Social characteristics of culturally and linguistically diverse cancer patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials in South-Western Sydney.

Introduction Early phase clinical trials (EPCT) enable access to novel therapies for patients who have exhausted standard of care treatment and contribute a crucial role in drug development and research. Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) or socially disadvantaged patients have notably lower rates of participation in these trials. We aimed to characterise the social and cultural demographics of patients enrolled on an EPCT in South Western Sydney. Methods We conducted a 10-year retrospective review of patients enrolled on a EPCT at Liverpool Hospital. CALD patients were defined as those born overseas or whose preferred language was other than English. The patient residential address was used to calculate distance travelled and the Index of Relative Socio-economic advantage and disadvantage (IRSD and IRSAD) scores were calculated and used as a surrogate for socioeconomic status (SES). Results Our study included 233 patients across 39 EPCTs. Ninety-one patients (39%) were identified as CALD. The median IRSD and IRSAD scores were 941 and 944 respectively with 62.7% - 67.4% of patients residing in an area with greater disadvantage compared to the median of Australia. The median distance travelled was 17 kilometres with only 12% of participants travelling more than 50 kilometres. CALD patients were more likely to reside in an area of low SES (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.8 - 6.5, p<0.01) and travelled shorter median distances (10 vs 23 kilometres) when compared to non-CALD patients. Conclusion Our study cohort contained a lower proportion of CALD patients and a higher SES than what we might have expected from our local population. Furthermore, there was a trend toward greater SES disadvantage (lower IRSD/IRSAD scores) for the CALD population. This study provides novel Australian data to support the underrepresentation of culturally diverse or disadvantaged patients on EPCTs. Future efforts should be made to reduce barriers to participation and improve equity in clinical trial participation.