Justin Cottrell,Emily Spitzer,Arianna Winchester,Camille Dunn-Johnson,Bruce Gantz,Susan Rathgeb,Matthew Shew,Jacques Herzog,Craig Buchman,David Friedmann,Daniel Jethanamest,Sean McMenomey,Susan Waltzman,J Thomas Roland
{"title":"使用不同制造商的人工耳蜗再植入术后的表现","authors":"Justin Cottrell,Emily Spitzer,Arianna Winchester,Camille Dunn-Johnson,Bruce Gantz,Susan Rathgeb,Matthew Shew,Jacques Herzog,Craig Buchman,David Friedmann,Daniel Jethanamest,Sean McMenomey,Susan Waltzman,J Thomas Roland","doi":"10.1097/mao.0000000000004314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo better understand cochlear implant (CI) performance after reimplantation with a different device manufacturer.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nMultisite retrospective review.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nTertiary referral centers.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS\r\nPatients older than 4 years who received a CI and subsequently underwent CI reimplantation with a different manufacturer over a 20-year period.\r\n\r\nINTERVENTION\r\nReimplantation.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE\r\nThe primary outcome was difference in the best CNC score obtained with the primary CI, compared with the most recent CNC score obtained after reimplantation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwenty-nine patients met the criteria at three centers. The best average CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation was 46.2% (n = 16), measured an average of 14 months (range: 3-36 mo) postoperatively. When looking at the most recent CNC score of adult patients before undergoing reimplantation, the average CNC score dropped to 19.2% (n = 17). After reimplantation, the average 3- to 6-month CNC score was 48.3% (n = 12), with most recent average CNC score being 44.4% (n = 17) measured an average of 19 months (range: 3-46 mo) postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.321; t11 = 0.48) identified in performance between the best CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation, and the most recent score achieved after reimplantation (n = 12). Analysis of prerevision and postrevision speech performance was not possible in pediatric patients (<18 yr old) because of differences in tests administered.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPatients undergoing reimplantation with a different manufacturer achieved CNC score performance comparable to their best performance with their original device.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance After Cochlear Reimplantation Using a Different Manufacturer.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Cottrell,Emily Spitzer,Arianna Winchester,Camille Dunn-Johnson,Bruce Gantz,Susan Rathgeb,Matthew Shew,Jacques Herzog,Craig Buchman,David Friedmann,Daniel Jethanamest,Sean McMenomey,Susan Waltzman,J Thomas Roland\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/mao.0000000000004314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo better understand cochlear implant (CI) performance after reimplantation with a different device manufacturer.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\r\\nMultisite retrospective review.\\r\\n\\r\\nSETTING\\r\\nTertiary referral centers.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENTS\\r\\nPatients older than 4 years who received a CI and subsequently underwent CI reimplantation with a different manufacturer over a 20-year period.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERVENTION\\r\\nReimplantation.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE\\r\\nThe primary outcome was difference in the best CNC score obtained with the primary CI, compared with the most recent CNC score obtained after reimplantation.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTwenty-nine patients met the criteria at three centers. The best average CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation was 46.2% (n = 16), measured an average of 14 months (range: 3-36 mo) postoperatively. When looking at the most recent CNC score of adult patients before undergoing reimplantation, the average CNC score dropped to 19.2% (n = 17). After reimplantation, the average 3- to 6-month CNC score was 48.3% (n = 12), with most recent average CNC score being 44.4% (n = 17) measured an average of 19 months (range: 3-46 mo) postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.321; t11 = 0.48) identified in performance between the best CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation, and the most recent score achieved after reimplantation (n = 12). Analysis of prerevision and postrevision speech performance was not possible in pediatric patients (<18 yr old) because of differences in tests administered.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nPatients undergoing reimplantation with a different manufacturer achieved CNC score performance comparable to their best performance with their original device.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004314\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000004314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance After Cochlear Reimplantation Using a Different Manufacturer.
OBJECTIVE
To better understand cochlear implant (CI) performance after reimplantation with a different device manufacturer.
STUDY DESIGN
Multisite retrospective review.
SETTING
Tertiary referral centers.
PATIENTS
Patients older than 4 years who received a CI and subsequently underwent CI reimplantation with a different manufacturer over a 20-year period.
INTERVENTION
Reimplantation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
The primary outcome was difference in the best CNC score obtained with the primary CI, compared with the most recent CNC score obtained after reimplantation.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine patients met the criteria at three centers. The best average CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation was 46.2% (n = 16), measured an average of 14 months (range: 3-36 mo) postoperatively. When looking at the most recent CNC score of adult patients before undergoing reimplantation, the average CNC score dropped to 19.2% (n = 17). After reimplantation, the average 3- to 6-month CNC score was 48.3% (n = 12), with most recent average CNC score being 44.4% (n = 17) measured an average of 19 months (range: 3-46 mo) postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.321; t11 = 0.48) identified in performance between the best CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation, and the most recent score achieved after reimplantation (n = 12). Analysis of prerevision and postrevision speech performance was not possible in pediatric patients (<18 yr old) because of differences in tests administered.
CONCLUSION
Patients undergoing reimplantation with a different manufacturer achieved CNC score performance comparable to their best performance with their original device.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.