多囊卵巢综合征妇女与对照组胚胎植入前囊胚染色体畸变的差异:一项多中心回顾性队列研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Lu Luo, Wenjun Wang, Yan Xu, Yuanyuan Yang, Limei Zhang, Jun Gao, Jiayi Mai, Qiong Wang, Fei Gong
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征妇女与对照组胚胎植入前囊胚染色体畸变的差异:一项多中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Lu Luo, Wenjun Wang, Yan Xu, Yuanyuan Yang, Limei Zhang, Jun Gao, Jiayi Mai, Qiong Wang, Fei Gong","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03235-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Comprehensive chromosomal status of blastocyst from women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was limited. This study aimed to identify possible differences in the preimplantation blastocyst chromosome aberrations between PCOS women and controls receiving preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study including a total of 707 blastocysts from 147 PCOS women and 3006 blastocysts from 821 control women receiving PGT between 2015 and 2021. Embryonic chromosomal aberration spectrums were compared between PCOS and controls. Mixed effects generalized linear model was conducted to explore possible influence of PCOS-related endocrinological disorders on embryonic chromosomal abnormalities.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Blastocysts from PCOS demonstrated significantly lower aneuploidy rate (15.2% vs. 25.2% per women, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001; 14.7% vs. 25.4% per blastocyst, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) but greater mosaicism rate (12.5% vs. 8.0% per women, <i>P</i> = 0.007; 16.5% vs. 8.7% per blastocyst, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Mixed effects generalized linear model identified PCOS as an independent protective factor against embryonic aneuploidy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.50<i>–</i>0.93, <i>P</i> = 0.014) but a risk factor for embryonic mosaicism (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11<i>–</i>2.10, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Further model analysis suggested that insulin resistance could be responsible for the increased risk of embryonic mosaicism among PCOS women (adjusted odds ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.10<i>–</i>4.31, <i>P</i> = 0.026).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>PCOS is associated with a lower aneuploidy risk but an increased mosaicism risk in preimplantation blastocysts, and insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in preimplantation blastocyst chromosomal aberrations between polycystic ovary syndrome women and controls: a multi-center retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Lu Luo, Wenjun Wang, Yan Xu, Yuanyuan Yang, Limei Zhang, Jun Gao, Jiayi Mai, Qiong Wang, Fei Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-024-03235-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Comprehensive chromosomal status of blastocyst from women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was limited. This study aimed to identify possible differences in the preimplantation blastocyst chromosome aberrations between PCOS women and controls receiving preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study including a total of 707 blastocysts from 147 PCOS women and 3006 blastocysts from 821 control women receiving PGT between 2015 and 2021. Embryonic chromosomal aberration spectrums were compared between PCOS and controls. Mixed effects generalized linear model was conducted to explore possible influence of PCOS-related endocrinological disorders on embryonic chromosomal abnormalities.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Blastocysts from PCOS demonstrated significantly lower aneuploidy rate (15.2% vs. 25.2% per women, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001; 14.7% vs. 25.4% per blastocyst, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) but greater mosaicism rate (12.5% vs. 8.0% per women, <i>P</i> = 0.007; 16.5% vs. 8.7% per blastocyst, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Mixed effects generalized linear model identified PCOS as an independent protective factor against embryonic aneuploidy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.50<i>–</i>0.93, <i>P</i> = 0.014) but a risk factor for embryonic mosaicism (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11<i>–</i>2.10, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Further model analysis suggested that insulin resistance could be responsible for the increased risk of embryonic mosaicism among PCOS women (adjusted odds ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.10<i>–</i>4.31, <i>P</i> = 0.026).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>PCOS is associated with a lower aneuploidy risk but an increased mosaicism risk in preimplantation blastocysts, and insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03235-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03235-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女胚泡染色体状况的全面研究有限。本研究旨在确定接受胚胎植入前基因检测(PGT)的多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性和对照组在胚胎植入前囊胚染色体畸变方面可能存在的差异。方法这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,包括 2015 年至 2021 年间接受 PGT 的 147 名 PCOS 女性的 707 个囊胚和 821 名对照组女性的 3006 个囊胚。比较了多囊卵巢综合征和对照组的胚胎染色体畸变谱。混合效应广义线性模型探讨了 PCOS 相关内分泌紊乱对胚胎染色体异常的可能影响。2% vs. 25.2% per women, P < 0.001; 14.7% vs. 25.4% per blastocyst, P < 0.001),但嵌合率较高(12.5% vs. 8.0% per women, P = 0.007; 16.5% vs. 8.7% per blastocyst, P < 0.001)。混合效应广义线性模型确定多囊卵巢综合征是胚胎非整倍体的独立保护因素(调整后的几率比 = 0.68,95% 置信区间为 0.50-0.93,P = 0.014),但却是胚胎嵌合的危险因素(调整后的几率比 = 1.52,95% 置信区间为 1.11-2.10,P = 0.009)。进一步的模型分析表明,胰岛素抵抗可能是 PCOS 妇女胚胎嵌合风险增加的原因(调整后的几率比 = 2.17,95% 置信区间为 1.10-4.31,P = 0.026)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Differences in preimplantation blastocyst chromosomal aberrations between polycystic ovary syndrome women and controls: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

Differences in preimplantation blastocyst chromosomal aberrations between polycystic ovary syndrome women and controls: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Comprehensive chromosomal status of blastocyst from women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was limited. This study aimed to identify possible differences in the preimplantation blastocyst chromosome aberrations between PCOS women and controls receiving preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).

Methods

This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study including a total of 707 blastocysts from 147 PCOS women and 3006 blastocysts from 821 control women receiving PGT between 2015 and 2021. Embryonic chromosomal aberration spectrums were compared between PCOS and controls. Mixed effects generalized linear model was conducted to explore possible influence of PCOS-related endocrinological disorders on embryonic chromosomal abnormalities.

Results

Blastocysts from PCOS demonstrated significantly lower aneuploidy rate (15.2% vs. 25.2% per women, P < 0.001; 14.7% vs. 25.4% per blastocyst, P < 0.001) but greater mosaicism rate (12.5% vs. 8.0% per women, P = 0.007; 16.5% vs. 8.7% per blastocyst, P < 0.001). Mixed effects generalized linear model identified PCOS as an independent protective factor against embryonic aneuploidy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.500.93, P = 0.014) but a risk factor for embryonic mosaicism (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.112.10, P = 0.009). Further model analysis suggested that insulin resistance could be responsible for the increased risk of embryonic mosaicism among PCOS women (adjusted odds ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.104.31, P = 0.026).

Conclusion

PCOS is associated with a lower aneuploidy risk but an increased mosaicism risk in preimplantation blastocysts, and insulin resistance should be investigated as a potential cause.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信