经颅磁刺激加速疗法治疗耐药抑郁症的反应预测因素

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Qi Wang, Li Li, Hongyan Zhao, Wenwen Cheng, Gang Cui, Lin Fan, Xiaomei Dong, Zhongli Geng, Tianchao Xu
{"title":"经颅磁刺激加速疗法治疗耐药抑郁症的反应预测因素","authors":"Qi Wang, Li Li, Hongyan Zhao, Wenwen Cheng, Gang Cui, Lin Fan, Xiaomei Dong, Zhongli Geng, Tianchao Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00406-024-01903-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We aimed to investigate the existence of clinical predictive factors in response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of TRD. In total, 119 TRD patients who received accelerated rTMS were included in this study. The stimulation protocol was 15 Hz stimulation over the the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The protocol consisted of 25 sessions, each session lasting 30 min for a total of 3000 pulses. Five sessions were applied per day for 5 consecutive days. At baseline (T0), day 5 (immediately after treatment) (T1), 4 weeks after treatment (T2), depression severity was evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), cognitive function was evaluated using Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the intensity of suicidal ideation was evaluated using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was calculated at T0 and T2. The HAMD-17 scores, WCST performance, the C-SSRS scores at T1 and T2 were improved from T0 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The SII at T2 was lower than at T0 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The response rates at T1 and T2 were 57.98% (69/119) and 48.74% (58/119), respectively. The results of binary logistic analysis showed that shorter course of depression, two failed antidepressant trials, no history of ECT treatment, and lower levels of SII were predictive factors for accelerated rTMS treatment response at T1 and T2 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05), while not having a history of hospitalization was a predictive factor for response at T2 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) but not at T1 (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off values of SII for discriminating responders from non-responders at T1 and T2 were &lt; 478.56 and &lt; 485.03, respectively. The AUC of SII at T0 predicting response for T1 and T2 were 0.729 and 0.797. We found several clinical predictors of better responses to the accelerated rTMS. Identifying clinical predictors of response is relevant to personalize and adapt rTMS protocols in TRD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression\",\"authors\":\"Qi Wang, Li Li, Hongyan Zhao, Wenwen Cheng, Gang Cui, Lin Fan, Xiaomei Dong, Zhongli Geng, Tianchao Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00406-024-01903-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We aimed to investigate the existence of clinical predictive factors in response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of TRD. In total, 119 TRD patients who received accelerated rTMS were included in this study. The stimulation protocol was 15 Hz stimulation over the the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The protocol consisted of 25 sessions, each session lasting 30 min for a total of 3000 pulses. Five sessions were applied per day for 5 consecutive days. At baseline (T0), day 5 (immediately after treatment) (T1), 4 weeks after treatment (T2), depression severity was evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), cognitive function was evaluated using Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the intensity of suicidal ideation was evaluated using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was calculated at T0 and T2. The HAMD-17 scores, WCST performance, the C-SSRS scores at T1 and T2 were improved from T0 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The SII at T2 was lower than at T0 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The response rates at T1 and T2 were 57.98% (69/119) and 48.74% (58/119), respectively. The results of binary logistic analysis showed that shorter course of depression, two failed antidepressant trials, no history of ECT treatment, and lower levels of SII were predictive factors for accelerated rTMS treatment response at T1 and T2 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05), while not having a history of hospitalization was a predictive factor for response at T2 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) but not at T1 (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off values of SII for discriminating responders from non-responders at T1 and T2 were &lt; 478.56 and &lt; 485.03, respectively. The AUC of SII at T0 predicting response for T1 and T2 were 0.729 and 0.797. We found several clinical predictors of better responses to the accelerated rTMS. Identifying clinical predictors of response is relevant to personalize and adapt rTMS protocols in TRD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01903-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01903-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加速重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种治疗耐药抑郁症(TRD)的有效方法。我们的目的是研究加速经颅磁刺激治疗 TRD 是否存在临床预测因素。本研究共纳入了119名接受加速经颅磁刺激的TRD患者。刺激方案为对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层进行15赫兹刺激。刺激方案包括 25 个疗程,每个疗程持续 30 分钟,共 3000 个脉冲。每天进行 5 次,连续 5 天。在基线(T0)、治疗后第5天(T1)和治疗后4周(T2),使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)评估抑郁严重程度,使用威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)评估认知功能,使用哥伦比亚自杀严重程度量表(C-SRS)评估自杀意念强度。在T0和T2时计算全身免疫炎症指数(SII)。与 T0 相比,T1 和 T2 的 HAMD-17 评分、WCST 表现和 C-SSRS 评分均有所改善(P < 0.01)。T2 阶段的 SII 低于 T0 阶段(P <0.01)。T1和T2的应答率分别为57.98%(69/119)和48.74%(58/119)。二元逻辑分析结果显示,抑郁症病程较短、两次抗抑郁试验失败、无 ECT 治疗史和较低的 SII 水平是 T1 和 T2 期加速经颅磁刺激治疗反应的预测因素(P <;0.05),而无住院史是 T2 期反应的预测因素(P <;0.05),但不是 T1 期反应的预测因素(P >;0.05)。根据 ROC 曲线分析,在 T1 和 T2 期区分有反应者和无反应者的 SII 最佳临界值分别为 < 478.56 和 <485.03。预测 T1 和 T2 反应的 T0 时 SII 的 AUC 分别为 0.729 和 0.797。我们发现了几种对加速经颅磁刺激反应较好的临床预测因子。确定反应的临床预测因素对于个性化和调整 TRD 患者的经颅磁刺激方案具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predictors of response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression

Predictors of response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression

Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We aimed to investigate the existence of clinical predictive factors in response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of TRD. In total, 119 TRD patients who received accelerated rTMS were included in this study. The stimulation protocol was 15 Hz stimulation over the the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The protocol consisted of 25 sessions, each session lasting 30 min for a total of 3000 pulses. Five sessions were applied per day for 5 consecutive days. At baseline (T0), day 5 (immediately after treatment) (T1), 4 weeks after treatment (T2), depression severity was evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), cognitive function was evaluated using Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the intensity of suicidal ideation was evaluated using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was calculated at T0 and T2. The HAMD-17 scores, WCST performance, the C-SSRS scores at T1 and T2 were improved from T0 (P < 0.01). The SII at T2 was lower than at T0 (P < 0.01). The response rates at T1 and T2 were 57.98% (69/119) and 48.74% (58/119), respectively. The results of binary logistic analysis showed that shorter course of depression, two failed antidepressant trials, no history of ECT treatment, and lower levels of SII were predictive factors for accelerated rTMS treatment response at T1 and T2 (P < 0.05), while not having a history of hospitalization was a predictive factor for response at T2 (P < 0.05) but not at T1 (P > 0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off values of SII for discriminating responders from non-responders at T1 and T2 were < 478.56 and < 485.03, respectively. The AUC of SII at T0 predicting response for T1 and T2 were 0.729 and 0.797. We found several clinical predictors of better responses to the accelerated rTMS. Identifying clinical predictors of response is relevant to personalize and adapt rTMS protocols in TRD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信