沙特阿拉伯多中心研究:机器人和腹腔镜细胞再生手术及腹腔内热化疗

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mohammad Alyami,Abdullah Muhammed Abdulrahem,Mashhour Alqannas,Hessa AlHabes,Awad Alyami,Sulaiman Alshammari,Delia Cortes Guiral,Mahdi Alzamanan,Nayef Alzahrani,Thamer Bin Traiki
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯多中心研究:机器人和腹腔镜细胞再生手术及腹腔内热化疗","authors":"Mohammad Alyami,Abdullah Muhammed Abdulrahem,Mashhour Alqannas,Hessa AlHabes,Awad Alyami,Sulaiman Alshammari,Delia Cortes Guiral,Mahdi Alzamanan,Nayef Alzahrani,Thamer Bin Traiki","doi":"10.1002/jso.27902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPeritoneal metastasis (PM) is a common evolution of abdominal tumors. Without aggressive multimodal treatment, it is associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to present a multicenter results from Saudi Arabia on minimally invasive CRS and HIIPEC.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA retrospective analysis of a prospective maintained multicenter database was queried for all patients treated with laparoscopic or robotic CRS and HIPEC between 2019 and 2024 in Saudi Arabia. Surgical and oncological outcome was analyzed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nEleven consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive CRS and HIPEC between 2019 and 2024. Eight patients (72.7%) were operated by laparoscopy, one of them by single port access and three patients (27.3%) were operated robotically. Six patients (54.5%) were female. Median age was 42 (29-64). Primary tumor was PMP from the appendix, colon, and MCM in 6 (54.5%), 4 (36.4%), and 1 (9.1%) respectively. The median duration to complete the surgical procedure for all patients was 330 (230-580) min and for robotic CRS the median docking time was 570 (330-580) min. Median PCI was 2 (1-7) and completeness Cytoreduction (CC score 0) was achieved in the all patients (100%). Median hospital stay was 8 days (3-20). Four patients had one night postoperative ICU stay. Major morbidity (CTCAE) 3 and 4 occurred in three patients (27.3%) (Port site hernia, bleeding, and wound infection). No readmission to the hospital and no 90 days mortalities.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe minimally invasive approach by laparoscopy or robot is a feasible and promising option for CRS and HIPEC. It reduces the hospital stay, early return to intended oncological treatment (RIOT). Further prospective clinical studies are needed to evaluate this approach.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic and Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, Multicenter Study From Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Alyami,Abdullah Muhammed Abdulrahem,Mashhour Alqannas,Hessa AlHabes,Awad Alyami,Sulaiman Alshammari,Delia Cortes Guiral,Mahdi Alzamanan,Nayef Alzahrani,Thamer Bin Traiki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPeritoneal metastasis (PM) is a common evolution of abdominal tumors. Without aggressive multimodal treatment, it is associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to present a multicenter results from Saudi Arabia on minimally invasive CRS and HIIPEC.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA retrospective analysis of a prospective maintained multicenter database was queried for all patients treated with laparoscopic or robotic CRS and HIPEC between 2019 and 2024 in Saudi Arabia. Surgical and oncological outcome was analyzed.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nEleven consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive CRS and HIPEC between 2019 and 2024. Eight patients (72.7%) were operated by laparoscopy, one of them by single port access and three patients (27.3%) were operated robotically. Six patients (54.5%) were female. Median age was 42 (29-64). Primary tumor was PMP from the appendix, colon, and MCM in 6 (54.5%), 4 (36.4%), and 1 (9.1%) respectively. The median duration to complete the surgical procedure for all patients was 330 (230-580) min and for robotic CRS the median docking time was 570 (330-580) min. Median PCI was 2 (1-7) and completeness Cytoreduction (CC score 0) was achieved in the all patients (100%). Median hospital stay was 8 days (3-20). Four patients had one night postoperative ICU stay. Major morbidity (CTCAE) 3 and 4 occurred in three patients (27.3%) (Port site hernia, bleeding, and wound infection). No readmission to the hospital and no 90 days mortalities.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe minimally invasive approach by laparoscopy or robot is a feasible and promising option for CRS and HIPEC. It reduces the hospital stay, early return to intended oncological treatment (RIOT). Further prospective clinical studies are needed to evaluate this approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27902\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景腹膜转移(PM)是腹部肿瘤的一种常见演变。如果不进行积极的多模式治疗,其预后较差。本研究旨在介绍沙特阿拉伯多中心关于微创 CRS 和 HIIPEC 的研究结果。方法对前瞻性维护的多中心数据库进行回顾性分析,查询了 2019 年至 2024 年期间沙特阿拉伯所有接受腹腔镜或机器人 CRS 和 HIPEC 治疗的患者。结果在 2019 年至 2024 年期间,有七名连续患者接受了微创 CRS 和 HIPEC 治疗。八名患者(72.7%)采用腹腔镜手术,其中一名患者采用单孔入路手术,三名患者(27.3%)采用机器人手术。六名患者(54.5%)为女性。中位年龄为42岁(29-64岁)。原发肿瘤为阑尾、结肠和MCM的PMP患者分别为6例(54.5%)、4例(36.4%)和1例(9.1%)。所有患者完成手术的中位时间为330(230-580)分钟,机器人CRS的中位对接时间为570(330-580)分钟。PCI中位数为2(1-7),所有患者(100%)都达到了完整的细胞减灭术(CC评分0)。住院时间中位数为 8 天(3-20 天)。四名患者术后在重症监护室住了一晚。三名患者(27.3%)出现了严重的发病率(CTCAE)3 级和 4 级(切口部位疝气、出血和伤口感染)。结论腹腔镜或机器人微创手术是 CRS 和 HIPEC 的可行且有前景的选择。结论腹腔镜或机器人微创方法是 CRS 和 HIPEC 的可行且有前景的选择,它缩短了住院时间,并能及早恢复预期的肿瘤治疗(RIOT)。需要进一步的前瞻性临床研究来评估这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic and Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, Multicenter Study From Saudi Arabia.
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a common evolution of abdominal tumors. Without aggressive multimodal treatment, it is associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to present a multicenter results from Saudi Arabia on minimally invasive CRS and HIIPEC. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospective maintained multicenter database was queried for all patients treated with laparoscopic or robotic CRS and HIPEC between 2019 and 2024 in Saudi Arabia. Surgical and oncological outcome was analyzed. RESULTS Eleven consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive CRS and HIPEC between 2019 and 2024. Eight patients (72.7%) were operated by laparoscopy, one of them by single port access and three patients (27.3%) were operated robotically. Six patients (54.5%) were female. Median age was 42 (29-64). Primary tumor was PMP from the appendix, colon, and MCM in 6 (54.5%), 4 (36.4%), and 1 (9.1%) respectively. The median duration to complete the surgical procedure for all patients was 330 (230-580) min and for robotic CRS the median docking time was 570 (330-580) min. Median PCI was 2 (1-7) and completeness Cytoreduction (CC score 0) was achieved in the all patients (100%). Median hospital stay was 8 days (3-20). Four patients had one night postoperative ICU stay. Major morbidity (CTCAE) 3 and 4 occurred in three patients (27.3%) (Port site hernia, bleeding, and wound infection). No readmission to the hospital and no 90 days mortalities. CONCLUSION The minimally invasive approach by laparoscopy or robot is a feasible and promising option for CRS and HIPEC. It reduces the hospital stay, early return to intended oncological treatment (RIOT). Further prospective clinical studies are needed to evaluate this approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信