培养不可培养微生物的琼脂替代品

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
K. Demin, E. Prazdnova, M. Kulikov, M. Mazanko, A. Gorovtsov
{"title":"培养不可培养微生物的琼脂替代品","authors":"K. Demin,&nbsp;E. Prazdnova,&nbsp;M. Kulikov,&nbsp;M. Mazanko,&nbsp;A. Gorovtsov","doi":"10.1007/s00203-024-04139-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gelling agents are necessary for the preparation of solid or semisolid media. For more than a hundred years, agar has been the primary gelling agent. However, a substantial body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that agar-based media inhibit the growth of many microbial species through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), toxic organic contaminants, or competitive exclusion effects. In this review we have compiled the largest amount of data to date on the use of various gelling agents in microbial isolation and cultivation, with the particular emphasis on rare microbe isolation cases. Our analysis suggested that microbial-derived compounds (especially gellan gum), as gelling agents, are superior to agar in their ability to isolate and maintain either new or known microbial species. We analyzed the reasons behind this success and concluded that there are phylum-level differences in microbial responses to the changes in conditions from natural to the laboratory conditions (with respect to gelling agent usage). Consequently, we hypothesize that at least partial success of microbial-derived gelling agents lies in the recreation of the natural microenvironment conditions (which we address as the “familiarity of conditions” hypothesis). Finally, we present a list of recommendations and suggestions for further microbial ecology studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8279,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative agar substitutes for culturing unculturable microorganisms\",\"authors\":\"K. Demin,&nbsp;E. Prazdnova,&nbsp;M. Kulikov,&nbsp;M. Mazanko,&nbsp;A. Gorovtsov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00203-024-04139-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Gelling agents are necessary for the preparation of solid or semisolid media. For more than a hundred years, agar has been the primary gelling agent. However, a substantial body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that agar-based media inhibit the growth of many microbial species through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), toxic organic contaminants, or competitive exclusion effects. In this review we have compiled the largest amount of data to date on the use of various gelling agents in microbial isolation and cultivation, with the particular emphasis on rare microbe isolation cases. Our analysis suggested that microbial-derived compounds (especially gellan gum), as gelling agents, are superior to agar in their ability to isolate and maintain either new or known microbial species. We analyzed the reasons behind this success and concluded that there are phylum-level differences in microbial responses to the changes in conditions from natural to the laboratory conditions (with respect to gelling agent usage). Consequently, we hypothesize that at least partial success of microbial-derived gelling agents lies in the recreation of the natural microenvironment conditions (which we address as the “familiarity of conditions” hypothesis). Finally, we present a list of recommendations and suggestions for further microbial ecology studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-024-04139-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-024-04139-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胶凝剂是制备固体或半固体培养基所必需的。一百多年来,琼脂一直是主要的胶凝剂。然而,大量证据表明,琼脂基培养基会通过产生活性氧(ROS)、有毒有机污染物或竞争排斥效应来抑制多种微生物的生长。在本综述中,我们汇编了迄今为止有关在微生物分离和培养中使用各种胶凝剂的最大量数据,并特别强调了罕见微生物分离案例。我们的分析表明,微生物衍生化合物(尤其是结冷胶)作为胶凝剂,在分离和维持新的或已知微生物物种的能力方面优于琼脂。我们分析了这一成功背后的原因,并得出结论:从自然条件到实验室条件(关于胶凝剂的使用)的变化,微生物的反应存在门级差异。因此,我们假设,微生物衍生胶凝剂的成功至少部分取决于自然微环境条件的再创造(我们将其称为 "条件熟悉性 "假设)。最后,我们为进一步的微生物生态学研究提出了一系列建议和意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Alternative agar substitutes for culturing unculturable microorganisms

Alternative agar substitutes for culturing unculturable microorganisms

Gelling agents are necessary for the preparation of solid or semisolid media. For more than a hundred years, agar has been the primary gelling agent. However, a substantial body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that agar-based media inhibit the growth of many microbial species through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), toxic organic contaminants, or competitive exclusion effects. In this review we have compiled the largest amount of data to date on the use of various gelling agents in microbial isolation and cultivation, with the particular emphasis on rare microbe isolation cases. Our analysis suggested that microbial-derived compounds (especially gellan gum), as gelling agents, are superior to agar in their ability to isolate and maintain either new or known microbial species. We analyzed the reasons behind this success and concluded that there are phylum-level differences in microbial responses to the changes in conditions from natural to the laboratory conditions (with respect to gelling agent usage). Consequently, we hypothesize that at least partial success of microbial-derived gelling agents lies in the recreation of the natural microenvironment conditions (which we address as the “familiarity of conditions” hypothesis). Finally, we present a list of recommendations and suggestions for further microbial ecology studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Microbiology
Archives of Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Research papers must make a significant and original contribution to microbiology and be of interest to a broad readership. The results of any experimental approach that meets these objectives are welcome, particularly biochemical, molecular genetic, physiological, and/or physical investigations into microbial cells and their interactions with their environments, including their eukaryotic hosts. Mini-reviews in areas of special topical interest and papers on medical microbiology, ecology and systematics, including description of novel taxa, are also published. Theoretical papers and those that report on the analysis or ''mining'' of data are acceptable in principle if new information, interpretations, or hypotheses emerge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信