks through indiscriminate development. Environmental risk profiles vary significantly across resource-based cities at different developmental stages and with diverse resource portfolios. Employing the environmental risk field theory, this study assesses environmental risks in growing (Ordos), mature (Ganzhou), declining (Baishan), and regenerating (Baotou) resource-based cities, from 2015 to 2021 at a 10 km × 10 km resolution. The research findings reveal significant heterogeneity in environmental risks among various types of resource-based cities. While environmental risks generally exhibit an upward trend across all four city types, the increase is notably more pronounced in growing and mature resource-based cities. Growing and regenerating resource-based cities exhibit relatively lower levels of environmental risk, with distinct spatial agglomeration, whereas mature and declining resource-based cities face higher overall environmental risks, demonstrating greater receptor vulnerability and environmental risk field intensity, respectively. These results offer insights into the spatial distribution and predominant risk profiles of various resource-based urban environmental risk, identify high-risk points, and provide valuable suggestions for management strategies in resource-based cities.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.