将硅学和分子技术结合起来,对海洋布鲁氏菌 ceti 和布鲁氏菌 pinnipedialis 进行鉴别和毒力鉴定

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Guillaume Girault, Luca Freddi, Maryne Jay, Ludivine Perrot, Alexandre Dremeau, Antoine Drapeau, Sabine Delannoy, Patrick Fach, Acacia Ferreira Vicente, Virginie Mick, Claire Ponsart, Vitomir Djokic
{"title":"将硅学和分子技术结合起来,对海洋布鲁氏菌 ceti 和布鲁氏菌 pinnipedialis 进行鉴别和毒力鉴定","authors":"Guillaume Girault, Luca Freddi, Maryne Jay, Ludivine Perrot, Alexandre Dremeau, Antoine Drapeau, Sabine Delannoy, Patrick Fach, Acacia Ferreira Vicente, Virginie Mick, Claire Ponsart, Vitomir Djokic","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2024.1437408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionMammals are the main hosts for <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> sp., agents of worldwide zoonosis. Marine cetaceans and pinnipeds can be infected by <jats:italic>Brucella ceti</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. pinnipedialis</jats:italic>, respectively. Besides classical bacteriological typing, molecular approaches such as MLVA, MLSA, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can differentiate these species but are cumbersome to perform.MethodsWe compared the DNA and genome sequences of 12 strains isolated from nine marine mammals, with highly zoonotic <jats:italic>B. melitensis</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>B. abortus</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>B. suis</jats:italic>, and the publicly available genomes of <jats:italic>B. ceti</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. pinnipedialis. In silico</jats:italic> pipelines were used to detect the antimicrobial resistance (AMR), plasmid, and virulence genes (VGs) by screening six open-source and one home-made library.Results and discussionOur results show that easier-to-use HRM-PCR, Bruce-ladder, and Suis-ladder can separate marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> sp., and the results are fully concordant with other molecular methods, such as WGS. However, the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method cannot discriminate between <jats:italic>B. pinnipedialis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. ceti</jats:italic> B1-94-like isolates. MLVA-16 results divided the investigated strains into three clades according to their preferred host, which was confirmed in WGS. <jats:italic>In silico</jats:italic> analysis did not find any AMR and plasmid genes, suggesting antimicrobial susceptibility of marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic>, while the presence of the VGs <jats:italic>btpA</jats:italic> gene was variable dependent on the clade.ConclusionThe HRM-PCR and Suis-ladder are quick, easy, and cost-effective methods to identify marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> sp. Moreover, <jats:italic>in silico</jats:italic> genome analyses can give useful insights into the genetic virulence and pathogenicity potential of marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> strains.","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of in silico and molecular techniques for discrimination and virulence characterization of marine Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Girault, Luca Freddi, Maryne Jay, Ludivine Perrot, Alexandre Dremeau, Antoine Drapeau, Sabine Delannoy, Patrick Fach, Acacia Ferreira Vicente, Virginie Mick, Claire Ponsart, Vitomir Djokic\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmicb.2024.1437408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionMammals are the main hosts for <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> sp., agents of worldwide zoonosis. Marine cetaceans and pinnipeds can be infected by <jats:italic>Brucella ceti</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. pinnipedialis</jats:italic>, respectively. Besides classical bacteriological typing, molecular approaches such as MLVA, MLSA, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can differentiate these species but are cumbersome to perform.MethodsWe compared the DNA and genome sequences of 12 strains isolated from nine marine mammals, with highly zoonotic <jats:italic>B. melitensis</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>B. abortus</jats:italic>, and <jats:italic>B. suis</jats:italic>, and the publicly available genomes of <jats:italic>B. ceti</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. pinnipedialis. In silico</jats:italic> pipelines were used to detect the antimicrobial resistance (AMR), plasmid, and virulence genes (VGs) by screening six open-source and one home-made library.Results and discussionOur results show that easier-to-use HRM-PCR, Bruce-ladder, and Suis-ladder can separate marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> sp., and the results are fully concordant with other molecular methods, such as WGS. However, the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method cannot discriminate between <jats:italic>B. pinnipedialis</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>B. ceti</jats:italic> B1-94-like isolates. MLVA-16 results divided the investigated strains into three clades according to their preferred host, which was confirmed in WGS. <jats:italic>In silico</jats:italic> analysis did not find any AMR and plasmid genes, suggesting antimicrobial susceptibility of marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic>, while the presence of the VGs <jats:italic>btpA</jats:italic> gene was variable dependent on the clade.ConclusionThe HRM-PCR and Suis-ladder are quick, easy, and cost-effective methods to identify marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> sp. Moreover, <jats:italic>in silico</jats:italic> genome analyses can give useful insights into the genetic virulence and pathogenicity potential of marine <jats:italic>Brucella</jats:italic> strains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1437408\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1437408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言哺乳动物是布鲁氏菌的主要宿主,布鲁氏菌是全球人畜共患病的病原体。海洋鲸目动物和针足类动物可分别感染 ceti 布鲁氏菌和 B. pinnipedialis 布鲁氏菌。除了传统的细菌学分型外,MLVA、MLSA 和全基因组测序(WGS)等分子方法也能区分这些物种,但操作繁琐。方法我们比较了从 9 种海洋哺乳动物体内分离出的 12 株菌株的 DNA 和基因组序列,以及高度人畜共患的梅毒布鲁氏菌、流产布鲁氏菌和鼠疫布鲁氏菌,以及可公开获得的 ceti 和 pinnipedialis 布鲁氏菌基因组。结果与讨论我们的研究结果表明,使用更简便的 HRM-PCR、Bruce-ladder 和 Suis-ladder 可以分离海洋布鲁氏菌,其结果与其他分子方法(如 WGS)完全一致。然而,限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)方法不能区分B. pinnipedialis和B. ceti B1-94类分离物。MLVA-16 的结果根据调查菌株的偏好宿主将其分为三个支系,这在 WGS 中得到了证实。结论 HRM-PCR和Suis-ladder是快速、简便且经济有效的鉴定海洋布鲁氏菌的方法,此外,硅基因组分析可为海洋布鲁氏菌菌株的遗传毒性和致病潜力提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination of in silico and molecular techniques for discrimination and virulence characterization of marine Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis
IntroductionMammals are the main hosts for Brucella sp., agents of worldwide zoonosis. Marine cetaceans and pinnipeds can be infected by Brucella ceti and B. pinnipedialis, respectively. Besides classical bacteriological typing, molecular approaches such as MLVA, MLSA, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can differentiate these species but are cumbersome to perform.MethodsWe compared the DNA and genome sequences of 12 strains isolated from nine marine mammals, with highly zoonotic B. melitensis, B. abortus, and B. suis, and the publicly available genomes of B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis. In silico pipelines were used to detect the antimicrobial resistance (AMR), plasmid, and virulence genes (VGs) by screening six open-source and one home-made library.Results and discussionOur results show that easier-to-use HRM-PCR, Bruce-ladder, and Suis-ladder can separate marine Brucella sp., and the results are fully concordant with other molecular methods, such as WGS. However, the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method cannot discriminate between B. pinnipedialis and B. ceti B1-94-like isolates. MLVA-16 results divided the investigated strains into three clades according to their preferred host, which was confirmed in WGS. In silico analysis did not find any AMR and plasmid genes, suggesting antimicrobial susceptibility of marine Brucella, while the presence of the VGs btpA gene was variable dependent on the clade.ConclusionThe HRM-PCR and Suis-ladder are quick, easy, and cost-effective methods to identify marine Brucella sp. Moreover, in silico genome analyses can give useful insights into the genetic virulence and pathogenicity potential of marine Brucella strains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信