Karine Letícia da Silva, Cleysson Crovador, Rodrigo Stanislawczuk, Abraham Lincoln Calixto, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio
{"title":"使用 37% 过氧化卡巴酰胺与 35% 过氧化氢的诊所牙科漂白:随机双盲临床试验","authors":"Karine Letícia da Silva, Cleysson Crovador, Rodrigo Stanislawczuk, Abraham Lincoln Calixto, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveCompare the tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy (BE) of in‐office dental bleaching performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) or 37% carbamide peroxide (CP).Materials and MethodsSixty‐six participants were randomly divided into two groups according to the bleaching gel applied to the right hemiarch: 35% HP, or 37% CP. TS was recorded immediately after, up to 1, 24, and 48 h after bleaching, using the VAS and NRS scales. BE was assessed before bleaching and 1 month after using color guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>ab</jats:italic></jats:sub>, Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>00</jats:sub>, and ΔWI<jats:sub><jats:italic>D</jats:italic></jats:sub>). TS was assessed using McNemar's and paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test (VAS) or Wilcoxon signed rank (NRS). The paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test was used to analyze BE (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> = 0.05).ResultsTS risk and intensity were lower for the 37% CP (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003 and <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.005). Despite significant differences between the groups after 1 month (ΔSGU and Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>00</jats:sub>; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05), the color measurements of both groups exceeded the 50%:50% perceptibility/acceptability threshold.ConclusionIn‐office dental bleaching using 37% CP resulted in reduced risk and TS intensity, without prejudice to the BE.Clinical RelevanceThe use of 37% CP for in‐office dental bleaching could decrease TS risk and intensity without affecting BE.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: RBR‐683qhf","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In‐Office Dental Bleaching Using 37% Carbamide Peroxide Versus 35% Hydrogen Peroxide: A Randomized, Double‐Blind Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Karine Letícia da Silva, Cleysson Crovador, Rodrigo Stanislawczuk, Abraham Lincoln Calixto, Alessandra Reis, Alessandro D. Loguercio\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveCompare the tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy (BE) of in‐office dental bleaching performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) or 37% carbamide peroxide (CP).Materials and MethodsSixty‐six participants were randomly divided into two groups according to the bleaching gel applied to the right hemiarch: 35% HP, or 37% CP. TS was recorded immediately after, up to 1, 24, and 48 h after bleaching, using the VAS and NRS scales. BE was assessed before bleaching and 1 month after using color guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub><jats:italic>ab</jats:italic></jats:sub>, Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>00</jats:sub>, and ΔWI<jats:sub><jats:italic>D</jats:italic></jats:sub>). TS was assessed using McNemar's and paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test (VAS) or Wilcoxon signed rank (NRS). The paired <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>‐test was used to analyze BE (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> = 0.05).ResultsTS risk and intensity were lower for the 37% CP (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003 and <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.005). Despite significant differences between the groups after 1 month (ΔSGU and Δ<jats:italic>E</jats:italic><jats:sub>00</jats:sub>; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05), the color measurements of both groups exceeded the 50%:50% perceptibility/acceptability threshold.ConclusionIn‐office dental bleaching using 37% CP resulted in reduced risk and TS intensity, without prejudice to the BE.Clinical RelevanceThe use of 37% CP for in‐office dental bleaching could decrease TS risk and intensity without affecting BE.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: RBR‐683qhf\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
比较使用 35% 过氧化氢(HP)或 37% 过氧化卡巴酰胺(CP)进行诊室牙齿漂白的牙齿敏感性(TS)和漂白效果(BE):35% HP 或 37% CP。使用 VAS 和 NRS 量表记录漂白后即刻、1 小时、24 小时和 48 小时内的 TS。在漂白前和漂白后 1 个月,使用色导单位(ΔSGUs)和分光光度计(ΔEab、ΔE00 和 ΔWID)对 BE 进行评估。TS 采用 McNemar 检验和配对 t 检验(VAS)或 Wilcoxon 符号秩(NRS)进行评估。采用配对 t 检验分析 BE(α = 0.05)。结果 37% CP 的 TS 风险和强度较低(p = 0.003 和 p <0.005)。尽管 1 个月后两组之间存在明显差异(ΔSGU 和 ΔE00;p < 0.05),但两组的颜色测量值都超过了 50%:50%的可感知性/可接受性阈值:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:RBR-683qhf
In‐Office Dental Bleaching Using 37% Carbamide Peroxide Versus 35% Hydrogen Peroxide: A Randomized, Double‐Blind Clinical Trial
ObjectiveCompare the tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy (BE) of in‐office dental bleaching performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) or 37% carbamide peroxide (CP).Materials and MethodsSixty‐six participants were randomly divided into two groups according to the bleaching gel applied to the right hemiarch: 35% HP, or 37% CP. TS was recorded immediately after, up to 1, 24, and 48 h after bleaching, using the VAS and NRS scales. BE was assessed before bleaching and 1 month after using color guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID). TS was assessed using McNemar's and paired t‐test (VAS) or Wilcoxon signed rank (NRS). The paired t‐test was used to analyze BE (α = 0.05).ResultsTS risk and intensity were lower for the 37% CP (p = 0.003 and p < 0.005). Despite significant differences between the groups after 1 month (ΔSGU and ΔE00; p < 0.05), the color measurements of both groups exceeded the 50%:50% perceptibility/acceptability threshold.ConclusionIn‐office dental bleaching using 37% CP resulted in reduced risk and TS intensity, without prejudice to the BE.Clinical RelevanceThe use of 37% CP for in‐office dental bleaching could decrease TS risk and intensity without affecting BE.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: RBR‐683qhf
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics