Shumaila Ahmad, Sam Straw, John Gierula, Eleri Roberts, Jason Collinson, Matthew Swift, Chris Monkhouse, Lucy Broadhurst, Annabel Allan, Haqeel A Jamil, Anne Dixon, Paula Black, Ian Pinnell, Hannah Law, Natalie Archer, Fozia Ahmed, Maria F Paton
{"title":"优化心脏植入式电子设备的远程监控:英国德尔菲共识","authors":"Shumaila Ahmad, Sam Straw, John Gierula, Eleri Roberts, Jason Collinson, Matthew Swift, Chris Monkhouse, Lucy Broadhurst, Annabel Allan, Haqeel A Jamil, Anne Dixon, Paula Black, Ian Pinnell, Hannah Law, Natalie Archer, Fozia Ahmed, Maria F Paton","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Remote monitoring (RM) is recommended for the ongoing management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Despite its benefits, RM adoption has increased the workload for cardiac rhythm management teams. This study used a modified Delphi method to develop a consensus on optimal RM management for adult patients with a CIED in the UK. Methods A national steering committee comprising cardiac physiologists, cardiologists, specialist nurses, support professionals and a patient representative developed 114 statements on best RM practices, covering capacity, support, service delivery, coordination and clinical escalation. An online questionnaire was used to gather input from UK specialists, with consensus defined as ≥75% agreement. Results Between 16 October 2023 and 4 December 2023, 115 responses were received. Of the statements, 79 (69%) achieved high agreement (≥90%), 20 (18%) showed moderate agreement (75%–89%) and 15 (13%) did not achieve consensus. The highest agreement focused on patient education and support, while the lowest concerned workload distribution. Conclusions There is strong agreement on best practices for RM of CIEDs among UK healthcare professionals. Key recommendations include ensuring patient access, providing adequate resources, adopting new working methods, enhancing patient education, establishing clear clinical escalation pathways and standardising national policies. Implementing these best practices, tailored to local capabilities, is essential for effective and equitable RM services across the UK. Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising remote monitoring for cardiac implantable electronic devices: a UK Delphi consensus\",\"authors\":\"Shumaila Ahmad, Sam Straw, John Gierula, Eleri Roberts, Jason Collinson, Matthew Swift, Chris Monkhouse, Lucy Broadhurst, Annabel Allan, Haqeel A Jamil, Anne Dixon, Paula Black, Ian Pinnell, Hannah Law, Natalie Archer, Fozia Ahmed, Maria F Paton\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Remote monitoring (RM) is recommended for the ongoing management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Despite its benefits, RM adoption has increased the workload for cardiac rhythm management teams. This study used a modified Delphi method to develop a consensus on optimal RM management for adult patients with a CIED in the UK. Methods A national steering committee comprising cardiac physiologists, cardiologists, specialist nurses, support professionals and a patient representative developed 114 statements on best RM practices, covering capacity, support, service delivery, coordination and clinical escalation. An online questionnaire was used to gather input from UK specialists, with consensus defined as ≥75% agreement. Results Between 16 October 2023 and 4 December 2023, 115 responses were received. Of the statements, 79 (69%) achieved high agreement (≥90%), 20 (18%) showed moderate agreement (75%–89%) and 15 (13%) did not achieve consensus. The highest agreement focused on patient education and support, while the lowest concerned workload distribution. Conclusions There is strong agreement on best practices for RM of CIEDs among UK healthcare professionals. Key recommendations include ensuring patient access, providing adequate resources, adopting new working methods, enhancing patient education, establishing clear clinical escalation pathways and standardising national policies. Implementing these best practices, tailored to local capabilities, is essential for effective and equitable RM services across the UK. Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimising remote monitoring for cardiac implantable electronic devices: a UK Delphi consensus
Background Remote monitoring (RM) is recommended for the ongoing management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Despite its benefits, RM adoption has increased the workload for cardiac rhythm management teams. This study used a modified Delphi method to develop a consensus on optimal RM management for adult patients with a CIED in the UK. Methods A national steering committee comprising cardiac physiologists, cardiologists, specialist nurses, support professionals and a patient representative developed 114 statements on best RM practices, covering capacity, support, service delivery, coordination and clinical escalation. An online questionnaire was used to gather input from UK specialists, with consensus defined as ≥75% agreement. Results Between 16 October 2023 and 4 December 2023, 115 responses were received. Of the statements, 79 (69%) achieved high agreement (≥90%), 20 (18%) showed moderate agreement (75%–89%) and 15 (13%) did not achieve consensus. The highest agreement focused on patient education and support, while the lowest concerned workload distribution. Conclusions There is strong agreement on best practices for RM of CIEDs among UK healthcare professionals. Key recommendations include ensuring patient access, providing adequate resources, adopting new working methods, enhancing patient education, establishing clear clinical escalation pathways and standardising national policies. Implementing these best practices, tailored to local capabilities, is essential for effective and equitable RM services across the UK. Data are available on reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.
期刊介绍:
Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.