报告未经同意的亲密媒体:深度伪造的审计研究

Li Qiwei, Shihui Zhang, Andrew Timothy Kasper, Joshua Ashkinaze, Asia A. Eaton, Sarita Schoenebeck, Eric Gilbert
{"title":"报告未经同意的亲密媒体:深度伪造的审计研究","authors":"Li Qiwei, Shihui Zhang, Andrew Timothy Kasper, Joshua Ashkinaze, Asia A. Eaton, Sarita Schoenebeck, Eric Gilbert","doi":"arxiv-2409.12138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-consensual intimate media (NCIM) inflicts significant harm. Currently,\nvictim-survivors can use two mechanisms to report NCIM - as a non-consensual\nnudity violation or as copyright infringement. We conducted an audit study of\ntakedown speed of NCIM reported to X (formerly Twitter) of both mechanisms. We\nuploaded 50 AI-generated nude images and reported half under X's\n\"non-consensual nudity\" reporting mechanism and half under its \"copyright\ninfringement\" mechanism. The copyright condition resulted in successful image\nremoval within 25 hours for all images (100% removal rate), while\nnon-consensual nudity reports resulted in no image removal for over three weeks\n(0% removal rate). We stress the need for targeted legislation to regulate NCIM\nremoval online. We also discuss ethical considerations for auditing NCIM on\nsocial platforms.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting Non-Consensual Intimate Media: An Audit Study of Deepfakes\",\"authors\":\"Li Qiwei, Shihui Zhang, Andrew Timothy Kasper, Joshua Ashkinaze, Asia A. Eaton, Sarita Schoenebeck, Eric Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.12138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-consensual intimate media (NCIM) inflicts significant harm. Currently,\\nvictim-survivors can use two mechanisms to report NCIM - as a non-consensual\\nnudity violation or as copyright infringement. We conducted an audit study of\\ntakedown speed of NCIM reported to X (formerly Twitter) of both mechanisms. We\\nuploaded 50 AI-generated nude images and reported half under X's\\n\\\"non-consensual nudity\\\" reporting mechanism and half under its \\\"copyright\\ninfringement\\\" mechanism. The copyright condition resulted in successful image\\nremoval within 25 hours for all images (100% removal rate), while\\nnon-consensual nudity reports resulted in no image removal for over three weeks\\n(0% removal rate). We stress the need for targeted legislation to regulate NCIM\\nremoval online. We also discuss ethical considerations for auditing NCIM on\\nsocial platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.12138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.12138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未经同意的亲密媒体(NCIM)会造成重大伤害。目前,受害者-幸存者可以使用两种机制报告非自愿亲密媒体--作为非自愿裸露侵犯或作为版权侵犯。我们对通过这两种机制向 X(前 Twitter)报告的 NCIM 的删除速度进行了审计研究。我们上传了 50 张人工智能生成的裸体图片,一半按照 X 的 "未经同意的裸体 "报告机制进行报告,一半按照其 "侵犯版权 "机制进行报告。版权条件导致所有图像在 25 小时内被成功删除(删除率为 100%),而非自愿裸体报告导致图像在三周内未被删除(删除率为 0%)。我们强调有必要制定有针对性的立法来规范网络上的 NCIM 删除行为。我们还讨论了审核社交平台上的非自愿裸体信息的道德考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reporting Non-Consensual Intimate Media: An Audit Study of Deepfakes
Non-consensual intimate media (NCIM) inflicts significant harm. Currently, victim-survivors can use two mechanisms to report NCIM - as a non-consensual nudity violation or as copyright infringement. We conducted an audit study of takedown speed of NCIM reported to X (formerly Twitter) of both mechanisms. We uploaded 50 AI-generated nude images and reported half under X's "non-consensual nudity" reporting mechanism and half under its "copyright infringement" mechanism. The copyright condition resulted in successful image removal within 25 hours for all images (100% removal rate), while non-consensual nudity reports resulted in no image removal for over three weeks (0% removal rate). We stress the need for targeted legislation to regulate NCIM removal online. We also discuss ethical considerations for auditing NCIM on social platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信