创伤和损伤严重程度评分与损伤严重程度评分在预测脑外伤儿童高价值护理结果方面的比较分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Foad Kazemi,Jiaqi Liu,Isam W Nasr,Shenandoah Robinson,Alan R Cohen
{"title":"创伤和损伤严重程度评分与损伤严重程度评分在预测脑外伤儿童高价值护理结果方面的比较分析。","authors":"Foad Kazemi,Jiaqi Liu,Isam W Nasr,Shenandoah Robinson,Alan R Cohen","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.peds24309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nPredicting high-value care outcomes is crucial in managing pediatric traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), where timely and accurate prognostication can significantly influence treatment decisions and resource allocation. This study aimed to enhance understanding of how well scoring systems such as the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) can forecast high-value care outcomes. Furthermore, the authors compared the predictive power of TRISS with the routinely used Injury Severity Score (ISS).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe authors performed a retrospective review of their institutional database from June 2016 to June 2023 to identify cases of TBI based on a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention framework. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) was defined as a hospital stay falling into the upper quartile of the overall cohort. Discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, acute care hospital, or foster care or death was defined as a nonroutine discharge disposition. Emergency department (ED) transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) or operating room (OR) was defined as a proxy for severity of injuries. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the association between ISS, TRISS, and high-value care outcomes. The DeLong test was used to assess the differences between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThis study included 2705 patients with a mean age ± SD of 7.28 ± 5.46 years (63% male). In the overall cohort, 28% experienced prolonged LOS, 7% had a nonroutine discharge disposition from the hospital, and 23% were transferred to the ICU/OR from the ED. In multivariate regression models, both TRISS and ISS were correlated with higher odds of prolonged LOS, nonroutine discharge disposition, and transfer to the ICU/OR from the ED (all p < 0.001). TRISS had a significantly greater AUROC than ISS for nonroutine discharge disposition (0.883 vs 0.849, p < 0.001) and transfer to the ICU/OR (0.898 vs 0.887, p = 0.045), but this result was not significant for prolonged LOS (0.873 vs 0.880, p = 0.140).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nTRISS and ISS are effective tools for predicting high-value care outcomes in pediatric TBI. Utilizing these resources can assist healthcare providers in making informed, risk-adjusted predictions.","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting high-value care outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury.\",\"authors\":\"Foad Kazemi,Jiaqi Liu,Isam W Nasr,Shenandoah Robinson,Alan R Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.8.peds24309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nPredicting high-value care outcomes is crucial in managing pediatric traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), where timely and accurate prognostication can significantly influence treatment decisions and resource allocation. This study aimed to enhance understanding of how well scoring systems such as the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) can forecast high-value care outcomes. Furthermore, the authors compared the predictive power of TRISS with the routinely used Injury Severity Score (ISS).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe authors performed a retrospective review of their institutional database from June 2016 to June 2023 to identify cases of TBI based on a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention framework. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) was defined as a hospital stay falling into the upper quartile of the overall cohort. Discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, acute care hospital, or foster care or death was defined as a nonroutine discharge disposition. Emergency department (ED) transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) or operating room (OR) was defined as a proxy for severity of injuries. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the association between ISS, TRISS, and high-value care outcomes. The DeLong test was used to assess the differences between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThis study included 2705 patients with a mean age ± SD of 7.28 ± 5.46 years (63% male). In the overall cohort, 28% experienced prolonged LOS, 7% had a nonroutine discharge disposition from the hospital, and 23% were transferred to the ICU/OR from the ED. In multivariate regression models, both TRISS and ISS were correlated with higher odds of prolonged LOS, nonroutine discharge disposition, and transfer to the ICU/OR from the ED (all p < 0.001). TRISS had a significantly greater AUROC than ISS for nonroutine discharge disposition (0.883 vs 0.849, p < 0.001) and transfer to the ICU/OR (0.898 vs 0.887, p = 0.045), but this result was not significant for prolonged LOS (0.873 vs 0.880, p = 0.140).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nTRISS and ISS are effective tools for predicting high-value care outcomes in pediatric TBI. Utilizing these resources can assist healthcare providers in making informed, risk-adjusted predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.peds24309\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.peds24309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的预测高价值护理结果对于儿科创伤性脑损伤(TBIs)的管理至关重要,及时准确的预后可极大地影响治疗决策和资源分配。本研究旨在进一步了解创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)等评分系统对高价值护理结果的预测能力。此外,作者还将 TRISS 的预测能力与常规使用的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)进行了比较。方法作者对其机构数据库从 2016 年 6 月到 2023 年 6 月的数据进行了回顾性审查,以根据修改后的美国疾病控制和预防中心框架确定创伤和损伤病例。住院时间延长(LOS)被定义为住院时间处于总体队列的上四分位数。出院至住院康复机构、急症护理医院或寄养机构或死亡被定义为非例行出院处置。急诊科(ED)转入重症监护室(ICU)或手术室(OR)被定义为受伤严重程度的替代指标。多变量逻辑回归模型用于探讨 ISS、TRISS 和高价值护理结果之间的关联。结果本研究共纳入 2705 名患者,平均年龄(± SD)为 7.28±5.46 岁(63% 为男性)。在整个队列中,28%的患者经历了长期住院,7%的患者有非正常出院处置,23%的患者从急诊室转入重症监护室/手术室。在多变量回归模型中,TRISS 和 ISS 均与较高的 LOS 延长、非正常出院处置和从急诊室转入 ICU/OR 的几率相关(均 p <0.001)。在非正常出院处置(0.883 vs 0.849,p < 0.001)和转入 ICU/OR (0.898 vs 0.887,p = 0.045)方面,TRISS 的 AUROC 明显高于 ISS,但在延长 LOS(0.873 vs 0.880,p = 0.140)方面,这一结果并不显著。利用这些资源可以帮助医疗服务提供者做出明智的风险调整预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting high-value care outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury.
OBJECTIVE Predicting high-value care outcomes is crucial in managing pediatric traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), where timely and accurate prognostication can significantly influence treatment decisions and resource allocation. This study aimed to enhance understanding of how well scoring systems such as the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) can forecast high-value care outcomes. Furthermore, the authors compared the predictive power of TRISS with the routinely used Injury Severity Score (ISS). METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of their institutional database from June 2016 to June 2023 to identify cases of TBI based on a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention framework. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) was defined as a hospital stay falling into the upper quartile of the overall cohort. Discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility, acute care hospital, or foster care or death was defined as a nonroutine discharge disposition. Emergency department (ED) transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) or operating room (OR) was defined as a proxy for severity of injuries. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the association between ISS, TRISS, and high-value care outcomes. The DeLong test was used to assess the differences between the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs). RESULTS This study included 2705 patients with a mean age ± SD of 7.28 ± 5.46 years (63% male). In the overall cohort, 28% experienced prolonged LOS, 7% had a nonroutine discharge disposition from the hospital, and 23% were transferred to the ICU/OR from the ED. In multivariate regression models, both TRISS and ISS were correlated with higher odds of prolonged LOS, nonroutine discharge disposition, and transfer to the ICU/OR from the ED (all p < 0.001). TRISS had a significantly greater AUROC than ISS for nonroutine discharge disposition (0.883 vs 0.849, p < 0.001) and transfer to the ICU/OR (0.898 vs 0.887, p = 0.045), but this result was not significant for prolonged LOS (0.873 vs 0.880, p = 0.140). CONCLUSIONS TRISS and ISS are effective tools for predicting high-value care outcomes in pediatric TBI. Utilizing these resources can assist healthcare providers in making informed, risk-adjusted predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信