{"title":"基于 LPI 的液化场地响应谱修正系数","authors":"Chi-Chin Tsai, Chun-Yu Kan, Yi-Wei Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02005-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Liquefaction can significantly alter the ground response. However, no existing design spectrum accounts for the severity of soil liquefaction. This work aims to develop correction factors that can be used to adjust code-based design spectra to reflect the specific liquefaction susceptibility of a site. The correction factor is derived as the ratio of response spectra calculated by two types of 1D nonlinear site response analyses: effective stress analysis, which can model porewater pressure (PWP) generation, and total stress analysis. We considered seven real profiles and 200 motions in our analysis. Four combinations of soil nonlinear models and PWP generation models are also utilized to account for epistemic uncertainties. Results show that the response spectral ratio for liquefied sites typically falls below one for periods less than 1–2 s and rises above one for longer periods. Meanwhile, the response spectral ratio reflects the overall liquefaction susceptibility influenced by PWP, factor of safety, and liquefiable layer depth, while the liquefaction potential index (LPI) captures their complex interplay. Accordingly, we propose four LPI-dependent factors: three correction factors for peak ground acceleration, 0.2 s spectral acceleration (Sa), and 1.0 s Sa, and a long-period adjustment factor applicable for periods exceeding 1 s. The correction factors linearly decrease with increasing LPI, while the adjustment factor exhibits the opposite trend. A design spectrum for a liquefiable site can be readily constructed by adjusting the code-based design spectrum using the proposed correction factor, as illustrated in the example. This approach is applicable as long as LPI is available from a simplified liquefaction analysis or a liquefaction hazard map.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 13","pages":"6281 - 6303"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LPI-based correction factor for response spectrum at liquefied sites\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Chin Tsai, Chun-Yu Kan, Yi-Wei Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-02005-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Liquefaction can significantly alter the ground response. However, no existing design spectrum accounts for the severity of soil liquefaction. This work aims to develop correction factors that can be used to adjust code-based design spectra to reflect the specific liquefaction susceptibility of a site. The correction factor is derived as the ratio of response spectra calculated by two types of 1D nonlinear site response analyses: effective stress analysis, which can model porewater pressure (PWP) generation, and total stress analysis. We considered seven real profiles and 200 motions in our analysis. Four combinations of soil nonlinear models and PWP generation models are also utilized to account for epistemic uncertainties. Results show that the response spectral ratio for liquefied sites typically falls below one for periods less than 1–2 s and rises above one for longer periods. Meanwhile, the response spectral ratio reflects the overall liquefaction susceptibility influenced by PWP, factor of safety, and liquefiable layer depth, while the liquefaction potential index (LPI) captures their complex interplay. Accordingly, we propose four LPI-dependent factors: three correction factors for peak ground acceleration, 0.2 s spectral acceleration (Sa), and 1.0 s Sa, and a long-period adjustment factor applicable for periods exceeding 1 s. The correction factors linearly decrease with increasing LPI, while the adjustment factor exhibits the opposite trend. A design spectrum for a liquefiable site can be readily constructed by adjusting the code-based design spectrum using the proposed correction factor, as illustrated in the example. This approach is applicable as long as LPI is available from a simplified liquefaction analysis or a liquefaction hazard map.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"22 13\",\"pages\":\"6281 - 6303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02005-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02005-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
LPI-based correction factor for response spectrum at liquefied sites
Liquefaction can significantly alter the ground response. However, no existing design spectrum accounts for the severity of soil liquefaction. This work aims to develop correction factors that can be used to adjust code-based design spectra to reflect the specific liquefaction susceptibility of a site. The correction factor is derived as the ratio of response spectra calculated by two types of 1D nonlinear site response analyses: effective stress analysis, which can model porewater pressure (PWP) generation, and total stress analysis. We considered seven real profiles and 200 motions in our analysis. Four combinations of soil nonlinear models and PWP generation models are also utilized to account for epistemic uncertainties. Results show that the response spectral ratio for liquefied sites typically falls below one for periods less than 1–2 s and rises above one for longer periods. Meanwhile, the response spectral ratio reflects the overall liquefaction susceptibility influenced by PWP, factor of safety, and liquefiable layer depth, while the liquefaction potential index (LPI) captures their complex interplay. Accordingly, we propose four LPI-dependent factors: three correction factors for peak ground acceleration, 0.2 s spectral acceleration (Sa), and 1.0 s Sa, and a long-period adjustment factor applicable for periods exceeding 1 s. The correction factors linearly decrease with increasing LPI, while the adjustment factor exhibits the opposite trend. A design spectrum for a liquefiable site can be readily constructed by adjusting the code-based design spectrum using the proposed correction factor, as illustrated in the example. This approach is applicable as long as LPI is available from a simplified liquefaction analysis or a liquefaction hazard map.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.