Taeho Jung, Eric A. Carmona, Yueming Song, Paul Albertus
{"title":"锂金属镀层驱动的固体电解质断裂模型需要电化学机械耦合","authors":"Taeho Jung, Eric A. Carmona, Yueming Song, Paul Albertus","doi":"10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A common failure mode for solid-state lithium-metal batteries is solid-electrolyte fracture during lithium plating, but fracture initiation is complicated to diagnose. Here, an electrochemically and mechanically coupled steady-state lithium-plating model is implemented numerically to study fracture initiation at the lithium/solid-electrolyte interface. The solid electrolyte is treated as a linear elastic solid, while lithium is modeled as a Newtonian fluid. An electrochemical connection between the two phases is made via the stress-modified Butler-Volmer equation at the Gaussian-curved interface, where lithium protrudes into the solid electrolyte. The model simulations demonstrate that the couplings result in significantly different electrochemical and mechanical behaviors from those predicted by the model without the couplings. The J-integrals—an indicator of fracture—of the coupled and uncoupled models are six orders of magnitude apart. The coupled model supports a shear-traction-driven fracture concentrated at the asperity base instead of the commonly attributed pressure-driven fracture at the asperity tip. Finally, our sensitivity analysis reveals that lithium pseudo-viscosity and asperity geometry are important parameters determining fracture initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9703,"journal":{"name":"Cell Reports Physical Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solid-electrolyte fracture models driven by lithium metal plating require electrochemical mechanical couplings\",\"authors\":\"Taeho Jung, Eric A. Carmona, Yueming Song, Paul Albertus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A common failure mode for solid-state lithium-metal batteries is solid-electrolyte fracture during lithium plating, but fracture initiation is complicated to diagnose. Here, an electrochemically and mechanically coupled steady-state lithium-plating model is implemented numerically to study fracture initiation at the lithium/solid-electrolyte interface. The solid electrolyte is treated as a linear elastic solid, while lithium is modeled as a Newtonian fluid. An electrochemical connection between the two phases is made via the stress-modified Butler-Volmer equation at the Gaussian-curved interface, where lithium protrudes into the solid electrolyte. The model simulations demonstrate that the couplings result in significantly different electrochemical and mechanical behaviors from those predicted by the model without the couplings. The J-integrals—an indicator of fracture—of the coupled and uncoupled models are six orders of magnitude apart. The coupled model supports a shear-traction-driven fracture concentrated at the asperity base instead of the commonly attributed pressure-driven fracture at the asperity tip. Finally, our sensitivity analysis reveals that lithium pseudo-viscosity and asperity geometry are important parameters determining fracture initiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Reports Physical Science\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Reports Physical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Reports Physical Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Solid-electrolyte fracture models driven by lithium metal plating require electrochemical mechanical couplings
A common failure mode for solid-state lithium-metal batteries is solid-electrolyte fracture during lithium plating, but fracture initiation is complicated to diagnose. Here, an electrochemically and mechanically coupled steady-state lithium-plating model is implemented numerically to study fracture initiation at the lithium/solid-electrolyte interface. The solid electrolyte is treated as a linear elastic solid, while lithium is modeled as a Newtonian fluid. An electrochemical connection between the two phases is made via the stress-modified Butler-Volmer equation at the Gaussian-curved interface, where lithium protrudes into the solid electrolyte. The model simulations demonstrate that the couplings result in significantly different electrochemical and mechanical behaviors from those predicted by the model without the couplings. The J-integrals—an indicator of fracture—of the coupled and uncoupled models are six orders of magnitude apart. The coupled model supports a shear-traction-driven fracture concentrated at the asperity base instead of the commonly attributed pressure-driven fracture at the asperity tip. Finally, our sensitivity analysis reveals that lithium pseudo-viscosity and asperity geometry are important parameters determining fracture initiation.
期刊介绍:
Cell Reports Physical Science, a premium open-access journal from Cell Press, features high-quality, cutting-edge research spanning the physical sciences. It serves as an open forum fostering collaboration among physical scientists while championing open science principles. Published works must signify significant advancements in fundamental insight or technological applications within fields such as chemistry, physics, materials science, energy science, engineering, and related interdisciplinary studies. In addition to longer articles, the journal considers impactful short-form reports and short reviews covering recent literature in emerging fields. Continually adapting to the evolving open science landscape, the journal reviews its policies to align with community consensus and best practices.