{"title":"泰利他赛(一种BLyS/APRIL双重抑制剂)治疗IgA肾病的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性病例对照研究","authors":"Meng Wang, Jianfei Ma, Li Yao, Yi Fan","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Telitacicept, a BLyS/APRIL dual-target fusion protein, has recently been used in autoimmune diseases. We assessed Telitacicept’ s efficacy and safety in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients. Methods This study included 42 IgAN patients who received Telitacicept treatment, forming the ‘whole Telitacicept group’. Among them, 20 patients who had not previously received corticosteroid (CS) therapy or immunosuppressive (IS) agents were categorized as the ‘newly treated Telitacicept subgroup’. Additionally, 28 patients who were selected to match historical controls received conventional IS (CS therapy with/without IS agents) therapy and were classified as the ‘conventional IS group’. Telitacicept was partially used in combination with conventional IS, including initial CS in different doses. Various indicators were compared at 4-week intervals up to 24 weeks among the three groups. Results After 24 weeks of treatment, the 24-hour proteinuria decreased from 1.70 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.05–2.58]g to 0.21 (0.39–0.13) g (P = 0.043) in the newly treated Telitacicept subgroup, from 1.78 (0.97–2.82) g to 0.44 (1.48–0.16) g (P = 0.001) in the conventional IS group, and from 1.07 (0.66–1.99) g to 0.26 (0.59–0.17) g (P = 0.028) in the whole Telitacicept group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased from (76.58 ± 30.26) ml/min/1.73m2 to (80.30 ± 26.76) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.016) in the newly treated Telitacicept subgroup, from (72.73 ± 33.41) ml/min/1.73m2 to (84.08.10 ± 26.81) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.011) in the conventional IS group, and from (70.10 ± 32.88) ml/min/1.73m2 to (71.21 ± 31.49) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.065) in the whole Telitacicept group. During follow-up periods, the efficacy rates of the three groups did not show statistically significant differences, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed. Conclusions Telitacicept may be a safe and effective treatment for IgAN, offering similar reductions in proteinuria and increases in eGFR as conventional IS therapy. After a 24-week follow-up, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was lower for Telitacicept than for conventional IS therapy.","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a BLyS/APRIL dual inhibitor, in the treatment of IgA nephropathy: a retrospective case-control study\",\"authors\":\"Meng Wang, Jianfei Ma, Li Yao, Yi Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfae285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Telitacicept, a BLyS/APRIL dual-target fusion protein, has recently been used in autoimmune diseases. We assessed Telitacicept’ s efficacy and safety in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients. Methods This study included 42 IgAN patients who received Telitacicept treatment, forming the ‘whole Telitacicept group’. Among them, 20 patients who had not previously received corticosteroid (CS) therapy or immunosuppressive (IS) agents were categorized as the ‘newly treated Telitacicept subgroup’. Additionally, 28 patients who were selected to match historical controls received conventional IS (CS therapy with/without IS agents) therapy and were classified as the ‘conventional IS group’. Telitacicept was partially used in combination with conventional IS, including initial CS in different doses. Various indicators were compared at 4-week intervals up to 24 weeks among the three groups. Results After 24 weeks of treatment, the 24-hour proteinuria decreased from 1.70 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.05–2.58]g to 0.21 (0.39–0.13) g (P = 0.043) in the newly treated Telitacicept subgroup, from 1.78 (0.97–2.82) g to 0.44 (1.48–0.16) g (P = 0.001) in the conventional IS group, and from 1.07 (0.66–1.99) g to 0.26 (0.59–0.17) g (P = 0.028) in the whole Telitacicept group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased from (76.58 ± 30.26) ml/min/1.73m2 to (80.30 ± 26.76) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.016) in the newly treated Telitacicept subgroup, from (72.73 ± 33.41) ml/min/1.73m2 to (84.08.10 ± 26.81) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.011) in the conventional IS group, and from (70.10 ± 32.88) ml/min/1.73m2 to (71.21 ± 31.49) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.065) in the whole Telitacicept group. During follow-up periods, the efficacy rates of the three groups did not show statistically significant differences, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed. Conclusions Telitacicept may be a safe and effective treatment for IgAN, offering similar reductions in proteinuria and increases in eGFR as conventional IS therapy. After a 24-week follow-up, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was lower for Telitacicept than for conventional IS therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae285\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a BLyS/APRIL dual inhibitor, in the treatment of IgA nephropathy: a retrospective case-control study
Background Telitacicept, a BLyS/APRIL dual-target fusion protein, has recently been used in autoimmune diseases. We assessed Telitacicept’ s efficacy and safety in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients. Methods This study included 42 IgAN patients who received Telitacicept treatment, forming the ‘whole Telitacicept group’. Among them, 20 patients who had not previously received corticosteroid (CS) therapy or immunosuppressive (IS) agents were categorized as the ‘newly treated Telitacicept subgroup’. Additionally, 28 patients who were selected to match historical controls received conventional IS (CS therapy with/without IS agents) therapy and were classified as the ‘conventional IS group’. Telitacicept was partially used in combination with conventional IS, including initial CS in different doses. Various indicators were compared at 4-week intervals up to 24 weeks among the three groups. Results After 24 weeks of treatment, the 24-hour proteinuria decreased from 1.70 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.05–2.58]g to 0.21 (0.39–0.13) g (P = 0.043) in the newly treated Telitacicept subgroup, from 1.78 (0.97–2.82) g to 0.44 (1.48–0.16) g (P = 0.001) in the conventional IS group, and from 1.07 (0.66–1.99) g to 0.26 (0.59–0.17) g (P = 0.028) in the whole Telitacicept group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased from (76.58 ± 30.26) ml/min/1.73m2 to (80.30 ± 26.76) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.016) in the newly treated Telitacicept subgroup, from (72.73 ± 33.41) ml/min/1.73m2 to (84.08.10 ± 26.81) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.011) in the conventional IS group, and from (70.10 ± 32.88) ml/min/1.73m2 to (71.21 ± 31.49) ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.065) in the whole Telitacicept group. During follow-up periods, the efficacy rates of the three groups did not show statistically significant differences, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed. Conclusions Telitacicept may be a safe and effective treatment for IgAN, offering similar reductions in proteinuria and increases in eGFR as conventional IS therapy. After a 24-week follow-up, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was lower for Telitacicept than for conventional IS therapy.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.