Frederic Gnepa Mehon, Klaus Zuberbühler, Claudia Stephan
{"title":"腻鼻猴(Cercopithecus nictitans)鸣叫顺序的种群差异","authors":"Frederic Gnepa Mehon, Klaus Zuberbühler, Claudia Stephan","doi":"10.1007/s10329-024-01155-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Non-human primates generally lack the ability to learn new call structures or to substantially modify existing ones, suggesting that callers need alternative mechanisms to convey information. One way to escape the constraints of limited vocal control is by assembling calls into variable sequences, as has been documented in various animal species. Here, we were interested in the flexibility with which different calls might be assembled in a species known for its meaningful call order, putty-nosed monkeys (<i>Cercopithecus nictitans</i>). Since most information comes from studies conducted at Gashaka Gumti National Park (Nigeria), we tested two further populations in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park (Republic of the Congo) and Taï National Park (Côte d’Ivoire) in how males responded to common threats, leopards, and crowned eagles. As predicted, callers produced the same basic call types as seen elsewhere—long ‘pyow’, short ‘pyow’ (‘kek’), ‘hack’—but populations differed in how males assembled calls. To leopards, males from both populations started with ‘pyows’ and ‘keks’, with occasional hacks later, as already reported from Gashaka. To crowned eagle, however, Nouabalé-Ndoki males consistently initiated their responses with ‘pyows’, whereas neither Taï nor Gashaka males ever did, demonstrating that nonhuman primates have some control over sequence production. We discuss possible mechanisms to account for the population differences, predation pressure, and male–male competition, and address implications for linguistic theories of animal call order, notably the Urgency and Informativity Principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":20468,"journal":{"name":"Primates","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population differences in putty-nosed monkey (Cercopithecus nictitans) call order\",\"authors\":\"Frederic Gnepa Mehon, Klaus Zuberbühler, Claudia Stephan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10329-024-01155-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Non-human primates generally lack the ability to learn new call structures or to substantially modify existing ones, suggesting that callers need alternative mechanisms to convey information. One way to escape the constraints of limited vocal control is by assembling calls into variable sequences, as has been documented in various animal species. Here, we were interested in the flexibility with which different calls might be assembled in a species known for its meaningful call order, putty-nosed monkeys (<i>Cercopithecus nictitans</i>). Since most information comes from studies conducted at Gashaka Gumti National Park (Nigeria), we tested two further populations in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park (Republic of the Congo) and Taï National Park (Côte d’Ivoire) in how males responded to common threats, leopards, and crowned eagles. As predicted, callers produced the same basic call types as seen elsewhere—long ‘pyow’, short ‘pyow’ (‘kek’), ‘hack’—but populations differed in how males assembled calls. To leopards, males from both populations started with ‘pyows’ and ‘keks’, with occasional hacks later, as already reported from Gashaka. To crowned eagle, however, Nouabalé-Ndoki males consistently initiated their responses with ‘pyows’, whereas neither Taï nor Gashaka males ever did, demonstrating that nonhuman primates have some control over sequence production. We discuss possible mechanisms to account for the population differences, predation pressure, and male–male competition, and address implications for linguistic theories of animal call order, notably the Urgency and Informativity Principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primates\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-024-01155-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primates","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-024-01155-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非人类灵长类通常缺乏学习新的叫声结构或对现有叫声结构进行重大修改的能力,这表明叫声需要有其他机制来传递信息。摆脱有限发声控制限制的一种方法是将叫声组合成可变序列,这在各种动物中都有记载。在这里,我们想了解的是,在腻鼻猴(Cercopithecus nictitans)这一以有意义的鸣叫顺序而闻名的物种中,不同的鸣叫可以灵活地组合在一起。由于大多数信息都来自于在尼日利亚加沙卡古姆蒂国家公园(Gashaka Gumti National Park)进行的研究,我们对刚果共和国努瓦巴莱-恩多基国家公园(Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park)和科特迪瓦塔伊国家公园(Taï National Park)的另外两个种群进行了测试,以了解雄性腻鼻猴对常见威胁、豹和冠鹰的反应。正如预测的那样,雄鸟发出的基本鸣叫类型与其他地方的雄鸟相同--长的 "pyow"、短的 "pyow"("kek")、"hack"--但不同种群的雄鸟组合鸣叫的方式不同。对豹子而言,两个种群的雄性都从 "pyow "和 "kek "开始,之后偶尔会发出 "hack "的叫声,这在加沙卡已经有报道。然而,对于冠鹰,努瓦巴莱-恩多基(Nouabalé-Ndoki)种群的雄性一直以 "pyows "开始回应,而塔伊(Taï)和加沙卡(Gashaka)种群的雄性则从未这样做,这表明非人灵长类对序列的产生有一定的控制能力。我们讨论了解释种群差异、捕食压力和雄性竞争的可能机制,并探讨了动物鸣叫顺序的语言学理论,特别是紧迫性和信息性原则的影响。
Population differences in putty-nosed monkey (Cercopithecus nictitans) call order
Non-human primates generally lack the ability to learn new call structures or to substantially modify existing ones, suggesting that callers need alternative mechanisms to convey information. One way to escape the constraints of limited vocal control is by assembling calls into variable sequences, as has been documented in various animal species. Here, we were interested in the flexibility with which different calls might be assembled in a species known for its meaningful call order, putty-nosed monkeys (Cercopithecus nictitans). Since most information comes from studies conducted at Gashaka Gumti National Park (Nigeria), we tested two further populations in the Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park (Republic of the Congo) and Taï National Park (Côte d’Ivoire) in how males responded to common threats, leopards, and crowned eagles. As predicted, callers produced the same basic call types as seen elsewhere—long ‘pyow’, short ‘pyow’ (‘kek’), ‘hack’—but populations differed in how males assembled calls. To leopards, males from both populations started with ‘pyows’ and ‘keks’, with occasional hacks later, as already reported from Gashaka. To crowned eagle, however, Nouabalé-Ndoki males consistently initiated their responses with ‘pyows’, whereas neither Taï nor Gashaka males ever did, demonstrating that nonhuman primates have some control over sequence production. We discuss possible mechanisms to account for the population differences, predation pressure, and male–male competition, and address implications for linguistic theories of animal call order, notably the Urgency and Informativity Principles.
期刊介绍:
Primates is an international journal of primatology whose aim is to provide a forum for the elucidation of all aspects of primates. The oldest primatological journal, Primates publishes original papers that advance the scientific study of primates, and its scope embraces work in diverse fields covering biological bases of behavior, socio-ecology, learning and cognition, social processes, systematics, evolution, and medicine. Contributions relevant to conservation of natural populations and welfare of captive primates are welcome. Studies focusing on nonprimate species may be considered if their relevance to primatology is clear. Original Articles as well as Review Articles, News and Perspectives, and Book Reviews are included. All manuscripts received are initially screened for suitability by members of the Editorial Board, taking into account style and ethical issues, leading to a swift decision about whether to send the manuscript for external review.