尼古丁替代疗法与口腔健康:随机试验中不良反应的网络荟萃分析

Q3 Dentistry
Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan
{"title":"尼古丁替代疗法与口腔健康:随机试验中不良反应的网络荟萃分析","authors":"Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01064-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) are the primary pharmacological option for smokers looking to quit. However, they can lead to oral health issues, including aphthous ulcers, gastric irritation resulting in tooth wear, mouth irritation, soreness, and dryness, which may decrease patient adherence. Dentists should be integrated into the tobacco cessation team to prevent, detect, and manage these oral side effects associated with NRT use. Therefore, the objective of this network meta-analysis is to examine the relationship between different forms of NRTs and their oral side effects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methodology</h3><p>Databases were screened for literature and full text articles were obtained for eligible studies. Relevant data was extracted. NMA Studio was used to perform random-effects network meta-analysis to generate mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates from odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The forest plot was generated, and the network diagram was drawn for key comparisons. The OR and 95% CI were estimated from the data on the number of patients that reported the oral side effects in the included studies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 21 articles were included. The Risk of Bias assessment revealed a moderate to low risk across all domains for the included studies. The mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates indicated that nicotine gum was significantly associated with the occurrence of aphthous ulcers [2.25 (1.03, 4.90)] and gastric reflux/vomiting [4.40 (1.51, 12.80)]. Additionally, the results showed that nasal spray significantly caused mouth/throat irritation [5.37 (1.03, 27.92)] and taste disturbance [4.87 (2.83, 8.37)] in comparison to tested NRT interventions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Significant oral side effects are associated with NRT use, as demonstrated in this study. Dentists should implement tobacco cessation methods in their practices, including pharmacotherapy, to effectively monitor these patients. Continuous education and certification programs should be mandatory for dentists who want to practice tobacco cessation. This should also be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum to help dentists gain confidence in prescribing NRT. Standard evidence-based guidelines should be published to outline possible methods for encouraging tobacco cessation in dental settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nicotine replacement therapy and oral health: a network meta-analysis of adverse effects in randomized trials\",\"authors\":\"Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41432-024-01064-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) are the primary pharmacological option for smokers looking to quit. However, they can lead to oral health issues, including aphthous ulcers, gastric irritation resulting in tooth wear, mouth irritation, soreness, and dryness, which may decrease patient adherence. Dentists should be integrated into the tobacco cessation team to prevent, detect, and manage these oral side effects associated with NRT use. Therefore, the objective of this network meta-analysis is to examine the relationship between different forms of NRTs and their oral side effects.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methodology</h3><p>Databases were screened for literature and full text articles were obtained for eligible studies. Relevant data was extracted. NMA Studio was used to perform random-effects network meta-analysis to generate mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates from odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The forest plot was generated, and the network diagram was drawn for key comparisons. The OR and 95% CI were estimated from the data on the number of patients that reported the oral side effects in the included studies.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>A total of 21 articles were included. The Risk of Bias assessment revealed a moderate to low risk across all domains for the included studies. The mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates indicated that nicotine gum was significantly associated with the occurrence of aphthous ulcers [2.25 (1.03, 4.90)] and gastric reflux/vomiting [4.40 (1.51, 12.80)]. Additionally, the results showed that nasal spray significantly caused mouth/throat irritation [5.37 (1.03, 27.92)] and taste disturbance [4.87 (2.83, 8.37)] in comparison to tested NRT interventions.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Significant oral side effects are associated with NRT use, as demonstrated in this study. Dentists should implement tobacco cessation methods in their practices, including pharmacotherapy, to effectively monitor these patients. Continuous education and certification programs should be mandatory for dentists who want to practice tobacco cessation. This should also be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum to help dentists gain confidence in prescribing NRT. Standard evidence-based guidelines should be published to outline possible methods for encouraging tobacco cessation in dental settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01064-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01064-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尼古丁替代疗法(NRTs)是吸烟者戒烟的主要药物选择。然而,它们可能导致口腔健康问题,包括阿弗他溃疡、导致牙齿磨损的胃刺激、口腔刺激、疼痛和干燥,这可能会降低患者的依从性。应将牙科医生纳入戒烟团队,以预防、检测和管理这些与使用 NRT 相关的口腔副作用。因此,本网络荟萃分析的目的是研究不同形式的非抗烟剂与其口腔副作用之间的关系。提取相关数据。使用 NMA Studio 进行随机效应网络荟萃分析,根据几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)生成混合治疗比较的集合估计值。生成森林图,并为关键比较绘制网络图。根据纳入研究中报告口服副作用的患者人数数据估算出 OR 和 95% CI。偏倚风险评估显示,纳入研究的所有领域均存在中度至低度偏倚风险。混合治疗比较的汇总估算结果显示,尼古丁口香糖与口腔溃疡[2.25 (1.03, 4.90)]和胃反流/呕吐[4.40 (1.51, 12.80)]的发生显著相关。此外,研究结果表明,与测试过的 NRT 干预措施相比,鼻腔喷雾剂会明显引起口腔/咽喉刺激 [5.37 (1.03, 27.92)]和味觉障碍 [4.87 (2.83, 8.37)]。牙科医生应在诊疗过程中采用戒烟方法,包括药物治疗,以有效监控这些患者。对于希望从事戒烟工作的牙科医生来说,持续教育和认证计划应该是强制性的。这也应纳入牙科本科课程,以帮助牙医获得开具NRT处方的信心。应出版以证据为基础的标准指南,概述在牙科环境中鼓励戒烟的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nicotine replacement therapy and oral health: a network meta-analysis of adverse effects in randomized trials

Nicotine replacement therapy and oral health: a network meta-analysis of adverse effects in randomized trials

Background

Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) are the primary pharmacological option for smokers looking to quit. However, they can lead to oral health issues, including aphthous ulcers, gastric irritation resulting in tooth wear, mouth irritation, soreness, and dryness, which may decrease patient adherence. Dentists should be integrated into the tobacco cessation team to prevent, detect, and manage these oral side effects associated with NRT use. Therefore, the objective of this network meta-analysis is to examine the relationship between different forms of NRTs and their oral side effects.

Methodology

Databases were screened for literature and full text articles were obtained for eligible studies. Relevant data was extracted. NMA Studio was used to perform random-effects network meta-analysis to generate mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates from odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The forest plot was generated, and the network diagram was drawn for key comparisons. The OR and 95% CI were estimated from the data on the number of patients that reported the oral side effects in the included studies.

Results

A total of 21 articles were included. The Risk of Bias assessment revealed a moderate to low risk across all domains for the included studies. The mixed treatment comparison pooled estimates indicated that nicotine gum was significantly associated with the occurrence of aphthous ulcers [2.25 (1.03, 4.90)] and gastric reflux/vomiting [4.40 (1.51, 12.80)]. Additionally, the results showed that nasal spray significantly caused mouth/throat irritation [5.37 (1.03, 27.92)] and taste disturbance [4.87 (2.83, 8.37)] in comparison to tested NRT interventions.

Conclusion

Significant oral side effects are associated with NRT use, as demonstrated in this study. Dentists should implement tobacco cessation methods in their practices, including pharmacotherapy, to effectively monitor these patients. Continuous education and certification programs should be mandatory for dentists who want to practice tobacco cessation. This should also be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum to help dentists gain confidence in prescribing NRT. Standard evidence-based guidelines should be published to outline possible methods for encouraging tobacco cessation in dental settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信