SolBeePopecotox:用于孤蜂农药风险评估的种群模型

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Amelie Schmolke, Nika Galic, Vanessa Roeben, Thomas G. Preuss, Mark Miles, Silvia Hinarejos
{"title":"SolBeePopecotox:用于孤蜂农药风险评估的种群模型","authors":"Amelie Schmolke, Nika Galic, Vanessa Roeben, Thomas G. Preuss, Mark Miles, Silvia Hinarejos","doi":"10.1002/etc.5990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In agricultural landscapes, solitary bees occur in a large diversity of species and are important for crop and wildflower pollination. They are distinguished from honey bees and bumble bees by their solitary lifestyle as well as different nesting strategies, phenologies, and floral preferences. Their ecological traits and presence in agricultural landscapes imply potential exposure to pesticides and suggest a need to conduct ecological risk assessments for solitary bees. However, assessing risks to the large diversity of managed and wild bees across landscapes and regions poses a formidable challenge. Population models provide tools to estimate potential population‐level effects of pesticide exposures, can support field study design and interpretation, and can be applied to expand study data to untested conditions. We present a population model for solitary bees, SolBeePop<jats:sub><jats:italic>ecotox</jats:italic></jats:sub>, developed for use in the context of ecological risk assessments. The trait‐based model extends a previous version with the explicit representation of exposures to pesticides from relevant routes. Effects are implemented in the model using a simplified toxicokinetic–toxicodynamic model, BeeGUTS (GUTS = generalized unified threshold model for survival), adapted specifically for bees. We evaluated the model with data from semifield studies conducted with the red mason bee, <jats:italic>Osmia bicornis</jats:italic>, in which bees were foraging in tunnels over control and insecticide‐treated oilseed rape fields. We extended the simulations to capture hypothetical semifield studies with two soil‐nesting species, <jats:italic>Nomia melanderi</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Eucera pruinosa</jats:italic>, which are difficult to test in empirical studies. The model provides a versatile tool for higher‐tier risk assessments, for instance, to estimate effects of potential exposures, expanding available study data to untested species, environmental conditions, or exposure scenarios. <jats:italic>Environ Toxicol Chem</jats:italic> 2024;00:1–17. © 2024 SETAC","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SolBeePopecotox: A Population Model for Pesticide Risk Assessments of Solitary Bees\",\"authors\":\"Amelie Schmolke, Nika Galic, Vanessa Roeben, Thomas G. Preuss, Mark Miles, Silvia Hinarejos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/etc.5990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In agricultural landscapes, solitary bees occur in a large diversity of species and are important for crop and wildflower pollination. They are distinguished from honey bees and bumble bees by their solitary lifestyle as well as different nesting strategies, phenologies, and floral preferences. Their ecological traits and presence in agricultural landscapes imply potential exposure to pesticides and suggest a need to conduct ecological risk assessments for solitary bees. However, assessing risks to the large diversity of managed and wild bees across landscapes and regions poses a formidable challenge. Population models provide tools to estimate potential population‐level effects of pesticide exposures, can support field study design and interpretation, and can be applied to expand study data to untested conditions. We present a population model for solitary bees, SolBeePop<jats:sub><jats:italic>ecotox</jats:italic></jats:sub>, developed for use in the context of ecological risk assessments. The trait‐based model extends a previous version with the explicit representation of exposures to pesticides from relevant routes. Effects are implemented in the model using a simplified toxicokinetic–toxicodynamic model, BeeGUTS (GUTS = generalized unified threshold model for survival), adapted specifically for bees. We evaluated the model with data from semifield studies conducted with the red mason bee, <jats:italic>Osmia bicornis</jats:italic>, in which bees were foraging in tunnels over control and insecticide‐treated oilseed rape fields. We extended the simulations to capture hypothetical semifield studies with two soil‐nesting species, <jats:italic>Nomia melanderi</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Eucera pruinosa</jats:italic>, which are difficult to test in empirical studies. The model provides a versatile tool for higher‐tier risk assessments, for instance, to estimate effects of potential exposures, expanding available study data to untested species, environmental conditions, or exposure scenarios. <jats:italic>Environ Toxicol Chem</jats:italic> 2024;00:1–17. © 2024 SETAC\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在农业景观中,独居蜂的种类繁多,对作物和野花授粉非常重要。它们与蜜蜂和熊蜂的区别在于其独居生活方式以及不同的筑巢策略、物候和花卉偏好。它们的生态特征和在农业景观中的存在意味着可能会接触到杀虫剂,并表明有必要对独居蜜蜂进行生态风险评估。然而,要评估不同景观和地区的管理蜜蜂和野生蜜蜂的巨大多样性所面临的风险,是一项艰巨的挑战。种群模型提供了估算农药暴露对种群潜在影响的工具,可以支持野外研究的设计和解释,并可用于将研究数据扩展到未经测试的条件。我们介绍了一种用于生态风险评估的独居蜜蜂种群模型 SolBeePopecotox。这个基于性状的模型扩展了之前的版本,明确表示了从相关途径接触农药的情况。该模型使用简化的毒代动力学-毒效动力学模型 BeeGUTS(GUTS = 生存的广义统一阈值模型)来实现效应,该模型专门针对蜜蜂进行了调整。我们利用对赤石蜂(Osmia bicornis)进行的半田间研究数据对该模型进行了评估,研究中蜜蜂在对照田和杀虫剂处理过的油菜田的隧道中觅食。我们对模型进行了扩展,以捕捉两种土壤筑巢物种(Nomia melanderi 和 Eucera pruinosa)的假定半田间研究,这些物种很难在实证研究中进行测试。该模型为更高层次的风险评估提供了一个多功能工具,例如,估计潜在暴露的影响,将现有研究数据扩展到未经测试的物种、环境条件或暴露情景。环境毒物化学 2024;00:1-17。© 2024 SETAC
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SolBeePopecotox: A Population Model for Pesticide Risk Assessments of Solitary Bees
In agricultural landscapes, solitary bees occur in a large diversity of species and are important for crop and wildflower pollination. They are distinguished from honey bees and bumble bees by their solitary lifestyle as well as different nesting strategies, phenologies, and floral preferences. Their ecological traits and presence in agricultural landscapes imply potential exposure to pesticides and suggest a need to conduct ecological risk assessments for solitary bees. However, assessing risks to the large diversity of managed and wild bees across landscapes and regions poses a formidable challenge. Population models provide tools to estimate potential population‐level effects of pesticide exposures, can support field study design and interpretation, and can be applied to expand study data to untested conditions. We present a population model for solitary bees, SolBeePopecotox, developed for use in the context of ecological risk assessments. The trait‐based model extends a previous version with the explicit representation of exposures to pesticides from relevant routes. Effects are implemented in the model using a simplified toxicokinetic–toxicodynamic model, BeeGUTS (GUTS = generalized unified threshold model for survival), adapted specifically for bees. We evaluated the model with data from semifield studies conducted with the red mason bee, Osmia bicornis, in which bees were foraging in tunnels over control and insecticide‐treated oilseed rape fields. We extended the simulations to capture hypothetical semifield studies with two soil‐nesting species, Nomia melanderi and Eucera pruinosa, which are difficult to test in empirical studies. The model provides a versatile tool for higher‐tier risk assessments, for instance, to estimate effects of potential exposures, expanding available study data to untested species, environmental conditions, or exposure scenarios. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;00:1–17. © 2024 SETAC
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信