通过将单个 5 升容器供应的浓缩酸输送改为中央输送系统,减少拥有 30 张床位的血液透析单位的碳足迹

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Gareth Murcutt, Rosie Hillson, Cate Goodlad, Andrew Davenport
{"title":"通过将单个 5 升容器供应的浓缩酸输送改为中央输送系统,减少拥有 30 张床位的血液透析单位的碳足迹","authors":"Gareth Murcutt, Rosie Hillson, Cate Goodlad, Andrew Davenport","doi":"10.1007/s40620-024-02073-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Haemodialysis treatments generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mainly as a result of the equipment, consumables and pharmaceuticals required. An internal audit demonstrated a 33% wastage of acid concentrate when using individual 5.0 L containers at a 1:44 dilution ratio. We therefore investigated whether changing the delivery system for acid concentrate would reduce wastage and any associated greenhouse gas emissions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We calculated the difference for a 30-bed dialysis unit between receiving acid concentrate in single-use 5.0 L plastic containers versus bulk delivery for a central acid delivery system connected to the dialysis machines. Estimates of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) emissions were made using the United Kingdom government database and other sources.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A 30-station dialysis unit functioning at maximum capacity (3 shifts and 6 days/week), switching to bulk delivery and central acid delivery could realise an approximate total reduction of 33,841 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/year; in reduced product wastage, saving 6192 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e, 5205 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e from fewer deliveries, and 22,444 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e saving from a reduction in packaging and waste generated, which equates approximately to a one tonne reduction in CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions per dialysis station/year.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Switching from delivering acid concentrate in individual 5.0 L containers to a central acid delivery system can result in substantial reductions in CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions within a dialysis clinic. The emission savings from reducing the single-use plastic packaging greatly outweigh any gains from eliminating wastage of acid concentrate. Dialysis companies and clinicians should consider reviewing the design of current and future dialysis facilities and policies to determine whether reductions in CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions can be made.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing the carbon footprint for a 30-bed haemodialysis unit by changing the delivery of acid concentrate supplied by individual 5 L containers to a central delivery system\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Murcutt, Rosie Hillson, Cate Goodlad, Andrew Davenport\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40620-024-02073-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Haemodialysis treatments generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mainly as a result of the equipment, consumables and pharmaceuticals required. An internal audit demonstrated a 33% wastage of acid concentrate when using individual 5.0 L containers at a 1:44 dilution ratio. We therefore investigated whether changing the delivery system for acid concentrate would reduce wastage and any associated greenhouse gas emissions.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We calculated the difference for a 30-bed dialysis unit between receiving acid concentrate in single-use 5.0 L plastic containers versus bulk delivery for a central acid delivery system connected to the dialysis machines. Estimates of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) emissions were made using the United Kingdom government database and other sources.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>A 30-station dialysis unit functioning at maximum capacity (3 shifts and 6 days/week), switching to bulk delivery and central acid delivery could realise an approximate total reduction of 33,841 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/year; in reduced product wastage, saving 6192 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e, 5205 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e from fewer deliveries, and 22,444 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e saving from a reduction in packaging and waste generated, which equates approximately to a one tonne reduction in CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions per dialysis station/year.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Switching from delivering acid concentrate in individual 5.0 L containers to a central acid delivery system can result in substantial reductions in CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions within a dialysis clinic. The emission savings from reducing the single-use plastic packaging greatly outweigh any gains from eliminating wastage of acid concentrate. Dialysis companies and clinicians should consider reviewing the design of current and future dialysis facilities and policies to determine whether reductions in CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions can be made.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02073-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02073-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景血液透析治疗产生温室气体(GHG)排放的主要原因是所需的设备、耗材和药品。一项内部审计显示,以 1:44 的稀释比例使用 5.0 升的独立容器时,浓缩酸的浪费率高达 33%。因此,我们研究了改变酸浓缩液的输送系统是否会减少浪费和相关的温室气体排放。我们计算了一个拥有 30 张床位的透析单位使用一次性 5.0 L 塑料容器接收酸浓缩液与使用与透析机相连的中央酸输送系统批量输送酸浓缩液之间的差异。二氧化碳当量 (CO2e) 排放量是通过英国政府数据库和其他来源估算得出的。结果一个 30 个透析站的透析设备以最大产能运行(每周工作 6 天,每班工作 3 次),改用散装酸输送和中央酸输送每年可减少约 33,841 kgCO2e 的总排放量;减少产品损耗可减少 6192 kgCO2e 的排放量,减少输送可减少 5205 kgCO2e 的排放量,减少包装和产生的废物可减少 22,444 kgCO2e 的排放量,这相当于每个透析站每年可减少 1 吨 CO2e 的排放量。结论从使用 5.0 升容器单独运送浓缩酸到使用中央酸运送系统,可大幅减少透析诊所内的二氧化碳排放量。减少一次性塑料包装所带来的减排量大大超过了消除浓缩酸浪费所带来的收益。透析公司和临床医生应考虑审查当前和未来透析设施的设计和政策,以确定是否可以减少 CO2e 排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reducing the carbon footprint for a 30-bed haemodialysis unit by changing the delivery of acid concentrate supplied by individual 5 L containers to a central delivery system

Reducing the carbon footprint for a 30-bed haemodialysis unit by changing the delivery of acid concentrate supplied by individual 5 L containers to a central delivery system

Background

Haemodialysis treatments generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mainly as a result of the equipment, consumables and pharmaceuticals required. An internal audit demonstrated a 33% wastage of acid concentrate when using individual 5.0 L containers at a 1:44 dilution ratio. We therefore investigated whether changing the delivery system for acid concentrate would reduce wastage and any associated greenhouse gas emissions.

Methods

We calculated the difference for a 30-bed dialysis unit between receiving acid concentrate in single-use 5.0 L plastic containers versus bulk delivery for a central acid delivery system connected to the dialysis machines. Estimates of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions were made using the United Kingdom government database and other sources.

Results

A 30-station dialysis unit functioning at maximum capacity (3 shifts and 6 days/week), switching to bulk delivery and central acid delivery could realise an approximate total reduction of 33,841 kgCO2e/year; in reduced product wastage, saving 6192 kgCO2e, 5205 kgCO2e from fewer deliveries, and 22,444 kgCO2e saving from a reduction in packaging and waste generated, which equates approximately to a one tonne reduction in CO2e emissions per dialysis station/year.

Conclusions

Switching from delivering acid concentrate in individual 5.0 L containers to a central acid delivery system can result in substantial reductions in CO2e emissions within a dialysis clinic. The emission savings from reducing the single-use plastic packaging greatly outweigh any gains from eliminating wastage of acid concentrate. Dialysis companies and clinicians should consider reviewing the design of current and future dialysis facilities and policies to determine whether reductions in CO2e emissions can be made.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信