Dineth Foneska,Sayan Biswas,Hamza Ahmed,Ved Sarkar,Joshua MacArthur,K Joshi George
{"title":"放射学压迫程度如何预测马尾综合征?一家国家三级医疗中心的回顾性研究","authors":"Dineth Foneska,Sayan Biswas,Hamza Ahmed,Ved Sarkar,Joshua MacArthur,K Joshi George","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nCauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is diagnosed both clinically and radiologically. However, it's unclear if a specific degree of cauda equina compression (CEC) on imaging can confirm the diagnosis. This study aimed to identify an optimal percentage of prolapse to canal ratio (PCR) on MRI that correlates with CEC, facilitating reliable decision-making for CES symptoms.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA single-center retrospective case series analysis was conducted from 2020 to 2021. Sixty-one patients who underwent emergency lumbar discectomy within 48 hours of presentation were included, divided into a CES group and a disc prolapse (DP) group. CES cases were identified using ICD-10 code G83.4. PCR was calculated by dividing the width of the disc herniation by the total width of the spinal canal at the level of the herniation on single mid-sagittal T2 MRI scans, using the IC Measure software on Windows.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nCES most frequently occurred at the L4/5 level (37/61). The median PCR in CES cases was 76.19% (66.67 - 85.71), significantly higher than in DP cases, 48.08% (31.33 - 55.56) (p<0.001). A PCR threshold of 40% maximized sensitivity at 100% but had a specificity of 45%. Conversely, a threshold of 75% maximized specificity at 100% with a sensitivity of 50%. The optimal PCR, determined by the Youden index, was 66%, yielding a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 97%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.923.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSimple radiological measurements of PCR can potentially triage CES patients and guide their management. Future studies should correlate PCR with clinical signs and symptoms for a comprehensive assessment.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Degree of Radiological Compression Predicts Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Retrospective Study at a National Tertiary Centre.\",\"authors\":\"Dineth Foneska,Sayan Biswas,Hamza Ahmed,Ved Sarkar,Joshua MacArthur,K Joshi George\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nCauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is diagnosed both clinically and radiologically. However, it's unclear if a specific degree of cauda equina compression (CEC) on imaging can confirm the diagnosis. This study aimed to identify an optimal percentage of prolapse to canal ratio (PCR) on MRI that correlates with CEC, facilitating reliable decision-making for CES symptoms.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA single-center retrospective case series analysis was conducted from 2020 to 2021. Sixty-one patients who underwent emergency lumbar discectomy within 48 hours of presentation were included, divided into a CES group and a disc prolapse (DP) group. CES cases were identified using ICD-10 code G83.4. PCR was calculated by dividing the width of the disc herniation by the total width of the spinal canal at the level of the herniation on single mid-sagittal T2 MRI scans, using the IC Measure software on Windows.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nCES most frequently occurred at the L4/5 level (37/61). The median PCR in CES cases was 76.19% (66.67 - 85.71), significantly higher than in DP cases, 48.08% (31.33 - 55.56) (p<0.001). A PCR threshold of 40% maximized sensitivity at 100% but had a specificity of 45%. Conversely, a threshold of 75% maximized specificity at 100% with a sensitivity of 50%. The optimal PCR, determined by the Youden index, was 66%, yielding a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 97%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.923.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nSimple radiological measurements of PCR can potentially triage CES patients and guide their management. Future studies should correlate PCR with clinical signs and symptoms for a comprehensive assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Degree of Radiological Compression Predicts Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Retrospective Study at a National Tertiary Centre.
OBJECTIVE
Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is diagnosed both clinically and radiologically. However, it's unclear if a specific degree of cauda equina compression (CEC) on imaging can confirm the diagnosis. This study aimed to identify an optimal percentage of prolapse to canal ratio (PCR) on MRI that correlates with CEC, facilitating reliable decision-making for CES symptoms.
METHODS
A single-center retrospective case series analysis was conducted from 2020 to 2021. Sixty-one patients who underwent emergency lumbar discectomy within 48 hours of presentation were included, divided into a CES group and a disc prolapse (DP) group. CES cases were identified using ICD-10 code G83.4. PCR was calculated by dividing the width of the disc herniation by the total width of the spinal canal at the level of the herniation on single mid-sagittal T2 MRI scans, using the IC Measure software on Windows.
RESULTS
CES most frequently occurred at the L4/5 level (37/61). The median PCR in CES cases was 76.19% (66.67 - 85.71), significantly higher than in DP cases, 48.08% (31.33 - 55.56) (p<0.001). A PCR threshold of 40% maximized sensitivity at 100% but had a specificity of 45%. Conversely, a threshold of 75% maximized specificity at 100% with a sensitivity of 50%. The optimal PCR, determined by the Youden index, was 66%, yielding a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 97%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.923.
CONCLUSIONS
Simple radiological measurements of PCR can potentially triage CES patients and guide their management. Future studies should correlate PCR with clinical signs and symptoms for a comprehensive assessment.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.