小切口结合间断埋线眼睑成形术:柔性-刚性固定术

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jingjing Cao, Lingling Yan
{"title":"小切口结合间断埋线眼睑成形术:柔性-刚性固定术","authors":"Jingjing Cao, Lingling Yan","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1383937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe traditional full incision blepharoplasty is the most commonly used in Asia. However, it has significant drawbacks like long recovery period, excessive surgical marks etc. We offer a new suture idea and combine it with interrupted suture buried blepharoplasty to improve these disadvantages.MethodsIn our procedure, the orbital septum is opened and separating the levator aponeurosis-the retro-orbital septum complex under this 3–5 millimeters small incision, a flexible-rigid fixation would be made: suture fixation was made to the tarsus-the complex-lower lip orbicularis oculi muscle. We interrupted bury the sutures in the uncut skin between the two small incisions.ResultsThis paper included 333 patients divided into small incision groups using flexible-rigid fixation (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 244, 73.3%) and full incision groups using rigid fixation (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 89, 26.7%). Both at 6-month and at 5-year postoperative follow-up, the satisfaction of small incision group was statistically higher than the full incision group. The overall postoperative complication rate was statistically significantly less in the small incision. The permanence was not statistically different. For Assignment of Postoperative Effort Score (PES) results, at 6 months postoperatively, the mean score was 8.29 ± 1.32 in the small incision group, 7.86 ± 1.54 in the full incision group. At 5 years postoperatively, the mean score was 7.48 ± 1.45 in the small incision group, 7.51 ± 1.73 in the full incision group. None were statistically different.ConclusionThe small incisions group achieves a higher level of patient satisfaction and more mild trauma in the surgical area, has a low complication rate, and a decent degree of durability.","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The small incisions combined with interrupted buried suture blepharoplasty: flexible-rigid fixation\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Cao, Lingling Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1383937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe traditional full incision blepharoplasty is the most commonly used in Asia. However, it has significant drawbacks like long recovery period, excessive surgical marks etc. We offer a new suture idea and combine it with interrupted suture buried blepharoplasty to improve these disadvantages.MethodsIn our procedure, the orbital septum is opened and separating the levator aponeurosis-the retro-orbital septum complex under this 3–5 millimeters small incision, a flexible-rigid fixation would be made: suture fixation was made to the tarsus-the complex-lower lip orbicularis oculi muscle. We interrupted bury the sutures in the uncut skin between the two small incisions.ResultsThis paper included 333 patients divided into small incision groups using flexible-rigid fixation (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 244, 73.3%) and full incision groups using rigid fixation (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 89, 26.7%). Both at 6-month and at 5-year postoperative follow-up, the satisfaction of small incision group was statistically higher than the full incision group. The overall postoperative complication rate was statistically significantly less in the small incision. The permanence was not statistically different. For Assignment of Postoperative Effort Score (PES) results, at 6 months postoperatively, the mean score was 8.29 ± 1.32 in the small incision group, 7.86 ± 1.54 in the full incision group. At 5 years postoperatively, the mean score was 7.48 ± 1.45 in the small incision group, 7.51 ± 1.73 in the full incision group. None were statistically different.ConclusionThe small incisions group achieves a higher level of patient satisfaction and more mild trauma in the surgical area, has a low complication rate, and a decent degree of durability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1383937\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1383937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景传统的全切口眼睑成形术在亚洲最常用。然而,它也有明显的缺点,如恢复期长、手术痕迹过多等。我们提供了一种新的缝合理念,并将其与间断缝合埋线重睑成形术相结合,以改善这些缺点。方法在我们的手术中,打开眶隔,在这个 3-5 毫米的小切口下分离提上睑肌腱膜-眶隔后复合体,进行柔性-刚性固定:缝合固定到跗骨-复合体-下唇眼轮匝肌。我们将缝线间断埋入两个小切口之间未切开的皮肤中。结果本文共纳入 333 例患者,分为使用柔性-刚性固定的小切口组(244 例,73.3%)和使用刚性固定的全切口组(89 例,26.7%)。在术后6个月和5年的随访中,小切口组的满意度均高于全切口组。据统计,小切口组的术后并发症发生率明显低于全切口组。永久性无统计学差异。在术后努力程度评分(PES)结果分配方面,术后 6 个月时,小切口组的平均得分为(8.29 ± 1.32),全切口组为(7.86 ± 1.54)。术后 5 年,小切口组的平均得分是 7.48 ± 1.45,全切口组是 7.51 ± 1.73。结论:小切口组的患者满意度更高,手术区域的创伤更轻微,并发症发生率低,耐用性也不错。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The small incisions combined with interrupted buried suture blepharoplasty: flexible-rigid fixation
BackgroundThe traditional full incision blepharoplasty is the most commonly used in Asia. However, it has significant drawbacks like long recovery period, excessive surgical marks etc. We offer a new suture idea and combine it with interrupted suture buried blepharoplasty to improve these disadvantages.MethodsIn our procedure, the orbital septum is opened and separating the levator aponeurosis-the retro-orbital septum complex under this 3–5 millimeters small incision, a flexible-rigid fixation would be made: suture fixation was made to the tarsus-the complex-lower lip orbicularis oculi muscle. We interrupted bury the sutures in the uncut skin between the two small incisions.ResultsThis paper included 333 patients divided into small incision groups using flexible-rigid fixation (n = 244, 73.3%) and full incision groups using rigid fixation (n = 89, 26.7%). Both at 6-month and at 5-year postoperative follow-up, the satisfaction of small incision group was statistically higher than the full incision group. The overall postoperative complication rate was statistically significantly less in the small incision. The permanence was not statistically different. For Assignment of Postoperative Effort Score (PES) results, at 6 months postoperatively, the mean score was 8.29 ± 1.32 in the small incision group, 7.86 ± 1.54 in the full incision group. At 5 years postoperatively, the mean score was 7.48 ± 1.45 in the small incision group, 7.51 ± 1.73 in the full incision group. None were statistically different.ConclusionThe small incisions group achieves a higher level of patient satisfaction and more mild trauma in the surgical area, has a low complication rate, and a decent degree of durability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信