清除二氧化碳的碳核算

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sarah L. Nordahl, Rebecca J. Hanes, Kimberley K. Mayfield, Corey Myers, Sarah E. Baker, Corinne D. Scown
{"title":"清除二氧化碳的碳核算","authors":"Sarah L. Nordahl, Rebecca J. Hanes, Kimberley K. Mayfield, Corey Myers, Sarah E. Baker, Corinne D. Scown","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are essential to address climate change and serve to compensate for legacy and hard-to-abate greenhouse gas emissions. Although near-term emissions reductions should be the priority, development and deployment of CDR must proceed now to ensure that relevant technologies are ready at scale in the future. Despite a rapid growth in CDR purchases, no single standardized methodology for evaluating project-level net CO<sub>2</sub> removal exists. Life cycle assessment (LCA) frequently produces net-negative emissions footprints, but only a small subset of those systems achieves a net flux of CO<sub>2</sub> out of the atmosphere. In contrast to LCA, CDR accounting uses expansive system boundaries and excludes avoidance credits to distinguish between systems that achieve net removal from those that only contribute to emissions mitigation. This primer discusses a framework and set of metrics for CDR accounting.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon accounting for carbon dioxide removal\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L. Nordahl, Rebecca J. Hanes, Kimberley K. Mayfield, Corey Myers, Sarah E. Baker, Corinne D. Scown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are essential to address climate change and serve to compensate for legacy and hard-to-abate greenhouse gas emissions. Although near-term emissions reductions should be the priority, development and deployment of CDR must proceed now to ensure that relevant technologies are ready at scale in the future. Despite a rapid growth in CDR purchases, no single standardized methodology for evaluating project-level net CO<sub>2</sub> removal exists. Life cycle assessment (LCA) frequently produces net-negative emissions footprints, but only a small subset of those systems achieves a net flux of CO<sub>2</sub> out of the atmosphere. In contrast to LCA, CDR accounting uses expansive system boundaries and excludes avoidance credits to distinguish between systems that achieve net removal from those that only contribute to emissions mitigation. This primer discusses a framework and set of metrics for CDR accounting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Earth\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二氧化碳清除(CDR)技术是应对气候变化的关键,也是对遗留的和难以消减的温室气体排放的补偿。尽管近期减排应是优先事项,但现在就必须着手开发和部署 CDR,以确保相关技术在未来能够大规模应用。尽管 CDR 的购买量快速增长,但目前还没有一种单一的标准化方法来评估项目层面的二氧化碳净减排量。生命周期评估(LCA)经常会产生净负值排放足迹,但这些系统中只有一小部分实现了二氧化碳净排出大气。与生命周期评估不同的是,CDR 核算使用宽泛的系统边界,并排除避免排放的信用额度,以区分实现净清除的系统与仅有助于减排的系统。本入门书讨论了 CDR 核算的框架和一套衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon accounting for carbon dioxide removal

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are essential to address climate change and serve to compensate for legacy and hard-to-abate greenhouse gas emissions. Although near-term emissions reductions should be the priority, development and deployment of CDR must proceed now to ensure that relevant technologies are ready at scale in the future. Despite a rapid growth in CDR purchases, no single standardized methodology for evaluating project-level net CO2 removal exists. Life cycle assessment (LCA) frequently produces net-negative emissions footprints, but only a small subset of those systems achieves a net flux of CO2 out of the atmosphere. In contrast to LCA, CDR accounting uses expansive system boundaries and excludes avoidance credits to distinguish between systems that achieve net removal from those that only contribute to emissions mitigation. This primer discusses a framework and set of metrics for CDR accounting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信