采用 QBD 方法的稳定性指示 RP-HPLC 法同时估算用于治疗神经痛的普瑞巴林和度洛西汀

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Vaishnavi A. Gosavi, Mahesh M. Deshpande, Gauri D. Ghangale, Machindra J. Chavan
{"title":"采用 QBD 方法的稳定性指示 RP-HPLC 法同时估算用于治疗神经痛的普瑞巴林和度洛西汀","authors":"Vaishnavi A. Gosavi, Mahesh M. Deshpande, Gauri D. Ghangale, Machindra J. Chavan","doi":"10.2174/0115734129321062240906070516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: A novel stability indicating RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine by using the QBD approach. Method: To determine the optimal parameters for the duloxetine and pregabalin study, we used Design Expert version 13.0 in this work. The mobile phase consisted of 0.8 ml/min of methanol: water (80:20, v/v) with o-phosphoric acid-adjusted pH 3.A 250 mm × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm particle size Cosmosil C18 column was used. The UV-3000-M detector was used to detect at 218 nm. Results: Duloxetine's retention time was 7.153 ±0.1 min, whereas Pregabalin's was 4.481±0.1 min. The ICH parameters like linearity, accuracy, robustness, ruggedness, LOD and LOQ, and system suitability were determined. Likewise, the tailing factors were found to be 1.27 and 1.26, while the theoretical plates of duloxetine and pregabalin were found to be 8313 and 8549, respectively. The recovery study shows the results (99.37–99.84% for pregabalin and 99.03–99.74% for duloxetine), and the precision was obtained with a %RSD of less than 2%. The result of the assay was 99.92 % for pregabalin and 99.39% for duloxetine. The developed method was used for the forced degradation study. The Box-Behnken design experiment using Design Expert 13.0 was adopted for the QBD approach. Conclusion: All the values obtained for different parameters were within the acceptable range of ICH. The developed method can be routinely used for the simultaneous estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine by using the QBD approach.","PeriodicalId":10889,"journal":{"name":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous Estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine Used to Treat Nerve Pain by Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Using the QBD Approach\",\"authors\":\"Vaishnavi A. Gosavi, Mahesh M. Deshpande, Gauri D. Ghangale, Machindra J. Chavan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115734129321062240906070516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: A novel stability indicating RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine by using the QBD approach. Method: To determine the optimal parameters for the duloxetine and pregabalin study, we used Design Expert version 13.0 in this work. The mobile phase consisted of 0.8 ml/min of methanol: water (80:20, v/v) with o-phosphoric acid-adjusted pH 3.A 250 mm × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm particle size Cosmosil C18 column was used. The UV-3000-M detector was used to detect at 218 nm. Results: Duloxetine's retention time was 7.153 ±0.1 min, whereas Pregabalin's was 4.481±0.1 min. The ICH parameters like linearity, accuracy, robustness, ruggedness, LOD and LOQ, and system suitability were determined. Likewise, the tailing factors were found to be 1.27 and 1.26, while the theoretical plates of duloxetine and pregabalin were found to be 8313 and 8549, respectively. The recovery study shows the results (99.37–99.84% for pregabalin and 99.03–99.74% for duloxetine), and the precision was obtained with a %RSD of less than 2%. The result of the assay was 99.92 % for pregabalin and 99.39% for duloxetine. The developed method was used for the forced degradation study. The Box-Behnken design experiment using Design Expert 13.0 was adopted for the QBD approach. Conclusion: All the values obtained for different parameters were within the acceptable range of ICH. The developed method can be routinely used for the simultaneous estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine by using the QBD approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734129321062240906070516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734129321062240906070516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用 QBD 方法开发并验证了一种新型稳定性指示 RP-HPLC 方法,用于同时估算普瑞巴林和度洛西汀。方法:为了确定度洛西汀和普瑞巴林研究的最佳参数,我们在这项工作中使用了 Design Expert 13.0 版。采用内径为 250 mm × 4.6 mm、粒径为 5 μm 的 Cosmosil C18 色谱柱,流动相为甲醇:水(80:20,v/v),pH 值为 3 的邻磷酸,流速为 0.8 ml/min。UV-3000-M 检测器的检测波长为 218 nm。检测结果度洛西汀的保留时间为 7.153±0.1 分钟,而普瑞巴林的保留时间为 4.481±0.1 分钟。测定了线性、准确度、稳健性、坚固性、LOD 和 LOQ 以及系统适用性等 ICH 参数。同样,尾随因子分别为 1.27 和 1.26,度洛西汀和普瑞巴林的理论平板分别为 8313 和 8549。回收率研究结果显示(普瑞巴林的回收率为 99.37%-99.84%,度洛西汀的回收率为 99.03%-99.74%),精密度为%RSD 小于 2%。普瑞巴林的检测结果为 99.92%,度洛西汀的检测结果为 99.39%。所开发的方法被用于强制降解研究。QBD 方法采用了 Design Expert 13.0 的箱-贝肯设计实验。结论所获得的不同参数值均在 ICH 规定的可接受范围内。所开发的方法可通过 QBD 方法常规用于普瑞巴林和度洛西汀的同时测定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simultaneous Estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine Used to Treat Nerve Pain by Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Using the QBD Approach
Objective: A novel stability indicating RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine by using the QBD approach. Method: To determine the optimal parameters for the duloxetine and pregabalin study, we used Design Expert version 13.0 in this work. The mobile phase consisted of 0.8 ml/min of methanol: water (80:20, v/v) with o-phosphoric acid-adjusted pH 3.A 250 mm × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm particle size Cosmosil C18 column was used. The UV-3000-M detector was used to detect at 218 nm. Results: Duloxetine's retention time was 7.153 ±0.1 min, whereas Pregabalin's was 4.481±0.1 min. The ICH parameters like linearity, accuracy, robustness, ruggedness, LOD and LOQ, and system suitability were determined. Likewise, the tailing factors were found to be 1.27 and 1.26, while the theoretical plates of duloxetine and pregabalin were found to be 8313 and 8549, respectively. The recovery study shows the results (99.37–99.84% for pregabalin and 99.03–99.74% for duloxetine), and the precision was obtained with a %RSD of less than 2%. The result of the assay was 99.92 % for pregabalin and 99.39% for duloxetine. The developed method was used for the forced degradation study. The Box-Behnken design experiment using Design Expert 13.0 was adopted for the QBD approach. Conclusion: All the values obtained for different parameters were within the acceptable range of ICH. The developed method can be routinely used for the simultaneous estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine by using the QBD approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Current Pharmaceutical Analysis publishes expert reviews and original research articles on all the most recent advances in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. All aspects of the field are represented including drug analysis, analytical methodology and instrumentation. The journal is essential to all involved in pharmaceutical, biochemical and clinical analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信