人工智能安全机构在促进制定人工智能前沿安全国际标准方面的作用

Kristina Fort
{"title":"人工智能安全机构在促进制定人工智能前沿安全国际标准方面的作用","authors":"Kristina Fort","doi":"arxiv-2409.11314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International standards are crucial for ensuring that frontier AI systems are\ndeveloped and deployed safely around the world. Since the AI Safety Institutes\n(AISIs) possess in-house technical expertise, mandate for international\nengagement, and convening power in the national AI ecosystem while being a\ngovernment institution, we argue that they are particularly well-positioned to\ncontribute to the international standard-setting processes for AI safety. In\nthis paper, we propose and evaluate three models for AISI involvement: 1. Seoul\nDeclaration Signatories, 2. US (and other Seoul Declaration Signatories) and\nChina, and 3. Globally Inclusive. Leveraging their diverse strengths, these\nmodels are not mutually exclusive. Rather, they offer a multi-track system\nsolution in which the central role of AISIs guarantees coherence among the\ndifferent tracks and consistency in their AI safety focus.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of AI Safety Institutes in Contributing to International Standards for Frontier AI Safety\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Fort\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International standards are crucial for ensuring that frontier AI systems are\\ndeveloped and deployed safely around the world. Since the AI Safety Institutes\\n(AISIs) possess in-house technical expertise, mandate for international\\nengagement, and convening power in the national AI ecosystem while being a\\ngovernment institution, we argue that they are particularly well-positioned to\\ncontribute to the international standard-setting processes for AI safety. In\\nthis paper, we propose and evaluate three models for AISI involvement: 1. Seoul\\nDeclaration Signatories, 2. US (and other Seoul Declaration Signatories) and\\nChina, and 3. Globally Inclusive. Leveraging their diverse strengths, these\\nmodels are not mutually exclusive. Rather, they offer a multi-track system\\nsolution in which the central role of AISIs guarantees coherence among the\\ndifferent tracks and consistency in their AI safety focus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际标准对于确保前沿人工智能系统在全球安全开发和部署至关重要。由于人工智能安全研究所(AISI)拥有内部技术专长、国际参与授权以及在国家人工智能生态系统中的号召力,同时又是政府机构,因此我们认为它们特别适合为人工智能安全的国际标准制定过程做出贡献。在本文中,我们提出并评估了 AISI 参与的三种模式:1.首尔宣言》签署国;2.美国(及其他《首尔宣言》签署国)和中国;3.全球包容性。全球包容。利用各自不同的优势,这些模式并非相互排斥。相反,它们提供了一个多轨系统解决方案,其中,机构间创新倡议的核心作用保证了不同轨道之间的一致性及其人工智能安全重点的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of AI Safety Institutes in Contributing to International Standards for Frontier AI Safety
International standards are crucial for ensuring that frontier AI systems are developed and deployed safely around the world. Since the AI Safety Institutes (AISIs) possess in-house technical expertise, mandate for international engagement, and convening power in the national AI ecosystem while being a government institution, we argue that they are particularly well-positioned to contribute to the international standard-setting processes for AI safety. In this paper, we propose and evaluate three models for AISI involvement: 1. Seoul Declaration Signatories, 2. US (and other Seoul Declaration Signatories) and China, and 3. Globally Inclusive. Leveraging their diverse strengths, these models are not mutually exclusive. Rather, they offer a multi-track system solution in which the central role of AISIs guarantees coherence among the different tracks and consistency in their AI safety focus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信