光活化核黄素掺杂羟基磷灰石纳米球渗入正畸粘合剂中

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Salem Almoammar, Abdullah A. Alnazeh, Muhammad Abdullah Kamran, Mohammed Mohsen Al Jearah, Muhammad Qasim, Anshad M. Abdulla
{"title":"光活化核黄素掺杂羟基磷灰石纳米球渗入正畸粘合剂中","authors":"Salem Almoammar, Abdullah A. Alnazeh, Muhammad Abdullah Kamran, Mohammed Mohsen Al Jearah, Muhammad Qasim, Anshad M. Abdulla","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:label/>To assess micro‐tensile bond strength (μTBS), degree of conversion (DC), microleakage (ML) antibacterial efficacy, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of orthodontic brackets to enamel with different concentrations of photoactivated riboflavin‐doped hydroxyapatite (HA) nanospheres (NS) (0%,1%,5% and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF alone in orthodontic adhesive. Samples were included on the predefined inclusion criteria and positioned up to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Hydroxy apatite nanospheres (HANS) commercially bought were doped with RF. Surface characterization of HANS and RF‐doped HANS were assessed along with EDX analysis. Samples were grouped based on experimental orthodontic adhesive modification. Group 1: Transbond XT no modification, Group 2: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF, Group 3: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 1% HANS, Group 4: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt % RF‐doped 5% HANS and Group 5: Experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HANS. Brackets were placed based on different adhesive modifications and samples underwent thermocycling. Samples were evaluated for μTBS, DC, and ML. The type of failure was assessed using ARI. Adhesive modified and un‐modified in four different concentrations (0%, 1%, 5%, and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF only were used to test efficacy against <jats:italic>Streptococcus mutans</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic>). The survival rate of <jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic> and ML was determined using the Kruskal–Wallis Test. For the analysis of μTBS, ANOVA was employed, followed by a post‐hoc Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test. The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only. The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HANS. Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of <jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic> and DC. Photoactivated RF‐doped HANS in 1% and 0.5 wt% Riboflavin alone in orthodontic adhesive for metallic bracket bonding improved micro tensile bond strength, ML, DC, and antibacterial scores.Research Highlights<jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HA‐NS.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of <jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic> and DC</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photoactivated riboflavin‐doped hydroxy apatite nanospheres infiltered in orthodontic adhesives\",\"authors\":\"Salem Almoammar, Abdullah A. Alnazeh, Muhammad Abdullah Kamran, Mohammed Mohsen Al Jearah, Muhammad Qasim, Anshad M. Abdulla\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jemt.24687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:label/>To assess micro‐tensile bond strength (μTBS), degree of conversion (DC), microleakage (ML) antibacterial efficacy, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of orthodontic brackets to enamel with different concentrations of photoactivated riboflavin‐doped hydroxyapatite (HA) nanospheres (NS) (0%,1%,5% and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF alone in orthodontic adhesive. Samples were included on the predefined inclusion criteria and positioned up to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Hydroxy apatite nanospheres (HANS) commercially bought were doped with RF. Surface characterization of HANS and RF‐doped HANS were assessed along with EDX analysis. Samples were grouped based on experimental orthodontic adhesive modification. Group 1: Transbond XT no modification, Group 2: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF, Group 3: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 1% HANS, Group 4: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt % RF‐doped 5% HANS and Group 5: Experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HANS. Brackets were placed based on different adhesive modifications and samples underwent thermocycling. Samples were evaluated for μTBS, DC, and ML. The type of failure was assessed using ARI. Adhesive modified and un‐modified in four different concentrations (0%, 1%, 5%, and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF only were used to test efficacy against <jats:italic>Streptococcus mutans</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic>). The survival rate of <jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic> and ML was determined using the Kruskal–Wallis Test. For the analysis of μTBS, ANOVA was employed, followed by a post‐hoc Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test. The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only. The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HANS. Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of <jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic> and DC. Photoactivated RF‐doped HANS in 1% and 0.5 wt% Riboflavin alone in orthodontic adhesive for metallic bracket bonding improved micro tensile bond strength, ML, DC, and antibacterial scores.Research Highlights<jats:list list-type=\\\"bullet\\\"> <jats:list-item>The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HA‐NS.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of <jats:italic>S.mutans</jats:italic> and DC</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microscopy Research and Technique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microscopy Research and Technique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24687\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24687","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在正畸粘合剂中使用不同浓度的光活化核黄素掺杂羟基磷灰石(HA)纳米球(NS)(0%、1%、5% 和 10%)和单独使用 0.5 wt% RF 时,正畸托槽与珐琅质的微张力粘接强度(μTBS)、转换度(DC)、微渗漏(ML)抗菌效果和粘接残余指数(ARI)。样本按照预定的纳入标准纳入,并定位到牙釉质交界处(CEJ)。从市场上购买的羟基磷灰石纳米球(HANS)掺入了射频。在对 HANS 和 RF 掺杂的 HANS 进行表面表征评估的同时,还进行了 EDX 分析。根据正畸粘合剂改性实验对样品进行分组。第 1 组:Transbond XT 无改性;第 2 组:实验性 Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF;第 3 组:实验性 Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF 掺杂 1% HANS;第 4 组:实验性 Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF 掺杂 5% HANS;第 5 组:实验性 Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF 掺杂 10% HANS。根据不同的粘合剂改性放置支架,并对样品进行热循环。对样品进行了 μTBS、DC 和 ML 评估。使用 ARI 评估失效类型。使用四种不同浓度(0%、1%、5% 和 10%)的改性和未改性粘合剂以及仅 0.5 wt% RF 测试对变异链球菌(S.mutans)的功效。变异链球菌和 ML 的存活率是通过 Kruskal-Wallis 检验确定的。对 μTBS 的分析采用方差分析,然后进行事后 Tukey HSD 多重比较检验。第 2 组实验中,仅 Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF 的 μTBS 最高,ML 最低。第 5 组试验性 Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF 掺杂 10% HANS 的 μTBS 最低、ML 最高、DC 最低。在使用 Transbond XT 作为粘合剂的第 1 组样品中,突变杆状病毒和直流电的微生物数量明显最高。光活化射频掺杂的 1%和 0.5 wt%核黄素 HANS 仅用于金属托槽粘接的正畸粘合剂,可提高微拉伸粘接强度、ML、DC 和抗菌评分。第 5 组试验性 Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF 掺杂 10% HA-NS 的样品μTBS 最低、ML 最高、DC 最低。使用 Transbond XT 作为粘合剂的第 1 组样品显示出最高的变异性嗜血杆菌微生物数量和 DC
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Photoactivated riboflavin‐doped hydroxy apatite nanospheres infiltered in orthodontic adhesives
To assess micro‐tensile bond strength (μTBS), degree of conversion (DC), microleakage (ML) antibacterial efficacy, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of orthodontic brackets to enamel with different concentrations of photoactivated riboflavin‐doped hydroxyapatite (HA) nanospheres (NS) (0%,1%,5% and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF alone in orthodontic adhesive. Samples were included on the predefined inclusion criteria and positioned up to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Hydroxy apatite nanospheres (HANS) commercially bought were doped with RF. Surface characterization of HANS and RF‐doped HANS were assessed along with EDX analysis. Samples were grouped based on experimental orthodontic adhesive modification. Group 1: Transbond XT no modification, Group 2: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF, Group 3: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 1% HANS, Group 4: experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt % RF‐doped 5% HANS and Group 5: Experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HANS. Brackets were placed based on different adhesive modifications and samples underwent thermocycling. Samples were evaluated for μTBS, DC, and ML. The type of failure was assessed using ARI. Adhesive modified and un‐modified in four different concentrations (0%, 1%, 5%, and 10%) and 0.5 wt% RF only were used to test efficacy against Streptococcus mutans (S.mutans). The survival rate of S.mutans and ML was determined using the Kruskal–Wallis Test. For the analysis of μTBS, ANOVA was employed, followed by a post‐hoc Tukey HSD multiple comparisons test. The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only. The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HANS. Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of S.mutans and DC. Photoactivated RF‐doped HANS in 1% and 0.5 wt% Riboflavin alone in orthodontic adhesive for metallic bracket bonding improved micro tensile bond strength, ML, DC, and antibacterial scores.Research Highlights The highest μTBS and lowest ML were observed in Group 2 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF only. The lowest μTBS, highest ML, and lowest DC was seen in Group 5 experimental Transbond XT 0.5 wt% RF‐doped 10% HA‐NS. Samples in Group 1 in which Transbond XT was used as adhesive demonstrated significantly the highest microbial count of S.mutans and DC
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信