2015-2022 年急性鼻窦炎抗菌药处方模式:与已发布指南的比较

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sarit Dhar, Dhruv S. Kothari, Ana L. Tomescu, Brian D’Anza, Kenneth Rodriguez, Anthony Sheyn, Sanjeet V. Rangarajan
{"title":"2015-2022 年急性鼻窦炎抗菌药处方模式:与已发布指南的比较","authors":"Sarit Dhar, Dhruv S. Kothari, Ana L. Tomescu, Brian D’Anza, Kenneth Rodriguez, Anthony Sheyn, Sanjeet V. Rangarajan","doi":"10.1177/19458924241280379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundAcute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is one of the most encountered conditions in primary care and otolaryngology clinics. However, little is known about how antibiotic prescription practices following a diagnosis of ARS compare to guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Otolaryngology in 2015.ObjectiveTo investigate the epidemiology of ARS and the corresponding antibiotic prescribing practices by physicians and compare to published guidelines.MethodsUsing the TriNetX Live database, we identified all patients diagnosed with ARS using the ICD10 code J01 between April 2015 and December 2022 across the state of Tennessee. After investigating the demographics of this cohort, we compared the first prescribed antibiotic within one day of ARS diagnosis to published guidelines. Antibiotics were grouped into their respective classes.ResultsOf 81 310 patients diagnosed with ARS identified in the specified time frame, 66% were Female, 49% were African American, 44% were White, and the mean age was 47 ± 20 years. The six most common initial antibiotics prescribed for ARS were erythromycins/macrolides [14 609 (25.8%)], amoxicillin/clavulanate [14 322 (25.3%)], amoxicillin [9300 (16.4%)], third generation cephalosporins [7733 (13.6%)], quinolones [3648 (6.4%)] and tetracyclines [2235 (3.9%)]. Of this cohort, 56 719 patients (69.8%) of patients were prescribed an antibiotic within one day of diagnosis.ConclusionDespite published guidelines recommending amoxicillin with or without clavulanic acid as first-line treatment for ARS, only 42.2% of prescribed antibiotics followed this guideline in our cohort. While accounting for patients with penicillin allergy, the second-most represented antibiotics were erythromycins/macrolides, which are specifically recommended against due to high rates of S. Pneumoniae resistance. Our results suggest that further investigation into the causes of erythromycin/macrolide prescriptions as first line treatment for ARS and practices at other institutions should be conducted. In addition, building awareness around published ARS guidelines for physicians may be useful in improving antibiotic stewardship in treatment of ARS.","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Prescription Patterns for Acute Sinusitis 2015–2022: A Comparison to Published Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Sarit Dhar, Dhruv S. Kothari, Ana L. Tomescu, Brian D’Anza, Kenneth Rodriguez, Anthony Sheyn, Sanjeet V. Rangarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924241280379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundAcute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is one of the most encountered conditions in primary care and otolaryngology clinics. However, little is known about how antibiotic prescription practices following a diagnosis of ARS compare to guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Otolaryngology in 2015.ObjectiveTo investigate the epidemiology of ARS and the corresponding antibiotic prescribing practices by physicians and compare to published guidelines.MethodsUsing the TriNetX Live database, we identified all patients diagnosed with ARS using the ICD10 code J01 between April 2015 and December 2022 across the state of Tennessee. After investigating the demographics of this cohort, we compared the first prescribed antibiotic within one day of ARS diagnosis to published guidelines. Antibiotics were grouped into their respective classes.ResultsOf 81 310 patients diagnosed with ARS identified in the specified time frame, 66% were Female, 49% were African American, 44% were White, and the mean age was 47 ± 20 years. The six most common initial antibiotics prescribed for ARS were erythromycins/macrolides [14 609 (25.8%)], amoxicillin/clavulanate [14 322 (25.3%)], amoxicillin [9300 (16.4%)], third generation cephalosporins [7733 (13.6%)], quinolones [3648 (6.4%)] and tetracyclines [2235 (3.9%)]. Of this cohort, 56 719 patients (69.8%) of patients were prescribed an antibiotic within one day of diagnosis.ConclusionDespite published guidelines recommending amoxicillin with or without clavulanic acid as first-line treatment for ARS, only 42.2% of prescribed antibiotics followed this guideline in our cohort. While accounting for patients with penicillin allergy, the second-most represented antibiotics were erythromycins/macrolides, which are specifically recommended against due to high rates of S. Pneumoniae resistance. Our results suggest that further investigation into the causes of erythromycin/macrolide prescriptions as first line treatment for ARS and practices at other institutions should be conducted. In addition, building awareness around published ARS guidelines for physicians may be useful in improving antibiotic stewardship in treatment of ARS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924241280379\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924241280379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景急性鼻窦炎(ARS)是初级保健和耳鼻喉科门诊中最常见的疾病之一。然而,人们对 ARS 诊断后的抗生素处方做法与美国耳鼻喉科学会 2015 年制定的指南的比较却知之甚少。Objective To investigate the epidemiology of ARS and the corresponding antibiotic prescribing practices by physicians and compare to published guidelines.Methods利用 TriNetX Live 数据库,我们确定了田纳西州在 2015 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间使用 ICD10 代码 J01 诊断为 ARS 的所有患者。在调查了这批患者的人口统计学特征后,我们将 ARS 诊断后一天内首次处方的抗生素与已发布的指南进行了比较。结果 在规定时间内确诊的 81310 名 ARS 患者中,66% 为女性,49% 为非裔美国人,44% 为白人,平均年龄为 47 ± 20 岁。针对 ARS 最常见的六种处方抗生素是红霉素类/大环内酯类 [14 609 (25.8%)]、阿莫西林/克拉维酸[14 322 (25.3%)]、阿莫西林[9300 (16.4%)]、第三代头孢菌素[7733 (13.6%)]、喹诺酮类[3648 (6.4%)]和四环素类[2235 (3.9%)]。结论尽管已发布的指南推荐阿莫西林加或不加克拉维酸作为 ARS 的一线治疗,但在我们的队列中,只有 42.2% 的抗生素处方遵循了这一指南。考虑到青霉素过敏的患者,第二大抗生素是红霉素类/大环内酯类抗生素,由于肺炎链球菌的耐药率很高,因此特别建议不要使用这类抗生素。我们的研究结果表明,应进一步调查红霉素/大环内酯类抗生素作为 ARS 一线治疗处方的原因以及其他机构的做法。此外,提高医生对已发布的 ARS 指南的认识可能有助于改善 ARS 治疗中的抗生素管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial Prescription Patterns for Acute Sinusitis 2015–2022: A Comparison to Published Guidelines
BackgroundAcute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is one of the most encountered conditions in primary care and otolaryngology clinics. However, little is known about how antibiotic prescription practices following a diagnosis of ARS compare to guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Otolaryngology in 2015.ObjectiveTo investigate the epidemiology of ARS and the corresponding antibiotic prescribing practices by physicians and compare to published guidelines.MethodsUsing the TriNetX Live database, we identified all patients diagnosed with ARS using the ICD10 code J01 between April 2015 and December 2022 across the state of Tennessee. After investigating the demographics of this cohort, we compared the first prescribed antibiotic within one day of ARS diagnosis to published guidelines. Antibiotics were grouped into their respective classes.ResultsOf 81 310 patients diagnosed with ARS identified in the specified time frame, 66% were Female, 49% were African American, 44% were White, and the mean age was 47 ± 20 years. The six most common initial antibiotics prescribed for ARS were erythromycins/macrolides [14 609 (25.8%)], amoxicillin/clavulanate [14 322 (25.3%)], amoxicillin [9300 (16.4%)], third generation cephalosporins [7733 (13.6%)], quinolones [3648 (6.4%)] and tetracyclines [2235 (3.9%)]. Of this cohort, 56 719 patients (69.8%) of patients were prescribed an antibiotic within one day of diagnosis.ConclusionDespite published guidelines recommending amoxicillin with or without clavulanic acid as first-line treatment for ARS, only 42.2% of prescribed antibiotics followed this guideline in our cohort. While accounting for patients with penicillin allergy, the second-most represented antibiotics were erythromycins/macrolides, which are specifically recommended against due to high rates of S. Pneumoniae resistance. Our results suggest that further investigation into the causes of erythromycin/macrolide prescriptions as first line treatment for ARS and practices at other institutions should be conducted. In addition, building awareness around published ARS guidelines for physicians may be useful in improving antibiotic stewardship in treatment of ARS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信