评估从焚烧过的土壤中分离亲火细菌和真菌的最佳方法

Dylan J Enright, Ryan J Quaal, Aishwarya Veerabahu, Anna Nguyen, Jenna Maddox, Sydney I Glassman
{"title":"评估从焚烧过的土壤中分离亲火细菌和真菌的最佳方法","authors":"Dylan J Enright, Ryan J Quaal, Aishwarya Veerabahu, Anna Nguyen, Jenna Maddox, Sydney I Glassman","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.16.612975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A live microbial culture is invaluable to assess traits and functions via 'omics and biophysical assays. However, it is not always logistically feasible to culture immediately from freshly obtained soil, and selecting the proper media for culturing is not trivial. While building a culture collection of pyrophilous microbes obtained from burnt soil, we tested the best 1) method of storing soil to retain culturable viability and 2) media to garner the most microbial diversity. We tested four methods of soil storage (dried, stored at 4°C, stored at -80°C alone or in glycerol) and compared to fresh soil obtained 6 months after a severe California chapparal shrubland wildfire. For bacteria, soil frozen at -80°C with glycerol preserved the greatest diversity (25 species, 13 genera) compared to fresh soil (26 species, 13 genera). For fungi, soil stored at -80°C alone preserved the greatest diversity (10 species, 3 genera) compared to fresh soil (13 species, 7 genera). We also tested 3 media types: rich media (Lysogeny Broth (LB) for bacteria; Malt Yeast Agar (MYA) for fungi), oligotrophic media (Reasoner's 2 Agar (R2A) and media made from pyrogenic organic matter (PyOM). For bacteria, culturing on LB and R2A garnered the greatest diversity (LB = 26 species, 13 genera, R2A = 27 species, 15 genera). For fungi a combination of R2A and PyOM captured the greatest diversity (R2A = 15 species, 8 genera, PyOM = 12 species, 6 genera). For both bacteria and fungi, some species of interest were only captured using the PyOM media. Using a combination of these methods from 2018-2022, we cultured >500 isolates (286 bacteria; 258 fungi) from burned soils of 7 Southern California wildfires.","PeriodicalId":501357,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Best Practices for Isolating Pyrophilous Bacteria and Fungi from Burned Soil\",\"authors\":\"Dylan J Enright, Ryan J Quaal, Aishwarya Veerabahu, Anna Nguyen, Jenna Maddox, Sydney I Glassman\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.16.612975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A live microbial culture is invaluable to assess traits and functions via 'omics and biophysical assays. However, it is not always logistically feasible to culture immediately from freshly obtained soil, and selecting the proper media for culturing is not trivial. While building a culture collection of pyrophilous microbes obtained from burnt soil, we tested the best 1) method of storing soil to retain culturable viability and 2) media to garner the most microbial diversity. We tested four methods of soil storage (dried, stored at 4°C, stored at -80°C alone or in glycerol) and compared to fresh soil obtained 6 months after a severe California chapparal shrubland wildfire. For bacteria, soil frozen at -80°C with glycerol preserved the greatest diversity (25 species, 13 genera) compared to fresh soil (26 species, 13 genera). For fungi, soil stored at -80°C alone preserved the greatest diversity (10 species, 3 genera) compared to fresh soil (13 species, 7 genera). We also tested 3 media types: rich media (Lysogeny Broth (LB) for bacteria; Malt Yeast Agar (MYA) for fungi), oligotrophic media (Reasoner's 2 Agar (R2A) and media made from pyrogenic organic matter (PyOM). For bacteria, culturing on LB and R2A garnered the greatest diversity (LB = 26 species, 13 genera, R2A = 27 species, 15 genera). For fungi a combination of R2A and PyOM captured the greatest diversity (R2A = 15 species, 8 genera, PyOM = 12 species, 6 genera). For both bacteria and fungi, some species of interest were only captured using the PyOM media. Using a combination of these methods from 2018-2022, we cultured >500 isolates (286 bacteria; 258 fungi) from burned soils of 7 Southern California wildfires.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.612975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.612975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

活体微生物培养对于通过'omics'和生物物理检测评估性状和功能非常重要。然而,从新鲜土壤中立即进行培养在逻辑上并不总是可行的,而且选择合适的培养基也并非易事。在建立从焚烧土壤中获得的亲热性微生物培养收集的过程中,我们测试了 1) 保持可培养活力的最佳土壤储存方法和 2) 获得最多微生物多样性的培养基。我们测试了四种土壤保存方法(干燥、4°C 保存、-80°C 单独保存或甘油保存),并将其与在一场严重的加利福尼亚查帕拉灌木林野火后 6 个月获得的新鲜土壤进行了比较。就细菌而言,与新鲜土壤(26 种,13 个属)相比,-80°C 加甘油冷冻的土壤保存了最丰富的多样性(25 种,13 个属)。就真菌而言,与新鲜土壤(13 种,7 属)相比,仅保存在零下 80°C 的土壤保存了最丰富的多样性(10 种,3 属)。我们还测试了 3 种培养基类型:富营养培养基(细菌用溶菌酶肉汤(LB);真菌用麦芽酵母琼脂(MYA))、寡营养培养基(Reasoner's 2 琼脂(R2A))和热原有机物培养基(PyOM)。在 LB 和 R2A 培养基上培养的细菌种类最多(LB = 26 种、13 属,R2A = 27 种、15 属)。对于真菌来说,R2A 和 PyOM 的组合能获得最大的多样性(R2A = 15 种,8 属;PyOM = 12 种,6 属)。对于细菌和真菌,只有使用 PyOM 培养基才能捕获到一些感兴趣的物种。从 2018 年到 2022 年,我们综合使用了这些方法,从南加州 7 场野火的焚烧土壤中培养出了 500 个分离物(286 个细菌;258 个真菌)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Best Practices for Isolating Pyrophilous Bacteria and Fungi from Burned Soil
A live microbial culture is invaluable to assess traits and functions via 'omics and biophysical assays. However, it is not always logistically feasible to culture immediately from freshly obtained soil, and selecting the proper media for culturing is not trivial. While building a culture collection of pyrophilous microbes obtained from burnt soil, we tested the best 1) method of storing soil to retain culturable viability and 2) media to garner the most microbial diversity. We tested four methods of soil storage (dried, stored at 4°C, stored at -80°C alone or in glycerol) and compared to fresh soil obtained 6 months after a severe California chapparal shrubland wildfire. For bacteria, soil frozen at -80°C with glycerol preserved the greatest diversity (25 species, 13 genera) compared to fresh soil (26 species, 13 genera). For fungi, soil stored at -80°C alone preserved the greatest diversity (10 species, 3 genera) compared to fresh soil (13 species, 7 genera). We also tested 3 media types: rich media (Lysogeny Broth (LB) for bacteria; Malt Yeast Agar (MYA) for fungi), oligotrophic media (Reasoner's 2 Agar (R2A) and media made from pyrogenic organic matter (PyOM). For bacteria, culturing on LB and R2A garnered the greatest diversity (LB = 26 species, 13 genera, R2A = 27 species, 15 genera). For fungi a combination of R2A and PyOM captured the greatest diversity (R2A = 15 species, 8 genera, PyOM = 12 species, 6 genera). For both bacteria and fungi, some species of interest were only captured using the PyOM media. Using a combination of these methods from 2018-2022, we cultured >500 isolates (286 bacteria; 258 fungi) from burned soils of 7 Southern California wildfires.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信