接受无创通气的新生儿鼻压损伤报告:范围界定审查

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexander E. Graf, Simon Bellido, Chellapriya Vythinathan, Jigar Govind, Lawrence Fordjour, Sydney C. Butts, Ann Woodhouse Plum
{"title":"接受无创通气的新生儿鼻压损伤报告:范围界定审查","authors":"Alexander E. Graf, Simon Bellido, Chellapriya Vythinathan, Jigar Govind, Lawrence Fordjour, Sydney C. Butts, Ann Woodhouse Plum","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02006-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although neonates receiving Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) for respiratory support are at risk for nasal pressure injuries, efforts to standardize reporting are limited. A scoping review was conducted to identify the reporting systems used for describing these injuries. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for papers reporting nasal injury with NIV usage in neonates. The primary outcome was reporting system usage. 705 titles and abstracts were screened. 40 papers met inclusion criteria. Most studies were Randomized Clinical Trials (37.5%) or cohort studies (37.5%). Most commonly, nasal injuries were reported using a unique, descriptive scale developed by the authors (10 studies, 25%). The Fischer et al 2010 scale, a three-stage reporting system, was used in 8 studies (20%). While 15 studies (38.0%) reported on specific anatomic subsite injury, only 2 studies (5.0%) employed endoscopy for assessment. Wide heterogeneity in pressure injury reporting secondary to NIV exists across specialties, institutions, and literature.","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":"44 12","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting nasal pressure injuries in neonates receiving non-invasive ventilation: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Alexander E. Graf, Simon Bellido, Chellapriya Vythinathan, Jigar Govind, Lawrence Fordjour, Sydney C. Butts, Ann Woodhouse Plum\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41372-024-02006-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although neonates receiving Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) for respiratory support are at risk for nasal pressure injuries, efforts to standardize reporting are limited. A scoping review was conducted to identify the reporting systems used for describing these injuries. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for papers reporting nasal injury with NIV usage in neonates. The primary outcome was reporting system usage. 705 titles and abstracts were screened. 40 papers met inclusion criteria. Most studies were Randomized Clinical Trials (37.5%) or cohort studies (37.5%). Most commonly, nasal injuries were reported using a unique, descriptive scale developed by the authors (10 studies, 25%). The Fischer et al 2010 scale, a three-stage reporting system, was used in 8 studies (20%). While 15 studies (38.0%) reported on specific anatomic subsite injury, only 2 studies (5.0%) employed endoscopy for assessment. Wide heterogeneity in pressure injury reporting secondary to NIV exists across specialties, institutions, and literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"volume\":\"44 12\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41372-024-02006-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41372-024-02006-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的虽然接受无创通气(NIV)呼吸支持的新生儿有鼻腔压力损伤的风险,但标准化报告的工作却很有限。为了确定用于描述这些损伤的报告系统,我们进行了一次范围界定审查。研究对象/方法我们查询了PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,以查找报告新生儿使用NIV时鼻腔损伤的论文。结果筛选了 705 篇标题和摘要。40 篇论文符合纳入标准。大多数研究为随机临床试验(37.5%)或队列研究(37.5%)。最常见的是使用作者开发的独特描述性量表报告鼻部损伤(10 项研究,25%)。8 项研究(20%)使用了 Fischer 等人 2010 年的量表,这是一种三阶段报告系统。15 项研究(38.0%)报告了特定解剖部位的损伤,只有 2 项研究(5.0%)采用内窥镜进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reporting nasal pressure injuries in neonates receiving non-invasive ventilation: a scoping review

Reporting nasal pressure injuries in neonates receiving non-invasive ventilation: a scoping review

Reporting nasal pressure injuries in neonates receiving non-invasive ventilation: a scoping review
Although neonates receiving Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) for respiratory support are at risk for nasal pressure injuries, efforts to standardize reporting are limited. A scoping review was conducted to identify the reporting systems used for describing these injuries. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for papers reporting nasal injury with NIV usage in neonates. The primary outcome was reporting system usage. 705 titles and abstracts were screened. 40 papers met inclusion criteria. Most studies were Randomized Clinical Trials (37.5%) or cohort studies (37.5%). Most commonly, nasal injuries were reported using a unique, descriptive scale developed by the authors (10 studies, 25%). The Fischer et al 2010 scale, a three-stage reporting system, was used in 8 studies (20%). While 15 studies (38.0%) reported on specific anatomic subsite injury, only 2 studies (5.0%) employed endoscopy for assessment. Wide heterogeneity in pressure injury reporting secondary to NIV exists across specialties, institutions, and literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信