Ana Fabianne Brambila‐Rodríguez, Guillermo De La Cruz Villalobos, Juan Joel Domínguez‐Rodríguez, Héctor Oviedo‐Cruz
{"title":"在住院医师培训项目中监督测量胎儿体重的准确性","authors":"Ana Fabianne Brambila‐Rodríguez, Guillermo De La Cruz Villalobos, Juan Joel Domínguez‐Rodríguez, Héctor Oviedo‐Cruz","doi":"10.1002/jcu.23842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound estimates of fetal weight made by residents.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted on consecutive pregnancies attended in an obstetric ward. All participants provided their consent to participate. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with ultrasound evaluation and delivery within 14 days. Congenital abnormalities and stillbirths were excluded. Ultrasound scans were performed by two residents, one observer per subject, following standardized methodology and supervised by senior staff. Fetal weight was calculated using the four‐parameter Hadlock 1985 formula. Birth weight was measured using a standard clinical scale. Bland–Altman and mixed‐effects analyses were performed.ResultsIn a 6‐month period, 95 gestations were recruited at 30–41 weeks, and birth weights ranged from 1200 to 4080 g. The bias between methods was −28 g (CI95%, −74 to 18) with 95% limits of agreement of ±440 g. The 95% deviation between methods was of ±16%. Parity had the most significant effect on the bias between methods; operator and maternal weight had no significant effect.ConclusionsSupervised measurement of fetal weight by residents demonstrated high accuracy. Parity bias may be associated with visceral fat deposition independent of maternal weight gain. A methodology for medical evaluation is presented.","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of supervised measurement of fetal weight in a residency program\",\"authors\":\"Ana Fabianne Brambila‐Rodríguez, Guillermo De La Cruz Villalobos, Juan Joel Domínguez‐Rodríguez, Héctor Oviedo‐Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.23842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound estimates of fetal weight made by residents.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted on consecutive pregnancies attended in an obstetric ward. All participants provided their consent to participate. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with ultrasound evaluation and delivery within 14 days. Congenital abnormalities and stillbirths were excluded. Ultrasound scans were performed by two residents, one observer per subject, following standardized methodology and supervised by senior staff. Fetal weight was calculated using the four‐parameter Hadlock 1985 formula. Birth weight was measured using a standard clinical scale. Bland–Altman and mixed‐effects analyses were performed.ResultsIn a 6‐month period, 95 gestations were recruited at 30–41 weeks, and birth weights ranged from 1200 to 4080 g. The bias between methods was −28 g (CI95%, −74 to 18) with 95% limits of agreement of ±440 g. The 95% deviation between methods was of ±16%. Parity had the most significant effect on the bias between methods; operator and maternal weight had no significant effect.ConclusionsSupervised measurement of fetal weight by residents demonstrated high accuracy. Parity bias may be associated with visceral fat deposition independent of maternal weight gain. A methodology for medical evaluation is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23842\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of supervised measurement of fetal weight in a residency program
ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound estimates of fetal weight made by residents.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted on consecutive pregnancies attended in an obstetric ward. All participants provided their consent to participate. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with ultrasound evaluation and delivery within 14 days. Congenital abnormalities and stillbirths were excluded. Ultrasound scans were performed by two residents, one observer per subject, following standardized methodology and supervised by senior staff. Fetal weight was calculated using the four‐parameter Hadlock 1985 formula. Birth weight was measured using a standard clinical scale. Bland–Altman and mixed‐effects analyses were performed.ResultsIn a 6‐month period, 95 gestations were recruited at 30–41 weeks, and birth weights ranged from 1200 to 4080 g. The bias between methods was −28 g (CI95%, −74 to 18) with 95% limits of agreement of ±440 g. The 95% deviation between methods was of ±16%. Parity had the most significant effect on the bias between methods; operator and maternal weight had no significant effect.ConclusionsSupervised measurement of fetal weight by residents demonstrated high accuracy. Parity bias may be associated with visceral fat deposition independent of maternal weight gain. A methodology for medical evaluation is presented.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.