Andrew Conway, Michelle Blom, Alexander Ek, Peter J. Stuckey, Vanessa J. Teague, Damjan Vukcevic
{"title":"澳大利亚 STV 选举计票的失常特性","authors":"Andrew Conway, Michelle Blom, Alexander Ek, Peter J. Stuckey, Vanessa J. Teague, Damjan Vukcevic","doi":"arxiv-2409.11627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single Transferable Vote (STV) counting, used in several jurisdictions in\nAustralia, is a system for choosing multiple election winners given voters'\npreferences over candidates. There are a variety of different versions of STV\nlegislated and/or applied across Australia. This paper shows some of the\nunintuitive properties of some of these systems.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Idiosyncratic properties of Australian STV election counting\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Conway, Michelle Blom, Alexander Ek, Peter J. Stuckey, Vanessa J. Teague, Damjan Vukcevic\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single Transferable Vote (STV) counting, used in several jurisdictions in\\nAustralia, is a system for choosing multiple election winners given voters'\\npreferences over candidates. There are a variety of different versions of STV\\nlegislated and/or applied across Australia. This paper shows some of the\\nunintuitive properties of some of these systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Idiosyncratic properties of Australian STV election counting
Single Transferable Vote (STV) counting, used in several jurisdictions in
Australia, is a system for choosing multiple election winners given voters'
preferences over candidates. There are a variety of different versions of STV
legislated and/or applied across Australia. This paper shows some of the
unintuitive properties of some of these systems.