通过前外侧切口进行肺移植术后镇痛的连续前锯肌平面阻滞:一项试点研究

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ge Luo, Tingting Ni, Xinchen Tao, Jie Xiao, Yuanyuan Yao, Man Huang, Jingyu Chen, Min Yan
{"title":"通过前外侧切口进行肺移植术后镇痛的连续前锯肌平面阻滞:一项试点研究","authors":"Ge Luo, Tingting Ni, Xinchen Tao, Jie Xiao, Yuanyuan Yao, Man Huang, Jingyu Chen, Min Yan","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1438580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundUnilateral or bilateral anterolateral thoracotomy May lead to severe acute pain in lung transplantation (LTx). Although serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is apparently effective for pain control after open thoracic surgery, there remains a lack of evidence for the application of SAPB for postoperative analgesia after LTx.ObjectiveIn this case series pilot study, we describe the feasibility of continuous SAPB after lung transplantation and provide a preliminary investigation of its safety and efficacy.MethodsAfter chest incisions closure was complete, all patients underwent ultrasound-guided SAPB with catheter insertion. Numerical rating scale (NRS), additional opioid consumption, time to endotracheal tube removal, ICU length of stay, and catheter-related adverse events were followed up and recorded for each patient within 1 week after the procedure.ResultsA total of 14 patients who received LTx at this center from August 2023 to November 2023 were included. All patients received anterolateral approaches, and 10 (71.4%) of them underwent bilateral LTx. The duration of catheter placement was 2 (2–3) days, and the Resting NRS during catheter placement was equal to or less than 4. A total of 11 patients (78.6%) were supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in LTx, whereas 8 patients (57.1%) removed the tracheal tube on the first day after LTx. Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 5 (3–6) days, with tracheal intubation retained for 1 (1–2) days, and only one patient was reintubated. The morphine equivalent dose (MED) in the first week after LTx was 11.95 mg, and no catheter-related adverse events were detected.LimitationsWe did not assess the sensory loss plane due to the retrospective design. In addition, differences in catheter placement time May lead to bias in pain assessment.ConclusionAlthough continuous SAPB May be a safe and effective fascial block technique for relieving acute pain after LTx, it should be confirmed by high-quality clinical studies.","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous serratus anterior plane block for postoperative analgesia following lung transplantation via anterolateral incision: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Ge Luo, Tingting Ni, Xinchen Tao, Jie Xiao, Yuanyuan Yao, Man Huang, Jingyu Chen, Min Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1438580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundUnilateral or bilateral anterolateral thoracotomy May lead to severe acute pain in lung transplantation (LTx). Although serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is apparently effective for pain control after open thoracic surgery, there remains a lack of evidence for the application of SAPB for postoperative analgesia after LTx.ObjectiveIn this case series pilot study, we describe the feasibility of continuous SAPB after lung transplantation and provide a preliminary investigation of its safety and efficacy.MethodsAfter chest incisions closure was complete, all patients underwent ultrasound-guided SAPB with catheter insertion. Numerical rating scale (NRS), additional opioid consumption, time to endotracheal tube removal, ICU length of stay, and catheter-related adverse events were followed up and recorded for each patient within 1 week after the procedure.ResultsA total of 14 patients who received LTx at this center from August 2023 to November 2023 were included. All patients received anterolateral approaches, and 10 (71.4%) of them underwent bilateral LTx. The duration of catheter placement was 2 (2–3) days, and the Resting NRS during catheter placement was equal to or less than 4. A total of 11 patients (78.6%) were supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in LTx, whereas 8 patients (57.1%) removed the tracheal tube on the first day after LTx. Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 5 (3–6) days, with tracheal intubation retained for 1 (1–2) days, and only one patient was reintubated. The morphine equivalent dose (MED) in the first week after LTx was 11.95 mg, and no catheter-related adverse events were detected.LimitationsWe did not assess the sensory loss plane due to the retrospective design. In addition, differences in catheter placement time May lead to bias in pain assessment.ConclusionAlthough continuous SAPB May be a safe and effective fascial block technique for relieving acute pain after LTx, it should be confirmed by high-quality clinical studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1438580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1438580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景单侧或双侧前外侧胸廓切开术可能导致肺移植(LTx)术后剧烈疼痛。尽管前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)对开胸手术后的疼痛控制明显有效,但目前仍缺乏将 SAPB 应用于肺移植术后镇痛的证据。目的在这项病例系列试点研究中,我们描述了肺移植术后持续 SAPB 的可行性,并对其安全性和有效性进行了初步调查。方法在胸部切口关闭完成后,所有患者都在超声引导下进行了 SAPB,并插入了导管。结果共纳入2023年8月至2023年11月在该中心接受LTx的14例患者。所有患者均接受了前外侧入路,其中 10 人(71.4%)接受了双侧 LTx。导管置入时间为2(2-3)天,导管置入期间的静息NRS等于或小于4。共有11名患者(78.6%)在LTx期间接受了体外膜氧合(ECMO)支持,8名患者(57.1%)在LTx后的第一天拔除了气管插管。重症监护室(ICU)的住院时间为5(3-6)天,保留气管插管的时间为1(1-2)天,只有一名患者重新插管。LTx术后第一周的吗啡当量剂量(MED)为11.95毫克,未发现导管相关不良事件。结论尽管连续SAPB可能是一种安全有效的筋膜阻滞技术,可用于缓解LTx术后的急性疼痛,但仍应通过高质量的临床研究加以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous serratus anterior plane block for postoperative analgesia following lung transplantation via anterolateral incision: a pilot study
BackgroundUnilateral or bilateral anterolateral thoracotomy May lead to severe acute pain in lung transplantation (LTx). Although serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is apparently effective for pain control after open thoracic surgery, there remains a lack of evidence for the application of SAPB for postoperative analgesia after LTx.ObjectiveIn this case series pilot study, we describe the feasibility of continuous SAPB after lung transplantation and provide a preliminary investigation of its safety and efficacy.MethodsAfter chest incisions closure was complete, all patients underwent ultrasound-guided SAPB with catheter insertion. Numerical rating scale (NRS), additional opioid consumption, time to endotracheal tube removal, ICU length of stay, and catheter-related adverse events were followed up and recorded for each patient within 1 week after the procedure.ResultsA total of 14 patients who received LTx at this center from August 2023 to November 2023 were included. All patients received anterolateral approaches, and 10 (71.4%) of them underwent bilateral LTx. The duration of catheter placement was 2 (2–3) days, and the Resting NRS during catheter placement was equal to or less than 4. A total of 11 patients (78.6%) were supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in LTx, whereas 8 patients (57.1%) removed the tracheal tube on the first day after LTx. Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 5 (3–6) days, with tracheal intubation retained for 1 (1–2) days, and only one patient was reintubated. The morphine equivalent dose (MED) in the first week after LTx was 11.95 mg, and no catheter-related adverse events were detected.LimitationsWe did not assess the sensory loss plane due to the retrospective design. In addition, differences in catheter placement time May lead to bias in pain assessment.ConclusionAlthough continuous SAPB May be a safe and effective fascial block technique for relieving acute pain after LTx, it should be confirmed by high-quality clinical studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信