不同密度下等距与非等距植株排列的大豆产量和种子质量

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21364
Emmanuela van Versendaal, Valentina M. Pereyra, Trent Irby, Peter Kovacs, Trevor Hefley, P. V. Vara Prasad, Peter Kyveryga, Bradley W. Van De Woestyne, Ignacio A. Ciampitti
{"title":"不同密度下等距与非等距植株排列的大豆产量和种子质量","authors":"Emmanuela van Versendaal, Valentina M. Pereyra, Trent Irby, Peter Kovacs, Trevor Hefley, P. V. Vara Prasad, Peter Kyveryga, Bradley W. Van De Woestyne, Ignacio A. Ciampitti","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equidistant plant arrangements have shown positive impacts, in the United States over the last century, on soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) yield and seed quality by reducing intraspecific plant competition and enhancing early canopy cover. This study aims to (i) assess the effects of equidistant versus non-equidistant plant arrangements on soybean yield and seed quality across different regions in the United States; (ii) explore the effect of modified soybean plant canopy resulting from different plant arrangements on yield and seed quality. In 2021 and 2022, 13 trials were conducted in Kansas, Mississippi, and South Dakota. The treatments consisted of three equidistant plant arrangements of 13 cm × 13 cm, 15 cm × 15 cm, and 20 cm × 20 cm (620,000, 430,000, 242,363 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), and a non-equidistant with 38 cm of row space (321,236 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>). Soybean yield and yield components were collected, and canopy coverage (%) was monitored throughout the growing season. Overall, there is no evidence of any advantage of equidistant over non-equidistant arrangements in soybeans. Yield differences related to spatial arrangement were observed in only three trials: the non-equidistant increased yield compared to the 20 cm × 20 cm equidistant arrangement (lowest density) in two trials, while the 13 × 13 and 15 × 15 patterns (highest density) showed higher yield compared to the 20 cm × 20 cm arrangement in one trial. Furthermore, seed quality remained constant across spatial arrangements in the 13 trials. In contrast to prior research, our study found no correlation between canopy coverage development and yield improvement. The tested equidistant arrangement while promising did not provide substantial evidence of yield improvement relative to the non-equidistant.","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soybean yield and seed quality in equidistant versus non-equidistant plant arrangements under different densities\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuela van Versendaal, Valentina M. Pereyra, Trent Irby, Peter Kovacs, Trevor Hefley, P. V. Vara Prasad, Peter Kyveryga, Bradley W. Van De Woestyne, Ignacio A. Ciampitti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/csc2.21364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Equidistant plant arrangements have shown positive impacts, in the United States over the last century, on soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) yield and seed quality by reducing intraspecific plant competition and enhancing early canopy cover. This study aims to (i) assess the effects of equidistant versus non-equidistant plant arrangements on soybean yield and seed quality across different regions in the United States; (ii) explore the effect of modified soybean plant canopy resulting from different plant arrangements on yield and seed quality. In 2021 and 2022, 13 trials were conducted in Kansas, Mississippi, and South Dakota. The treatments consisted of three equidistant plant arrangements of 13 cm × 13 cm, 15 cm × 15 cm, and 20 cm × 20 cm (620,000, 430,000, 242,363 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), and a non-equidistant with 38 cm of row space (321,236 seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>). Soybean yield and yield components were collected, and canopy coverage (%) was monitored throughout the growing season. Overall, there is no evidence of any advantage of equidistant over non-equidistant arrangements in soybeans. Yield differences related to spatial arrangement were observed in only three trials: the non-equidistant increased yield compared to the 20 cm × 20 cm equidistant arrangement (lowest density) in two trials, while the 13 × 13 and 15 × 15 patterns (highest density) showed higher yield compared to the 20 cm × 20 cm arrangement in one trial. Furthermore, seed quality remained constant across spatial arrangements in the 13 trials. In contrast to prior research, our study found no correlation between canopy coverage development and yield improvement. The tested equidistant arrangement while promising did not provide substantial evidence of yield improvement relative to the non-equidistant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21364\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在上个世纪的美国,等距植株排列通过减少种内植物竞争和提高早期冠层覆盖率,对大豆(Glycine max L.)的产量和种子质量产生了积极影响。本研究旨在:(i) 评估等距与非等距植物排列对美国不同地区大豆产量和种子质量的影响;(ii) 探讨不同植物排列导致的大豆植株冠层改变对产量和种子质量的影响。2021 年和 2022 年,在堪萨斯州、密西西比州和南达科他州进行了 13 项试验。处理包括 13 厘米×13 厘米、15 厘米×15 厘米和 20 厘米×20 厘米(分别为 62 万、43 万、242,363 粒/公顷)的三种等距植株排列,以及行距为 38 厘米的非等距排列(321,236 粒/公顷)。收集了大豆产量和产量成分,并在整个生长季节监测冠层覆盖率(%)。总体而言,没有证据表明大豆等距种植比非等距种植有任何优势。仅在三个试验中观察到了与空间排列有关的产量差异:在两个试验中,非等距排列比 20 厘米 × 20 厘米等距排列(密度最低)的产量更高,而在一个试验中,13 × 13 和 15 × 15 图案(密度最高)比 20 厘米 × 20 厘米排列的产量更高。此外,在 13 个试验中,不同空间排列的种子质量保持不变。与之前的研究不同,我们的研究发现冠层覆盖发展与产量提高之间没有关联。与非等距排列相比,试验中的等距排列虽然很有前景,但并没有提供产量提高的实质性证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soybean yield and seed quality in equidistant versus non-equidistant plant arrangements under different densities
Equidistant plant arrangements have shown positive impacts, in the United States over the last century, on soybean (Glycine max L.) yield and seed quality by reducing intraspecific plant competition and enhancing early canopy cover. This study aims to (i) assess the effects of equidistant versus non-equidistant plant arrangements on soybean yield and seed quality across different regions in the United States; (ii) explore the effect of modified soybean plant canopy resulting from different plant arrangements on yield and seed quality. In 2021 and 2022, 13 trials were conducted in Kansas, Mississippi, and South Dakota. The treatments consisted of three equidistant plant arrangements of 13 cm × 13 cm, 15 cm × 15 cm, and 20 cm × 20 cm (620,000, 430,000, 242,363 seeds ha−1, respectively), and a non-equidistant with 38 cm of row space (321,236 seeds ha−1). Soybean yield and yield components were collected, and canopy coverage (%) was monitored throughout the growing season. Overall, there is no evidence of any advantage of equidistant over non-equidistant arrangements in soybeans. Yield differences related to spatial arrangement were observed in only three trials: the non-equidistant increased yield compared to the 20 cm × 20 cm equidistant arrangement (lowest density) in two trials, while the 13 × 13 and 15 × 15 patterns (highest density) showed higher yield compared to the 20 cm × 20 cm arrangement in one trial. Furthermore, seed quality remained constant across spatial arrangements in the 13 trials. In contrast to prior research, our study found no correlation between canopy coverage development and yield improvement. The tested equidistant arrangement while promising did not provide substantial evidence of yield improvement relative to the non-equidistant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信