在住院医师培训项目中监督测量胎儿体重的准确性

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Ana Fabianne Brambila‐Rodríguez, Guillermo De La Cruz Villalobos, Juan Joel Domínguez‐Rodríguez, Héctor Oviedo‐Cruz
{"title":"在住院医师培训项目中监督测量胎儿体重的准确性","authors":"Ana Fabianne Brambila‐Rodríguez, Guillermo De La Cruz Villalobos, Juan Joel Domínguez‐Rodríguez, Héctor Oviedo‐Cruz","doi":"10.1002/jcu.23842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound estimates of fetal weight made by residents.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted on consecutive pregnancies attended in an obstetric ward. All participants provided their consent to participate. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with ultrasound evaluation and delivery within 14 days. Congenital abnormalities and stillbirths were excluded. Ultrasound scans were performed by two residents, one observer per subject, following standardized methodology and supervised by senior staff. Fetal weight was calculated using the four‐parameter Hadlock 1985 formula. Birth weight was measured using a standard clinical scale. Bland–Altman and mixed‐effects analyses were performed.ResultsIn a 6‐month period, 95 gestations were recruited at 30–41 weeks, and birth weights ranged from 1200 to 4080 g. The bias between methods was −28 g (CI95%, −74 to 18) with 95% limits of agreement of ±440 g. The 95% deviation between methods was of ±16%. Parity had the most significant effect on the bias between methods; operator and maternal weight had no significant effect.ConclusionsSupervised measurement of fetal weight by residents demonstrated high accuracy. Parity bias may be associated with visceral fat deposition independent of maternal weight gain. A methodology for medical evaluation is presented.","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of supervised measurement of fetal weight in a residency program\",\"authors\":\"Ana Fabianne Brambila‐Rodríguez, Guillermo De La Cruz Villalobos, Juan Joel Domínguez‐Rodríguez, Héctor Oviedo‐Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.23842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound estimates of fetal weight made by residents.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted on consecutive pregnancies attended in an obstetric ward. All participants provided their consent to participate. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with ultrasound evaluation and delivery within 14 days. Congenital abnormalities and stillbirths were excluded. Ultrasound scans were performed by two residents, one observer per subject, following standardized methodology and supervised by senior staff. Fetal weight was calculated using the four‐parameter Hadlock 1985 formula. Birth weight was measured using a standard clinical scale. Bland–Altman and mixed‐effects analyses were performed.ResultsIn a 6‐month period, 95 gestations were recruited at 30–41 weeks, and birth weights ranged from 1200 to 4080 g. The bias between methods was −28 g (CI95%, −74 to 18) with 95% limits of agreement of ±440 g. The 95% deviation between methods was of ±16%. Parity had the most significant effect on the bias between methods; operator and maternal weight had no significant effect.ConclusionsSupervised measurement of fetal weight by residents demonstrated high accuracy. Parity bias may be associated with visceral fat deposition independent of maternal weight gain. A methodology for medical evaluation is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23842\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23842","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 对在产科病房就诊的连续孕妇进行横断面研究。所有参与者均同意参与。纳入标准为 14 天内进行超声评估和分娩的单胎妊娠。先天畸形和死胎除外。超声波扫描由两名住院医师按照标准化方法进行,每名受试者有一名观察员,并由资深工作人员进行监督。胎儿体重采用哈德洛克 1985 年四参数公式计算。出生体重使用标准临床体重秤测量。结果 在 6 个月的时间里,共采集了 95 例 30-41 周的妊娠,出生体重从 1200 克到 4080 克不等。结论住院医师对胎儿体重的监督测量具有很高的准确性。孕妇体重增加与内脏脂肪沉积无关。本文介绍了一种医学评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of supervised measurement of fetal weight in a residency program
ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound estimates of fetal weight made by residents.MethodsA cross‐sectional study was conducted on consecutive pregnancies attended in an obstetric ward. All participants provided their consent to participate. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with ultrasound evaluation and delivery within 14 days. Congenital abnormalities and stillbirths were excluded. Ultrasound scans were performed by two residents, one observer per subject, following standardized methodology and supervised by senior staff. Fetal weight was calculated using the four‐parameter Hadlock 1985 formula. Birth weight was measured using a standard clinical scale. Bland–Altman and mixed‐effects analyses were performed.ResultsIn a 6‐month period, 95 gestations were recruited at 30–41 weeks, and birth weights ranged from 1200 to 4080 g. The bias between methods was −28 g (CI95%, −74 to 18) with 95% limits of agreement of ±440 g. The 95% deviation between methods was of ±16%. Parity had the most significant effect on the bias between methods; operator and maternal weight had no significant effect.ConclusionsSupervised measurement of fetal weight by residents demonstrated high accuracy. Parity bias may be associated with visceral fat deposition independent of maternal weight gain. A methodology for medical evaluation is presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信